bandelero
Really Really Experienced
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2006
- Posts
- 347
23/01/08 words of caitlynne in the thread:Friends With Benefits AKA My Dom Dumped Me
A great attempt to deal with the online/RL dichotomy. I have bolded the parts I liked best.
<Quote> We all know and understand that experiences in text are real. No one denies that even in text, emotions can become real. There are epic love stories about lovers who only had letters to keep them warm, and we all cry when we read about such love stories. [OK maybe only *I* cry] Soldiers during WWII only got letters from their wives or girlfriends to keep their love alive. Text works. It does. No doubt about it. That experience is real, and intense.
But, you cannot equate text with the physical. It is apples and oranges. No one is saying your experiences aren't valid. No one. They are just not the same as a couple doing the things face to face that you are talking about doing in text.
This debate is as old as this forum I think, and we go round and round each time. On-liners defend their relationships, which is passionate and good in my book. Face to facers shake their heads because it is like trying to explain childbirth to a man, you simply have no way to wrap your brain around the fact that face to face is different than text.
Different is not invalidating your on line experience. No one is saying it is make believe, which is the real reason I think so many on-liners get offended. You think we are saying you are make believe. We're not saying that, we're saying it is not "face to face", and that is a BIG contrast to text.
As a person who likes power exchange, on line won't give me the fulfillment of that desire. The others are right, the off switch is right there. I can pretend I have given up power, but it won't give me the result I seek. Physically, emotionally, mentally, it just doesn't cut it when it comes to power exchange. I recognize that. Text doesn't deliver that, while face to face does. There are things that can't be done in text. There are things that sometimes can't be done face to face. They are different mediums. They are not the same.
Saying they are not the same does not mean your experiences are invalid. Your experiences and your emotions are all real. But you simply can't compare non-face to face with face to face. It's like saying watching a travelogue of a trip to Paris is the same as being there. Sure you can look at the beauty of Paris on the film. You can even fall in love with Paris watching that film. But what you'll never be able to do watching that film is smell the flowers in the spring, or feel the breeze on your face. See? it's different.
All that said, if you like on line--go for it. Embrace it. What does it matter if it is different as long as you find it fulfilling. There are still things I can enjoy on line as well. The co-writing can lead to some interesting places in fantasy and be very revealing about my own nature. It has a place and I still enjoy some of it because of the places it can take me. We'll often go places in our minds that we'd not venture to go in real time. It can be an inner discovery of deeper truths. It has its place even for those of us who have [or have had] face to face.
But let's not confuse them with being equal experiences. They simply aren't. They are different. All valid, but different.
And just as a point of interest, any on-liners might want to listen to those who have done both, because like others, I've never known anyone who was face to face think it would be cool to just go text--unless they were forced to do it by circumstances beyond their control. </Quote>
A great attempt to deal with the online/RL dichotomy. I have bolded the parts I liked best.
<Quote> We all know and understand that experiences in text are real. No one denies that even in text, emotions can become real. There are epic love stories about lovers who only had letters to keep them warm, and we all cry when we read about such love stories. [OK maybe only *I* cry] Soldiers during WWII only got letters from their wives or girlfriends to keep their love alive. Text works. It does. No doubt about it. That experience is real, and intense.
But, you cannot equate text with the physical. It is apples and oranges. No one is saying your experiences aren't valid. No one. They are just not the same as a couple doing the things face to face that you are talking about doing in text.
This debate is as old as this forum I think, and we go round and round each time. On-liners defend their relationships, which is passionate and good in my book. Face to facers shake their heads because it is like trying to explain childbirth to a man, you simply have no way to wrap your brain around the fact that face to face is different than text.
Different is not invalidating your on line experience. No one is saying it is make believe, which is the real reason I think so many on-liners get offended. You think we are saying you are make believe. We're not saying that, we're saying it is not "face to face", and that is a BIG contrast to text.
As a person who likes power exchange, on line won't give me the fulfillment of that desire. The others are right, the off switch is right there. I can pretend I have given up power, but it won't give me the result I seek. Physically, emotionally, mentally, it just doesn't cut it when it comes to power exchange. I recognize that. Text doesn't deliver that, while face to face does. There are things that can't be done in text. There are things that sometimes can't be done face to face. They are different mediums. They are not the same.
Saying they are not the same does not mean your experiences are invalid. Your experiences and your emotions are all real. But you simply can't compare non-face to face with face to face. It's like saying watching a travelogue of a trip to Paris is the same as being there. Sure you can look at the beauty of Paris on the film. You can even fall in love with Paris watching that film. But what you'll never be able to do watching that film is smell the flowers in the spring, or feel the breeze on your face. See? it's different.
All that said, if you like on line--go for it. Embrace it. What does it matter if it is different as long as you find it fulfilling. There are still things I can enjoy on line as well. The co-writing can lead to some interesting places in fantasy and be very revealing about my own nature. It has a place and I still enjoy some of it because of the places it can take me. We'll often go places in our minds that we'd not venture to go in real time. It can be an inner discovery of deeper truths. It has its place even for those of us who have [or have had] face to face.
But let's not confuse them with being equal experiences. They simply aren't. They are different. All valid, but different.
And just as a point of interest, any on-liners might want to listen to those who have done both, because like others, I've never known anyone who was face to face think it would be cool to just go text--unless they were forced to do it by circumstances beyond their control. </Quote>