Whatever Laurel did, it was almost as written.Lauren.Hynde said:There have been other multiple page poetry submissions recently, but nothing you'd want to know about.
I suspect your poem crossed over to page 2 not so much for its pure extent but also because of the amount of invisible code involved.
WickedEve said:
I had fun writing this piece, it made me laugh as I wrote it.WickedEve said:
Your poetry should make you smile once in while.
Dang, W.E.! you saw right past the surface meaning and into the depth of my twisted, sick, fishy soul!WickedEve said:
WickedEve said:
Lauren.Hynde said:I was gonna say it was the loveliest little poem. Would that be safe with your teacher, Homer?
Thank you for the mention of my poem Cordie. It's my first graphic poem, written/designed for Angeline's challenge, and let me tell you, these poems are fun!Cordelia said:
Cordelia, I think highly about your poetry and about your potential. I never meant to "ignore" you. I am much less active on the forum than one would infere from the flames. Please ask your questions now and I'll do my best to answer them.Cordelia said:
That's a nice attitude toward poetry, objective, even if I hear a serious doubt about the author as a person. Not all of the rest of this forum is in your league, Cordelia. Whenever I am in a conflict on this forum my ratings go South, which is fun for me to watch, I like trivia, and forum provides them for me. For instance, for months my poems collect from zero to two votes. When they do, then 5. is the most common average. But after the last conflict the number of my 5-rated poems went down from its customary 60 to 38. Furthermore, "eternal Italy" has collected unheard of for my poems 6 votes in one day. Only one of my well over 200 poems has more votes, and only two other of my poems have 6 votes (but it took the three of them a total of 9417 reads and a year time to get them). Of course, despite your nice enthusiasm for my poem the average vote for "eternal Italy" (rating) is 2.83, below 3
Just 15 reads and 6 votes! (now it has 32 reads), while poems with over 300 reads may have zero votes. I love trivia, they tell me a lot about the human nature. BTW, I have for about the whole year that I am on Literotica a lazy fan on this forum who votes 1 to 3 on my poems but only on those for which there is link provided on this forum Thus I hardly ever have average 5. on a poem with a link to it here, on our forum, unless Literotica removes her/his vote as "fraud". All together, there is too much manipulation around votes to consider them to be interesting statistically. They still make for good trivia and I am all for any kind of numbers (they are the second best, while geometry is still better).One more thing. About twice a week I search for "Senna" so that I can react to poetic issues, when I am mentioned (but I don't search for "SJ; the search engine doesn't accept short, 2-letter search strings). Thus when "Senna" is mentioned I try to overcome my inertia and to respond.Cordelia said:
Senna Jawa said:
I am terribly sorry for not typing correctly your username. I have fixed it in my original post already.DarlingNikki said:
. I think that I glanced at some of your poems and each of them was uneven, while your prose is artistically mature. I should really have another look at your poems before stating such opinions).).
