Nobody has ever suggested that it should be. Why do you feel so threatened by trans people?We exist as individuals and we exist as a society. We should try and live together, but society is never going to be organized around the aspirations of a tiny minority of transgender people.
No, she wasn't. She spoke - and still speaks - from a position of ignorance based on a notion that trans people are intrinsically rapists in disguise and that they will be lurking in public toilets with the sole intention of raping.JK Rowling was correct when she pointed out that women's rights were being sacrificed, pushed aside and compromised by a radical trans-gender agenda.
Statistically, women are about 1000 times more likely to be raped, sexually assaulted or murdered by a member of the Metropolitan Police than a trans woman taking a piss.
Educate yourself.
No, she was spouting tabloid misconceptions based on the use of puberty blockers. Nobody is being transitioned 'far too young'. There are an immense number of hurdles to be overcome before anyone transitions but that's conveniently ignored by people like Rowling and her small-minded followers.She also did tremendous good by being the first major figure to point out that children and youngsters were being 'transitioned' far too young.
So tell me, how many trans medal winners have there been compared to biological women?Toleration is the minimum, acceptance is a reasonable aspiration but the 130 year tradition of the "Olympic Movement's" sporting tradition of allowing women to be battered out of contention by transgenders has to cease.
It's quite possible to be fair to both. And all the time sheep are bleating about whether or not trans people are a threat, women's rights are being slowly taken away. Fat white politicians are the threat, not trans people.Unfair to transgenders? but much more unfair to women who are 50% of the worlds population; on that fact alone Women's rights are more important and require precedence.