graceanne
iteroticalay urugay
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2004
- Posts
- 27,579
February 2nd - words of CutieMouse
EG is right; my objection is to the use of the word "true"- particularly when dealing with someone who has little or no understading of BDSM.
"True" implies that if you don't *NEED* to submit (how subjective is that?) that you are fake.
"True" implies that if you aren't black and white 100% either way, you are fake.
"True" implies that anyone who doesn't practice BDSM in XYZ manner (with the stamp of approval on their ass to prove it), is fake.
When I first began to explore my feelings with regards to power in relationships, I absorbed a lot of the "True submissives are X/True dominants are Z" stuff... IMO the "True" argument is a bunch of hogwash, as BDSM hinges on the needs of the individual parties involved in each relationship.
Under the "True" argument, it would be easy for one to claim that Shanky isn't a "True" Top/Dom- he's a cross dressing bisexual guy who spent quite a while as a bottom. You could argue Netz isn't a "True" Domme, because she tends to be pretty laid back about a lot of shit. You could argue that I'm not a "True" submissive, because I'd refuse to consider a realtionship with a Lover who wouldn't let me Top him- yet I most comfortably ID myself as submissive. You could just as easily argue Kajira and Catalina are "True" as they are slaves; Marquis is "True" as he is one hell of an Alpha male (with mini-harem), or that EG, AngelicAssassin, RJMasters, or DVS are "True" because (to my kowledge) none of them are interested in doing anything other than deliciously wicked things to a willing subject... In actuality, we are all exactly who we are, experiencing BDSM in a manner that works for our particular lives, and our personal truths, not some pre-conceived checklist-style notion of what a "True" Dominant or submissive is...
How do you know if your a sub or dom?
EG is right; my objection is to the use of the word "true"- particularly when dealing with someone who has little or no understading of BDSM.
"True" implies that if you don't *NEED* to submit (how subjective is that?) that you are fake.
"True" implies that if you aren't black and white 100% either way, you are fake.
"True" implies that anyone who doesn't practice BDSM in XYZ manner (with the stamp of approval on their ass to prove it), is fake.
When I first began to explore my feelings with regards to power in relationships, I absorbed a lot of the "True submissives are X/True dominants are Z" stuff... IMO the "True" argument is a bunch of hogwash, as BDSM hinges on the needs of the individual parties involved in each relationship.
Under the "True" argument, it would be easy for one to claim that Shanky isn't a "True" Top/Dom- he's a cross dressing bisexual guy who spent quite a while as a bottom. You could argue Netz isn't a "True" Domme, because she tends to be pretty laid back about a lot of shit. You could argue that I'm not a "True" submissive, because I'd refuse to consider a realtionship with a Lover who wouldn't let me Top him- yet I most comfortably ID myself as submissive. You could just as easily argue Kajira and Catalina are "True" as they are slaves; Marquis is "True" as he is one hell of an Alpha male (with mini-harem), or that EG, AngelicAssassin, RJMasters, or DVS are "True" because (to my kowledge) none of them are interested in doing anything other than deliciously wicked things to a willing subject... In actuality, we are all exactly who we are, experiencing BDSM in a manner that works for our particular lives, and our personal truths, not some pre-conceived checklist-style notion of what a "True" Dominant or submissive is...
How do you know if your a sub or dom?