So what SHOULD be the guideline?I put The Federalist Papers into the same category as The Bible.
People too attached to it are usually using it as an excuse, not a guideline.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So what SHOULD be the guideline?I put The Federalist Papers into the same category as The Bible.
People too attached to it are usually using it as an excuse, not a guideline.
Sure seems like in Florida that isn’t the case. But you don’t want to engage on that discussion. Your Nazi boy can’t possibly be wrong or violate the constitution.We all have free speech rights as explained in the First Amendment. Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech.
Congress did not pass a law infringing on Disney’s freedom of speech.Sure seems like in Florida that isn’t the case. But you don’t want to engage on that discussion. Your Nazi boy can’t possibly be wrong or violate the constitution.
Correct. And Florida didn’t either. Yet, your boy did. Since you agree with it you don’t see the problem.Congress did not pass a law infringing on Disney’s freedom of speech.
The state legislature passed a bill giving Disney control over the Reedy Creek Special District about 50 years ago. Then last year the state legislature passed a bill removing that privilege and the governor signed it. No constitutional violation.Correct. And Florida didn’t either. Yet, your boy did. Since you agree with it you don’t see the problem.
Let’s do it this way, why did he act on Disney’s status?
Speech.
Thanks for the lesson.
And why did they do it? Why did they not do it before then? What made Disney’s special district different than that of the others in the Sunshine state?The state legislature passed a bill giving Disney control over the Reedy Creek Special District about 50 years ago. Then last year the state legislature passed a bill removing that privilege and the governor signed it. No constitutional violation.
The problem is that your stand on people possessing the power of firearms is that there should be no limit at all, in any case, of possession. You regard any attempt at requirements for education, training, or consequences for lack of either as a limitation on your power.
Note: I'm using 'power' instead of 'rights' or 'freedom' because this debate is about power.
Really? Convicted felons loose the right to bear arms unless reinstated by a federal court. (The same should be true re. voting.) Non-citizens don't have that right. Can't carry in a court house or polling place. Virtually no one thinks that those are overly burdensome. You can't own a fully automatic weapon or a cannon without going through an extensive permitting process, same with explosives.The problem is that your stand on people possessing the power of firearms is that there should be no limit at all, in any case, of possession. You regard any attempt at requirements for education, training, or consequences for lack of either as a limitation on your power.
Note: I'm using 'power' instead of 'rights' or 'freedom' because this debate is about power.
Definitely need to ban those damned SUV's.Don't take this and drive your SUV though a densely-packed crowd of people you disagree with?