Two! Four! Six! Eight! JaySecrets Prevaricates!

I have never physically disrespected a woman in my life.
You disrespect women any time you post about women...that's why you're single, that's why you have to buy pussy with cans corns. You think physical action is the only way to disrespect women? Fuck, you're even dumber than I EVER imagined....
 
While under 40% of Americans attend church services weekly, 65% of foster parents do. Barna Research found that practicing Christians are twice as likely to foster or adopt than the general population. They are also more likely to welcome sibling groups, older youth, and children with special needs.Feb 8, 2024


Do Pro-lifers adopt more children than Pro-choice (rs)?



Pro-Life Feminist2y
Do you guys even know how to do proper research? According to the Gladney Center for Adoption, Christians are 12% more likely to seriously consider adopting. Christians are also more than twice as likely to actually adopt a child. And I know that personal experiences aren’t everything, but every single adopted person I know (which is actually quite a few), was raised in a Christian home.

Who Adopts the Most?
If you saw an adoptive parent on the street, would you recognize him or her? Probably not. Adoptive parents come from all walks of life, and it is often dif...
https://adoption.org/who-adopts-the-most
According to the Pew Research Center. 47% of Catholics are pro-life in nearly every circumstance, 63% of Evangelical Protestants are pro-life in nearly every circumstance, 42% of Historically Black Protestants are pro-life in nearly every circumstance, 35% of Mainland Protestants are pro-life in nearly every circumstance, 45% of Orthodox Christians are pro-life in nearly every circumstance, 75% of Jehovah’s Witnesses are pro-life in nearly every circumstance, and 70% of Mormons are pro-life in nearly every circumstance. These numbers are all very high compared to those who are nonreligious (only 23% of them are pro-life in nearly every circumstance). Christians are much more likely to be pro-life than pro-choice. And Christians are also much more likely to adopt than the average adult.


There goes another one of your liberal myths
 
admits to being a deplorable....about time....deplorable!
I literally point out that conservatives are acting in the LEAST deplorable way, by very definition of the values and standards of life we live by, and you use that to say it's an admission of BEING deplo... I seriously can't. You are way too unhinged.
 
According to the Pew Research Center. 47% of Catholics are pro-life in nearly every circumstance,
and how many are foster parents?
63% of Evangelical Protestants are pro-life in nearly every circumstance,
and how many are foster parents?
42% of Historically Black Protestants are pro-life in nearly every circumstance,
and how many are foster parents?
35% of Mainland Protestants are pro-life in nearly every circumstance,
and how many are foster parents?
There goes another one of your liberal myths
So where are the stats on the Pro Choice supporters who also are Foster Parents? That's kind of the point to debate. Not the religious or non religious percentages of Foster parents. Also what the percentage of Americans who would support the required changes to the US social programs to support single mothers for 18 years or so? Show us that percentage.
 
I literally point out that conservatives are acting in the LEAST deplorable way, by very definition of the values and standards of life we live by, and you use that to say it's an admission of BEING deplo... I seriously can't. You are way too unhinged.
Again you fail to understand the term deplorable. Just the same as you will not agree to have a reversible vasectomy, and instead throw all the responsibility on the woman.

Fuck off you self-centered misogynistic religious freak.
 
and how many are foster parents?

and how many are foster parents?

and how many are foster parents?

and how many are foster parents?
Adoptive parents show an even higher level of commitment than foster parents do. To say "but how many bother being foster parents" is disingenuous on its face. Especially after all the comments your side has made, in the abortion debate, claiming pro-lifers don't adopt children.
So where are the stats on the Pro Choice supporters who also are Foster Parents? That's kind of the point to debate. Not the religious or non religious percentages of Foster parents. Also what the percentage of Americans who would support the required changes to the US social programs to support single mothers for 18 years or so? Show us that percentage.
The religious status of the adoptive parents is the tell on their stance on abortion. Again, the "non- religious", and specifically non-Christians, are far more likely to be pro-abortion, the religious, and specifically Christians, are far more likely to be pro-life. That challenge is, again, disingenuous.

But since you want even more stats to destroy your argument...

While under 40% of Americans attend church services weekly, 65% of foster parents do. Barna Research found that practicing Christians are twice as likely to foster or adopt than the general population. They are also more likely to welcome sibling groups, older youth, and children with special needs.
 
While under 40% of Americans attend church services weekly, 65% of foster parents do. Barna Research found that practicing Christians are twice as likely to foster or adopt than the general population. They are also more likely to welcome sibling groups, older youth, and children with special needs.Feb 8, 2024


Do Pro-lifers adopt more children than Pro-choice (rs)?



Pro-Life Feminist2y
Do you guys even know how to do proper research? According to the Gladney Center for Adoption, Christians are 12% more likely to seriously consider adopting. Christians are also more than twice as likely to actually adopt a child. And I know that personal experiences aren’t everything, but every single adopted person I know (which is actually quite a few), was raised in a Christian home.

Who Adopts the Most?
If you saw an adoptive parent on the street, would you recognize him or her? Probably not. Adoptive parents come from all walks of life, and it is often dif...
https://adoption.org/who-adopts-the-most
According to the Pew Research Center. 47% of Catholics are pro-life in nearly every circumstance, 63% of Evangelical Protestants are pro-life in nearly every circumstance, 42% of Historically Black Protestants are pro-life in nearly every circumstance, 35% of Mainland Protestants are pro-life in nearly every circumstance, 45% of Orthodox Christians are pro-life in nearly every circumstance, 75% of Jehovah’s Witnesses are pro-life in nearly every circumstance, and 70% of Mormons are pro-life in nearly every circumstance. These numbers are all very high compared to those who are nonreligious (only 23% of them are pro-life in nearly every circumstance). Christians are much more likely to be pro-life than pro-choice. And Christians are also much more likely to adopt than the average adult.


There goes another one of your liberal myths
Now tell how many gay couples adopt.
 
Again you fail to understand the term deplorable. Just the same as you will not agree to have a reversible vasectomy, and instead throw all the responsibility on the woman.

Fuck off you self-centered misogynistic religious freak.
Let me speak slowly in easy words so you can understand:

If you aren't out there boinking women you aren't married to, you aren't going to be getting them pregnant. If you aren't getting women pregnant, you aren't putting any responsibility on women. It's how biology works.

You cannot seriously be this dumb.
 
Let me speak slowly in easy words so you can understand:

If you aren't out there boinking women you aren't married to, you aren't going to be getting them pregnant. If you aren't getting women pregnant, you aren't putting any responsibility on women. It's how biology works.

You cannot seriously be this dumb.
But you’re the guy who believes that virgins can get pregnant.
 
At this point you are deflecting. Again, the stats speak for themselves. Mostly Christian. And if you don't like those stats, that's not my fault. The numbers don't lie here.
I’m so shocked that we found yet another topic you don’t want to address.
 
But you’re the guy who believes that virgins can get pregnant.
A virgin. In a miraculous act of God because God coming in flesh had to be the second Adam, the seed of a woman. But then, I have no problem with "In the beginning God created..." After that, if God decides to intervene in the laws of the nature He created, that's not an issue.

But that is simply deflecting, isn't it. Because you have again been shown to have no valid argument. So you go to mocking your opponent's Christian faith. You just exposed yourself as not having a leg to stand on. Again.
 
A virgin. In a miraculous act of God because God coming in flesh had to be the second Adam, the seed of a woman. But then, I have no problem with "In the beginning God created..." After that, if God decides to intervene in the laws of the nature He created, that's not an issue.

But that is simply deflecting, isn't it. Because you have again been shown to have no valid argument. So you go to mocking your opponent's Christian faith. You just exposed yourself as not having a leg to stand on. Again.
Who is mocking your faith. I’m simply stating a fact. You do believe a virgin can get pregnant, correct?
 
I’m so shocked that we found yet another topic you don’t want to address.
It was literally addressed in the stats. Not engaging with you any further. You just ignore answers then pretend you haven't been answered. If you want the stats, look them up. They are easily found.
 
It was literally addressed in the stats. Not engaging with you any further. You just ignore answers then pretend you haven't been answered. If you want the stats, look them up. They are easily found.
In no way did you address this. Im really shocked that you won’t discuss things that you bring up.
 
Who is mocking your faith. I’m simply stating a fact. You do believe a virgin can get pregnant, correct?
I believe A virgin BECAME pregnant by a singular, specific, special act of God that was prophesied several times thousands of years before the event. I believe God did this to come into this world to come as the Perfect Man to live and die as the sacrifice for your sins and mine, and to become the Perfect Forever Representative for men who receive the gift of His sacrifice. I believe he did this because He loves you. And I believe that there will be no more virgins conceiving because He isn't coming as a sacrifice again. He already did it once for all.
 
I believe A virgin BECAME pregnant by a singular, specific, special act of God that was prophesied several times thousands of years before the event. I believe God did this to come into this world to come as the Perfect Man to live and die as the sacrifice for your sins and mine, and to become the Perfect Forever Representative for men who receive the gift of His sacrifice. I believe he did this because He loves you. And I believe that there will be no more virgins conceiving because He isn't coming as a sacrifice again. He already did it once for all.
So the answer is yes. Thanks for clarifying that you believe women can become pregnant without having sex.
 
In no way did you address this. Im really shocked that you won’t discuss things that you bring up.
You brought up GAY adoption, not me. And that's not what was being discussed. It was conservative and pro-life adoption and foster parenting. I have no interest in playing the circular game you play on here. Goodbye.
 
So the answer is yes. Thanks for clarifying that you believe women can become pregnant without having sex.
Again, in one specific instance. Where God had said long before that it would happen. Genesis says Messiah would come as "the seed of a woman", and the most famous prophesy is, "Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bare a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us."
 
So the answer is yes. Thanks for clarifying that you believe women can become pregnant without having sex.
Again, in one specific instance. Where God had said long before that it would happen. Genesis says Messiah would come as "the seed of a woman", and the most famous prophesy is, "Behold, a virgin shall conceive and bare a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us."
 
god only came once

And she wasn't even aware.
Your blasphemy is noted. Interesting how quickly a lack of argument in the face of the facts drives your side to mocking Christians for their faith.
 
Your blasphemy is noted. Interesting how quickly a lack of argument in the face of the facts drives your side to mocking Christians for their faith.
I mock all religious people for their faith. Your religion is just a bigger target because there's more of you.

You've never provided a valid argument.
 
So the answer is yes. Thanks for clarifying that you believe women can become pregnant without having sex.
And your framing ignores what the belief is. I don't believe WOMEN CAN become (present tense, plural) pregnant without sex. I believe A WOMAN DID (past tense, singular) become pregnant without sex. It's grammar. Maybe learn how to use it properly.
 
Back
Top