John Engelman, come on down.

[QueequegsHead]

I just looked. I thought he had passed, but there is just a born date...

Hope he's enjoying the vacation.

 

[Chobham]

He retired to FL sometime ago. Down in the Marco Island vicinity as I recall.

 

[QueequegsHead]

I know his sidekick (Marshall?) passed.

 

[Chobham]

I know his sidekick (Marshall?) passed.

Herman Cain I think.

 

[icanhelp1]

Taxation is NOT trivial nor particularly suited for "one liner" analysis. There are two books out there that cover the subject in detail. The first explains what the "Fair Tax" is and how it works. The second book answers the critics point by point.

The current US tax code is out of control. No one understands it fully and it contains more than it's share of contradictory regulations. Last time I heard if you called the IRS help line you only stood a 50% chance of getting the correct answer.

Current IRS code and regulation size (Maybe),

The "Fair Tax" is like maybe 20 pages.

A fair tax as defined by progressive marxist is turn over you earnings to the state because you're working and don't deserve to keep what you make. The lame and lazy deserve it more.

 

[Rainblow]

https://www.discovermagazine.com/mind/do-iq-tests-actually-measure-intelligence

If you want a plethora of links let me know I can easily provide them but it might be better if you expanded your knowledge base all on your lonesome. You provide outdated info proved wrong time and time again. But what do you expect from old af morons who use terms like 'oriental' 'darkie' and 'negro'. It's not the 1950s anymore check your calendar it's the 21st C.
Oh, and btw you decrepit racists are wordy, boring fuckers. GFY

 

[JohnEngelman]

Everyone paying their fair share.
The reinstatement of privacy rights economically.
The paying of taxes on a voluntary basis and not at the point of a gun.

What is fair share? There is no objective criterion for fairness.

No civilization could exist without government. No government could exist without compulsory tax paying.

 

[JohnEngelman]

I already gave the rebuttal and you have been reduced to repeating yourself.

Maybe a bigger font next time; as if shouting would win the point where repetition could not...

You refuted nothing.

Franklin Roosevelt was elected president in 1932. The unemployment rate was 23.6 %.
https://www.infoplease.com/business/labor/united-states-unemployment-rate

Per capita income in 1996 dollars was $4,901.
http://www.singularity.com/charts/page99.html

The top tax rate was 63.0%.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/02inpetr.pdf

In 1944 the unemployment rate was 1.2%. Per capita income in 1996 dollars was $12,380. The top tax rate was 94.0%.

During the Roosevelt administration we taxed and spent our way to prosperity.

For years public opinion surveys have indicated popular support for a more progressive tax system.

https://www.google.com/search?q=pol...gEKMC4xNS4xLjEuMpgBAKABAbABCg&sclient=gws-wiz

 

[Rainblow]

Luckily the decrepit racist morons will be dead soon . There's something to be said for advanced old age.

 

[Rainblow]

^^^^ Since you're a lazy fuck and a fall down I'll post a shit load of them in a little bit. Kinda thought you'd have the capabilities to do it on your own.

 

[JohnEngelman]

Luckily the decrepit racist morons will be dead soon . There's something to be said for advanced old age.

Because black social pathology has gotten worse since 1963, the truth will live on about intrinsic racial differences in characteristics necessary for civilization to operate well. This truth will become increasingly difficult to deny as intelligence becomes increasingly important to our economy, and as more gene alleles are discovered that determine intelligence and that influence criminal and sexual behavior.

 

[Rightguide]

Taxation is NOT trivial nor particularly suited for "one liner" analysis. There are two books out there that cover the subject in detail. The first explains what the "Fair Tax" is and how it works. The second book answers the critics point by point.

The current US tax code is out of control. No one understands it fully and it contains more than it's share of contradictory regulations. Last time I heard if you called the IRS help line you only stood a 50% chance of getting the correct answer.

Current IRS code and regulation size (Maybe),

The "Fair Tax" is like maybe 20 pages.

After 45 minutes of negotiating the options of annoying recordings, you finally reach a human being who can't help you and another 20 minutes waiting for someone who can.

 

[JohnEngelman]

https://www.discovermagazine.com/mind/do-iq-tests-actually-measure-intelligence

If you want a plethora of links let me know I can easily provide them but it might be better if you expanded your knowledge base all on your lonesome. You provide outdated info proved wrong time and time again. But what do you expect from old af morons who use terms like 'oriental' 'darkie' and 'negro'. It's not the 1950s anymore check your calendar it's the 21st C.
Oh, and btw you decrepit racists are wordy, boring fuckers. GFY

Rainbow, did you read the entire article? I did.

------------

Do IQ Tests Actually Measure Intelligence?​

The assessments have been around for over 100 years. Experts say they’ve been plagued by bias, but still have some merit.​

By Allison WhittenJul 1, 2020 11:14 AM

Another issue is the cultural bias baked into the nature of the test itself...

“(IQ tests) are culturally, linguistically and economically biased against minoritized students, in particular Black, first and foremost, and then Hispanic,” says Ford. “If these tests were not biased, we wouldn’t have different IQ scores along racial and ethnic lines — but we do. It’s an indication that there is something wrong with these tests, not with us.”

Ford’s research, along with work by many others, shows that the use of biased IQ tests is keeping many bright minority students out of gifted education programs. Ford has been studying multicultural gifted education for over 30 years and notes that while there has been some improvement for Hispanics, she hasn’t seen any meaningful improvement in the representation of Black students...

Although improvements are needed, both Ford and Dombrowski agree that IQ tests can still be useful as one part of an overall assessment of the whole person.

https://www.discovermagazine.com/mind/do-iq-tests-actually-measure-intelligence

------------

Although IQ tests were originally designed for whites, it was quickly discovered that Orientals tended to perform better on the tests than whites, and consequently much better than Negroes. This was true even when the Orientals were poor, and spoke English as a second language.

I have read in several sources, so I suspect that it is true, that when mental aptitude tests are held constant, whites still tend to perform better than Negroes. Consequently, it cannot be said that Negroes have different abilities, not measured by the tests, that enable them to perform well in school and on the job. By every objective, measurable criterion, Negroes tend to perform less well intellectually than whites and Orientals. This is impressive evidence for genetic determinism, hereditarianism, and race realism.

 

[JohnEngelman]

She wont understand you. There are no insults,. F words, and swear words in your post. Just another poster on here whose mouth spews like a sewer. perhaps they should stick to the porn sections. If not sooner or later she will use the MF word, that darkies are so fond of spewing.

Words change their meaning over time. When I was young a racist was one who hated every single Negro simply because the Negro was a Negro.

Now a racist seems to be one who tells unflattering facts about the Negro race as a whole. One does not need to do a lot of reading to know these facts. All one needs is extensive experience with Negroes.

 

[iso36]

I dont know anyone who hates negroes simply for their being black. Their reasons will always come back to behaviour. I guess I dont know any racists; just people who can not tolerate obnoxious anti-social behaviour.

Racists are supposed to be the haters. Yet it seems to be the liberals expressing hate and wishing us to die soon, I will disappoint them. I am nowhere near dying. Except if someone takes me off my bike

These are good points. Behavior drives conclusions. And so-called "liberals" are usually the first ones to become judgmental and aggressive.

 

[JohnEngelman]

These are good points. Behavior drives conclusions. And so-called "liberals" are usually the first ones to become judgmental and aggressive.

The less contact one has with Negroes the more one is likely to like them.

 

[iso36]

The less contact one has with Negroes the more one is likely to like them.

That's where we differ.

I have loads of friends from all the ethnic groups you "rank" below you, each of whom is far superior to you in every way.

 

[ll74]

The less contact one has with Negroes the more one is likely to like them.

Dumbshittery advice, by JohnnyEngles

 

[JohnEngelman]

That's where we differ.

I have loads of friends from all the ethnic groups you "rank" below you, each of whom is far superior to you in every way.

This guy thought the same way you do until a Negro cut his throat without provocation.

 

[doubleover]

The less contact one has with Negroes the more one is likely to like them.

No truer worlds have been spoken.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

No truer worlds have been spoken.

schmucks are a gift that keeps on giving.

 

[mayfly13]

Because black social pathology has gotten worse since 1963, the truth will live on about intrinsic racial differences in characteristics necessary for civilization to operate well. This truth will become increasingly difficult to deny as intelligence becomes increasingly important to our economy, and as more gene alleles are discovered that determine intelligence and that influence criminal and sexual behavior.

rofl
this post got a like from Kradder

 

[Fuzzy1975]

rofl
this post got a like from Kradder

What do you expect from two racists peas in a pod?

 

[mayfly13]

What do you expect from two racists peas in a pod?

the other funny thing is - they all are in such awe of themselves

as if,
just because their ethnicity scored high on tests
they themselves are high IQers.

 

[mayfly13]

What do you expect from two racists peas in a pod?

Coming back to IQ's:

never took one, they were not done in any institution back in my day
but I would also dread taking one.
While scoring far higher than my schoolmates in Math in school, that was due to ten times more labor and hours put in
I also struggled with Physics and my verbal skills have always been poor.

Moreover, ever since I took this Critical Thinking paper
my hunch became that such tests measure both innate intelligence BUT ALSO "acquired" intelligence -- aka proficiency in skills that if you were lucky, were drilled into you by talentedteachers.

See? Prior to the Critical Thinking paper, I would get lost in the sea of intentional and unintentional obfuscations on this board.
Now I can see right through them,
and I can also see how some posters' arguments look more intelligent than others merely because they are applying skills taught in this course.