clearly "died out 65 million years ago
You obviously didn't look at the evidence presented in the videos
I did. No anthropologist was in the video. Christian pastors aren't skilled at fossil analysis.
https://www.jonathanpark.com/blogs/journal/86987521-modern-day-scientists-who-believe-in-creation
Lol, you're not proving anything here. The videos you posted were layman's analysis of shit they see. "Why does pottery have dinosaurs?" Is not proof of dinosaurs and humans existing together.....it's literally just someone leaping to conclusions based on incomplete information.
And these are scientists with actual degrees and experience beyond what you will ever have... But sure.
Yes, the overwhelming number (north of 99.8% in the proper fields) of scientists agree that creationism is not a science and that the theory of evolution is supported.
I’m not the one starving children or giving them cancer. We agreed that God does that.
he's one of them, a goddamned creationist
at one time, my husband's grandchildren were being taught that shit in school, and how the reason we find dino fossil bones all over the world is because of the Big Flood spreading them around.
And you are a expert with degrees in.... what?
Spoken like a person who very likely has done nothing personally to be individually invested in helping hungry children.
No the punctuation was wrong, and thus open for my interpretation. I'm not getting into it where I was wrong because you fucked up.
That still doesn’t address what I wrote.
Aside from my forgetting the end quote, the punctuation was perfectly clear... to anyone not being obtuse. And even without the end quote, the context made the intention clear. Then again, your side has always had a problem with context. It's too inconvenient for your tastes.
lol, sure, and you seem to have a habit for victimism .
How did God parting the sea for Moses take away free will?
I suggest you actually open the Book and read it for yourself. All the way. Honestly. I suggest beginning with Romans and John, then Genesis (you don't have to deal with the "begats" if you don't want to
). After that the rest of the Gospels in the New Testament (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) and the history books in the Old Testament. Then go from there. If you are asking honest questions, I suggest you go to the Source for the answers. If not, well you are just wasting time, and making yourself more accountable for the answers you get when you reject the answers.
Ok, so you agree that God can feed hungry children without taking away free will. Thanks.I suggest you actually open the Book and read it for yourself. All the way. Honestly. I suggest beginning with Romans and John, then Genesis (you don't have to deal with the "begats" if you don't want to
Not only the parting of the sea, there was manna from Heaven that saved the Jews and later son fed His crowds at a religious rally with a miracle.
What I agree with is that one should probably read the Book before he critiques its claims. If I spoke of Marxism, but had never read Marx or the Manifesto, I would be disingenuous in my comments. If I spoke of my issues with the evolutionary theory, but hadn't read and listened to what evolution actually claimed and the words of evolutionists when challenged, then I would have no grounds. When you speak of the Bible and its claims, but haven't studied it for yourself, your comments are just repeating what others said.
At least we both agree you’re wrong.
