F
Farawyn
Guest
Far... Stop Just STOP.
Nope.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Far... Stop Just STOP.
cost less to maintain
Child of the future:
"can you believe that people used to eat cows! they slaughtered billions of cows a year!"
Cow of the future:
"Barbarians!"
kabobs are a very common way of preparing insects in general, but not all of them would fall through the grill.
back to primalex's point.
Your math seems sound but Con is just parroting scientists and engineers who are already doing it.
There could be a point made about the expense of the types of food in question, with cows being fed irrigated crops, while some types of flies proposed for human consumption could be fed on compost. (not human waste yet.... *gag*)
I don't think anyone is proposing to eat ants specifically.. there's all sorts of problems there. If we were to turn to ants for food, we would almost certainly be harvesting the larvae, because as I already pointed out; shorter lifespan, but I suspect for most breeds of ants there would be a serious concern about containment.
intelligence is not requisite for the vast storage of useless trivia. If I could put it to any use that would be another story.
uh... I mean... thanks for the compliment?
Never underestimate trivia!
Now that I think of it, shrimp are grilled on skewers and they're basically water insects.
uh... noooo.... they aren't... if you'll forgive the nitpicking
Insects are a type of arthropod, as are arachnids and crustaceans (including shrimp)
so... how do I equivocate that statement....
Its a bit like comparing cows to fish, because they are both vertebrates.
Which I imagine is exactly how aliens might lump sum life on earth.
"Fricking bonies."
LOL
I suppose that is kinda how the origins of categorization boil down
Wanna get something to eat? Red Locust brought back their Endless Earwig menu for 2016!
I don't think anyone is proposing to eat ants specifically.. there's all sorts of problems there. If we were to turn to ants for food, we would almost certainly be harvesting the larvae, because as I already pointed out; shorter lifespan = less feed overall, but I suspect for most breeds of ants there would be a serious concern about containment.
uh... noooo.... they aren't... if you'll forgive the nitpicking
Insects are a type of arthropod, as are arachnids and crustaceans (including shrimp)
so... how do I equivocate that statement....
Its a bit like comparing cows to fish, because they are both vertebrates.
Which I imagine is exactly how aliens might lump sum life on earth.
"Fricking bonies."
Fun fact:
TIL having a farawyn inspired avi significantly increases the amount of suggestive PMs
Fun fact:
Mushrooms are more closely related to humans than plants.
I'm pretty sure that the flies most commonly proposed for dietary consumption are fruit flies (?) but in any case, no one was saying anything comes out of thin air. The questions are what exactly are you feeding the animal, how long must you feed the animal before harvest, & how much does it cost to produce that feed? Can the feed be produced locally, can the animal eat what we consider to be waste products (like your point about mushrooms)?
You have a very good point in that insects are hugely wasteful of energy, but this is primarily true of their adult forms, which is just another strong argument for consumption of larvae, in spite of the lower protein content per pound.
much as I dislike mushrooms, that's a relief. I doubt mushroom farming resolves the question of the dietary need for some high protein components however. Half of the issue is resolved just by moving away from the american obsession with over consumption of protein though.
arcology/ generation ship/ planetary colony/ fallout bunker food will likely prove out to best be served in a mix of both mushrooms and insects.
was gonna come back and add "and probably potatoes, if Andy Weir is to be believed at all...
what!? no...
'perpetuating' food is going to be a lot more complex, and would necessarily include all waste from the organisms being supported. To get an apparently perpetual food source, you basically need a "miniature" ecosystem of such size that your own footprint barely makes an impact, and then supplement it to offset your footprint.
the 200 lbs of mushrooms from 100lbs of straw is also drawing mass from ground nutrients and rain or ground ater, and in a closed system that has to be accounted for too.
In fact that's part of the big problem with the bamboo fad. Bamboo grows fast, so it's a "more sustainable" form of lumber & food... right? Turns out we couldn't have possibly been more wrong. Frequent harvesting of bamboo rapidly strips the ground soil of nutrients until nothing will ever grow there again.
vertical farming in hydroponic trays using a solution for optimized nutrient absorption is probably going to be the best we can do for a very long time, but when the nutrient solution runs out; if you haven't figured out some way to make more, you're done growing.
ROFL
I needed that