bestone4ever
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2007
- Posts
- 3,208
Please stop.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Any American can be born abroad to US citizens and be a US citizen by birth. But a non-American does not confer that same response.
What response? He wasn't born Abroad. He was born in America, that makes him an American Citizen.
Being born in America does not infer citizenship, it is the parentage that confers citizenship. Foreign citizens can be born here, that doesn't make them American citizens. That's why there's a fight going on about kids of illegal immigrants being born in the US and the whole DACA bullshit....
Being born in America does not infer citizenship, it is the parentage that confers citizenship. Foreign citizens can be born here, that doesn't make them American citizens. That's why there's a fight going on about kids of illegal immigrants being born in the US and the whole DACA bullshit....
Oh wow. This has to be an act. Nobody is really this fucking dumb.
Being born in America does not infer citizenship
It's not inferred. It's outright stated. "Natural Born Citizen." Hawaii was a state when he was born here. He's a natural born citizen.
Clause III of the Foreign Protestants Naturalization Act 1708 provided:[13][14][15]
That the Children of all natural born Subjects born out of the Ligeance of Her Majesty Her Heires and Successors shall be deemed adjudged and taken to be natural born Subjects of this Kingdom to all Intents Constructions and Purposes whatsoever
The Act was repealed (except for the quoted clause III regarding foreign-born children)[16] by the Tories in 1711 by the statute 10 Anne c. 5.[16][17]
Subsequently, the British Nationality Act 1730 provided:
for the explaining the said recited Clause in the said Act . . . [t]hat all Children born out of the Ligeance of the Crown of England, or of Great Britain, or which shall hereafter be born out of such Ligeance, whose Fathers were or shall be natural-born Subjects of the Crown of England, or of Great Britain, at the Time of the Birth of such Children respectively ... are hereby declared to be natural-born Subjects of the Crown of Great Britain, to all Intents, Constructions and Purposes whatsoever.
'Natural born citizen' has its roots in English law.
'Natural born citizen' has its roots in English law...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-citizen_clause
So now Kenya is subject to the Crown of England? That's not American law. England isn't Kenya, nor Hawaii.
Yes, the words Natural, Born, and Citizen are all words, in English. Want me to translate it into German? He wasn't born abroad, and the Crown of England is what America was founded to get away from.
'Natural born citizen' has its roots in English law... this is how the Founders understood and used the term... <geeesh>
Except the part about being subject to the Crown of England you bolded. You don't even understand the word Abroad, and yet you know what the founders understood?
No wait, I'm sure it was a C-section, and therefore not a natural birth. Come on, man.
Now you're sounding liberal.
When you come back, bring with you the law that says anything about the parentage of citizens born here, in America. Not Kenya, and not subject to the crown of England. Yes, I know the point, he was born in America.
Why two definitions, one for congress, another for President?
Andrew Jackson, James Buchanan, Chester A. Arthur, Woodrow Wilson and Herbert Hoover would all be ineligible, by your rule.Why two definitions, one for congress, another for President... it's that fucking simple. <OUT>
Now explain the 14th amendment to him.
Now you're sounding liberal... I'm done for now... you know the point, simply putting your fingers in your ears for the simple sake of being obtuse...