America white supremist nation

[BotanyBoy]

The lack of discrimination directed towards you is as much a benefit as any thing tangible.

LOL lack of discrimination?

HAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA!!

You poor, poor, poor downtrodden white males.

FFS it's pathetic you babies.

I'm not white and I never claimed white males were downtrodden.

Just that I don't think minorities and women are.

For all the LIBERDEE!!!!! talk, libertarians are really fascists when you scratch the skin.

Libertarians are fascists how?

Oh wait you don't know what libertarians are and just use the term as a label for "shit I don't like" kinda the way you do with capitalism which you can't define either.

 

[underguy1]

Get back under your bridge, filthy racist troll.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Get back under your bridge, filthy racist troll.

Yep that's what I thought

God forbid you ever explain yourself or support some of your insane claims. Name calling is way more productive!!

 

[underguy1]

Oh wait you don't know what libertarians are and just use the term as a label for "shit I don't like" kinda the way you do with capitalism which you can't define either.

You have a stock standard conventional neoclassical view of how capitalism works. It is wrong.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBR3UpBMUk

 

[BotanyBoy]

You have a stock standard conventional neoclassical view of how capitalism works. It is wrong.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8yBR3UpBMUk

You can't even define the word how the fuck do you know my views on it?

LMAO!!

All you've ever done is assign me views, called me childish names and then told me that the vies YOU made up for me, were wrong.

 

[underguy1]

Once again, it is a waste of time attempting to deal with an irrational troll.

Non-stop whining and victimhood.

 

[Jacques_Corbin]

So what you are saying is, he is better at sounding like he knows what he is talking about rather than actually knowing what he is talking about?

 

[underguy1]

So what you are saying is, he is better at sounding like he knows what he is talking about rather than actually knowing what he is talking about?

He's a troll. What he says now is worthless because he'll deny it and have a different view in the space of two comments.

It is all about annoying people and wrecking reasonable discussion.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Once again, it is a waste of time attempting to deal with an irrational troll.

Non-stop whining and victimhood.

Oh look...more name calling.

God forbid you try and have a discussion.

So what you are saying is, he is better at sounding like he knows what he is talking about rather than actually knowing what he is talking about?

That works.

It pretty much talks a bunch of shit, doesn't back a shred of it up, then assigns you a position and berates you for it.

 

[underguy1]

You could always try to refute Steve Keen.

But you won't because you are an ignorant, ill-educated, right wing, racist troll.

 

[BotanyBoy]

You could always try to refute Steve Keen.

But you won't because you are an ignorant, ill-educated, right wing, racist troll.

No, I won't be doing anything so long as the childish name calling continues.

 

[underguy1]

If you like being called a troll, stop trolling you cunt.

I doubt that you can stop being a cunt though. It seems to be your innate nature.

 

[BotanyBoy]

If you like being called a troll, stop trolling you cunt.

I doubt that you can stop being a cunt though. It seems to be your innate nature.

Maybe it has something to do with your compulsive name calling and puerile conversation tactics.......

 

[underguy1]

Nope. It's definitely because you are a childish, whining, right wing, racist know-it-all, know nothing, perpetual victim cunt.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Nope. It's definitely because you are a childish, whining, right wing, racist know-it-all, know nothing, perpetual victim cunt.

I know I don't totally agree with you.

That's not a reason to call me names instead of having adult conversations.

 

[Beco]

America's black president and its white supremacy

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/racism-america-election-obama-clinton-1.3791033

Mention white supremacy in America the next time the conversation turns to the U.S. presidential election, and watch what happens. Heads avert, a few eyes roll, and the conversation resumes, unruffled, after a few polite smiles.

The phrase is regarded as extreme — a gross exaggeration of problems America has, after all, tried to solve. Why, the president of the United States himself is black, and he never uses terms like white supremacy. Which is interesting in itself, because it goes to show the extent to which the American polity is gamed for white ascendancy.

Even a black leader cannot mention systemic discrimination against black Americans without nodding sympathetically to the grievances of white Americans, many of whom believe they are the victims in a politically correct world that values "diversity" over (their) merit.

The very word diversity is seen by millions of Americans as code for quotas and reverse discrimination. White conservatives talk wistfully about "colourblindness," something they seem persuaded actually exists.

Prof. Eddie Glaude, dean of the department of African American and religious studies at no less an institution than Princeton University, politely offers the following definition of white supremacy in America: "The belief that white people matter more than others."

In his rather ironically titled book, Democracy in Black, Glaude puts forth a powerful argument that white supremacy — racism — is not an aberration, the thoughts and actions of a hateful few, but rather a value baked into American democracy from its inception.

The founders, Glaude points out, were capable of jarring cognitive dissonance; even as they created a shining city on the hill with freedom and justice for all, they owned slaves. They saw no contradiction in that. And, writes Glaude, that disjoint continues to this day.

"Think about it this way," he writes. "When communists declare that Stalinism wasn't really communism, or when Christians and Muslims say that the horrific things some Christians and Muslims have done in the name of their religion isn't really Christianity or Islam, what are they doing? They are protecting their ideology…"

Likewise, he says, Americans separate the pristine ideal of America from its ugly realities: "We keep treating America like we have a great blueprint and we've just strayed from it. But the fact is we've built this country true. Black folks were never meant to be full-fledged participants."
Black Americans are harassed and killed by police and imprisoned in grossly disproportionate numbers. They are much poorer, twice as unemployed, more uneducated, and lead the nation in deadly diseases.

There is really only one explanation for that, unless you actually believe blacks are more intrinsically criminal, sick and stupid.

Blacks are constantly blamed for their own suffering, and Donald Trump is trying to ride that shibboleth right to the White House.

One of his campaign architects is Steve Bannon, the former head of the Breitbart website — which seems to relish singling out blacks for all sorts of sins, accuses Black Lives Matter activists of encouraging cop-killers and obsesses about "black crime" and "black-on-black crime."

(Yes, it is true most crime against blacks is perpetrated by blacks. And most crime against whites is perpetrated by whites. But there are no accounts of "white-on-white" crime.)

What's remarkable, though, is the crashing silence from Democrats about the life of black people in America. Hillary Clinton largely ignores them, concentrating instead on appealing to Republicans disaffected by Trump's loopiness. It's politically shrewd, perhaps; a politician has to prioritize for maximum effect, and blacks have been a reliable Democratic constituency for decades.

"All lives matter," Clinton admonished a black congregation several months ago, using what has since become a white-resentment code phrase.

God, enough already......

 

[The_Trouvere]

Coming from you, I'll take that as a compliment. Really do want to be as far away from where you think you are as possible.

What have I said about blacks that is not true?

 

[The_Trouvere]

Get back under your bridge, filthy racist troll.

Yep that's what I thought

God forbid you ever explain yourself or support some of your insane claims. Name calling is way more productive!!

 

[richmondman]

I can understand why people feel sorry for Negroes. I cannot understand why anyone respects them. What is there to respect about a race that is characterized everywhere in the world by stupidity, crime, and illegitimacy?

What have Negroes contributed to American civilization? Popular songs, and some good fiction. That is about it.

Nevertheless, Negro novelists only write about white racism. They only articulate racial self pity. A great novelist exposes the flaws in his own culture, the way Voltaire and Sinclair Lewis did. Where is the Negro novelist who even acknowledges the deficiencies of his race?

And there, in one perfect quotation, is the White Supremacist position.

 

[underguy1]

I know I don't totally agree with you.

That's not a reason to call me names instead of having adult conversations.

Then stop trolling me.

 

[Jacques_Corbin]

Well, to name one Aaron McGruder.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Then stop trolling me.

I'm asking you to explain yourself or back up your claims.

That's not me trolling.

If it's a troll it's only because you set yourself up and trolled yourself.

 

[The_Trouvere]

And there, in one perfect quotation, is the White Supremacist position.

I believe that Orientals are racially superior to white Gentiles, and that Ashkenazi Jews are racially superior to Orientals. I am a white Gentile.

 

[The_Trouvere]

And there, in one perfect quotation, is the White Supremacist position.

I believe that Orientals are racially superior to white Gentiles, and that Ashkenazi Jews are racially superior to Orientals. I am a white Gentile.

But whatever I am, what do you have to say in response to my claims? Where is the evidence that the Negro race is intrinsically equal to the white race?

 

[The_Trouvere]

I know I don't totally agree with you.

That's not a reason to call me names instead of having adult conversations.

underguy1 is only capable of insults and name calling.