Biden's Legacy

So we agree Ford’s pardon of Nixon was in fact preemptive. 👍

Nah. Nixon was cornered on that one. Although looking at it objectively, what the Obama Administration did to Trump, spying on him, was way worse than Nixon.

Looking back, Trump should have pardoned Obama and Hillary pre-emptively. LOL The exploding heads would have been great to see.

Because we know now that we can treat Presidential Pardons as a joke, and not to be seriously considered.
 
I've already had several arguments this morning about why his pardons should not be acceptable and all of them did not address Biden's actions...and instead were focused on other people.

I'm sick of arguing this shit - either argue Biden's actions of STFU.
 
I've already had several arguments this morning about why his pardons should not be acceptable and all of them did not address Biden's actions...and instead were focused on other people.

I'm sick of arguing this shit - either argue Biden's actions of STFU.
Be kind, ya damned "Rob alt", these are the last few hours they'll get to clutch their pearls about President Biden for four years. Let them blow off some steam before reality sets in and they're forced to blow the Orange Toadstool. :cautious:
 
Be kind, ya damned "Rob alt", these are the last few hours they'll get to clutch their pearls about President Biden for four years. Let them blow off some steam before reality sets in and they're forced to blow the Orange Toadstool. :cautious:
Yah, I see that you didn't understand my point.
 
Noooooo, the Spice Girls dates you, dude.

I am what I am!!

Make it a Black Pink t-shirt at least.
Spice World Tour shirt is wearing thin.....

I've considered replacing it with
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71oSSb6pBgL._AC_UY1000_.jpg
Or of you want to go retro, Bananarama. They were much better than the Spice Girls.

Nah I'm a 90's kid all the way.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/njC2RHo194Y/sddefault.jpg
 
I've already had several arguments this morning about why his pardons should not be acceptable and all of them did not address Biden's actions...and instead were focused on other people.

I'm sick of arguing this shit - either argue Biden's actions of STFU.

BUTT.....BUTT.....ORANGE MAN BAD!!
 
I've already had several arguments this morning about why his pardons should not be acceptable and all of them did not address Biden's actions...and instead were focused on other people.

I'm sick of arguing this shit - either argue Biden's actions of STFU.

You claimed Biden’s pardons were precedent setting and unique. I just pointed out they aren’t, and that upset you. 👍
 
I'm incredibly disappointed in Biden.

Once again, the man who told us all about the danger to democracy that exists in the upcoming administration has provided his successor with the ammunition to do whatever he wants and expects that we should blame 45/47 for it.

His legacy will include providing cover for the shit that we will get for the next guy. He has given him excuse after excuse and still believes his shit doesn't stink.

People who excuse this behavior are not worthy of response...fuck off.
 
I believe the “Biden Good” thread is a vital starting point for my overall opinion on this administration. Biden ran circles around the previous administration in terms of accomplishments and I believe, all told, that those positive results will still stand even adding into whatever this incoming administration may happen to tout. For mitigating the loss of American lives due to the negligence of the previous administration not instituting a vaccine protocol, the Biden administration, IMO, will always be viewed as an overall success. I will not entertain those members who choose to cherry pick what I will now post as my criticisms of the Biden ministration.

President Biden bothered me to know end in the fact that he was an institutionalist. He watched front row 8 years of Republican obstruction of his and President Obama‘s agenda, and still felt that things could always be different if he just reached out his hand across the aisle. He believed too much in the good ole boy early 30 years of his statesmanship rather than taking serious the changes occurring the last 20 years or so.

He couldn’t, with adequate success, relay to the American people his numerous achievements. Yet another failing, IMO, he should have been taught by the Obama presidency. Pete Buttigieg, with no disrespect to the two White House spokespeople nor his service heading DOT, should’ve been designated a position in relaying his administration’s message strictly to television.

He allowed trump appointees that he could have gotten rid of to stay on, denying his administration a sign to progressives the low hanging fruit to argue real change was occurring.

I do not know how Merrick Garland would’ve been as a Supreme Court justice. But I do know that his appointment was made to that court to placate moderate Republicans. I do not like the Democratic Party playing to the hands of Republicans. Garland was a weak Attorney General. Numerous congressman asked, begged trump for pardons before he left office; on the night of and after the January 6th insurrection, every single member of the Republican house voted not to certify the election. These actions should have warranted, at the very least, an ethics probe if not charges of sedition. Biden and the incoming democratic majority continue the annoying and long-standing tradition from the civil war to Iraq of allowing those who would undermine, lie to, and harm democracy to get away with their deeds only to then watch them feel emboldened to come back and do it again - looking squarely at you incoming congress.

I have no problems with any of the Biden pardons. None whatsoever, especially since the Supreme Court ruling allowing the executive branch to practically do whatever. I wanna be clear here: anyone in a minority class, voting Republican is self hating. What those pardons did though was show these classes that Biden promised to protect them and that he instead was able to protect himself and his family, but not them. He gave fodder to those who always claim, wrongly, that voting republican means that you are an off of the plantation free thinker.

Those are most of the criticisms I think go with the Biden legacy.
 
Last edited:
I believe the “Biden Good” thread is a vital starting point for my overall opinion on this administration. Biden ran circles around the previous administration in terms of accomplishments and I believe, all told, that those positive results will still stand even adding into whatever this incoming administration may happen to tout. For mitigating the loss of American lives due to the negligence of the previous administration not instituting a vaccine protocol, the Biden administration, IMO, will always be viewed as an overall success. I will not entertain those members who choose to cherry pick what I will now post as my criticisms of the Biden ministration.

President Biden bothered me to know end in the fact that he was an institutionalist. He watched front row 8 years of Republican obstruction of his and President Obama‘s agenda, and still felt that things could always be different if he just reached out his hand across the aisle. He believed too much in the good ole boy early 30 years of his statesmanship rather than taking serious the changes occurring the last 20 years or so.

He couldn’t, with adequate success, relay to the American people his numerous achievements. Yet another failing, IMO, he should have been taught by the Obama presidency. Pete Buttigieg, with no disrespect to the two White House spokespeople nor his service heading DOT, should’ve been designated a position in relaying his administration’s message strictly to television.

He allowed trump appointees that he could have gotten rid of to stay on, denying his administration a sign to progressives the low hanging fruit to argue real change was occurring.

I do not know how Merrick Garland would’ve been as a Supreme Court justice. But I do know that his appointment was made to that court to placate moderate Republicans. I do not like the Democratic Party playing to the hands of Republicans. Garland was a weak Attorney General. Numerous congressman asked, begged trump for pardons before he left office; on the night of and after the January 6th insurrection, every single member of the Republican house voted not to certify the election. These actions should have warranted, at the very least, an ethics probe if not charges of sedition. Biden and the incoming democratic majority continue the annoying and long-standing tradition from the civil war to Iraq of allowing those who would undermine, lie to, and harm democracy to get away with their deeds only to then watch them feel emboldened to come back and do it again - looking squarely at you incoming congress.

I have no problems with any of the Biden pardons. None whatsoever, especially since the Supreme Court ruling allowing the executive branch to practically do whatever I wanna be clear here: anyone in a minority class, Republican is self hating. What those pardons did though was so these classes that Biden promised to protect that he was able to protect himself and his family, but not them. He gave father to those who always claim, wrongly, that voting republican means that you are an off of the plantation free thinker.

Those are most of the criticisms I think go with the Biden legacy.
This is an incredibly thoughtful comment and I appreciate the entirety of it.

Thank you.
 
I believe the “Biden Good” thread is a vital starting point for my overall opinion on this administration. Biden ran circles around the previous administration in terms of accomplishments and I believe, all told, that those positive results will still stand even adding into whatever this incoming administration may happen to tout. For mitigating the loss of American lives due to the negligence of the previous administration not instituting a vaccine protocol, the Biden administration, IMO, will always be viewed as an overall success. I will not entertain those members who choose to cherry pick what I will now post as my criticisms of the Biden ministration.

President Biden bothered me to know end in the fact that he was an institutionalist. He watched front row 8 years of Republican obstruction of his and President Obama‘s agenda, and still felt that things could always be different if he just reached out his hand across the aisle. He believed too much in the good ole boy early 30 years of his statesmanship rather than taking serious the changes occurring the last 20 years or so.

He couldn’t, with adequate success, relay to the American people his numerous achievements. Yet another failing, IMO, he should have been taught by the Obama presidency. Pete Buttigieg, with no disrespect to the two White House spokespeople nor his service heading DOT, should’ve been designated a position in relaying his administration’s message strictly to television.

He allowed trump appointees that he could have gotten rid of to stay on, denying his administration a sign to progressives the low hanging fruit to argue real change was occurring.

I do not know how Merrick Garland would’ve been as a Supreme Court justice. But I do know that his appointment was made to that court to placate moderate Republicans. I do not like the Democratic Party playing to the hands of Republicans. Garland was a weak Attorney General. Numerous congressman asked, begged trump for pardons before he left office; on the night of and after the January 6th insurrection, every single member of the Republican house voted not to certify the election. These actions should have warranted, at the very least, an ethics probe if not charges of sedition. Biden and the incoming democratic majority continue the annoying and long-standing tradition from the civil war to Iraq of allowing those who would undermine, lie to, and harm democracy to get away with their deeds only to then watch them feel emboldened to come back and do it again - looking squarely at you incoming congress.

I have no problems with any of the Biden pardons. None whatsoever, especially since the Supreme Court ruling allowing the executive branch to practically do whatever I wanna be clear here: anyone in a minority class, voting Republican is self hating. What those pardons did though was so these classes that Biden promised to protect that he was able to protect himself and his family, but not them. He gave father to those who always claim, wrongly, that voting republican means that you are an off of the plantation free thinker.

Those are most of the criticisms I think go with the Biden legacy.

Fair enough; but imagine if President Biden hadn’t offered the olive branch of bipartisanship:

Probably no infrastructure bill or other significant pieces of legislation.

😳

President Biden played the Washington game - for better or worse. I say for better.

👍

🇺🇸

Failure to better communicate his administration’s accomplishments and to assign some culpability to DonOld’s administration for inflation, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Gaza, etc, WAS a failure of epic proportions, but President Biden was at the mercy of the corporate media who did little to amplify his accomplishments or DonOld’s culpability for inflation, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Gaza, etc.

It is what it is.

🇺🇸
 
Fair enough; but imagine if President Biden hadn’t offered the olive branch of bipartisanship:

Probably no infrastructure bill or other significant pieces of legislation.

😳

President Biden played the Washington game - for better or worse. I say for better.

👍

🇺🇸

Failure to better communicate his administration’s accomplishments and to assign some culpability to DonOld’s administration for inflation, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Gaza, etc, WAS a failure of epic proportions, but President Biden was at the mercy of the corporate media who did little to amplify his accomplishments or DonOld’s culpability for inflation, Afghanistan, Ukraine, Gaza, etc.

It is what it is.

🇺🇸


You’re right and my post was lengthy enough that I should apologize for me not to put in that nuance. His administration accomplished so much with the slimmest of majorities. This incoming administration will not have the VP burdened with sitting over Congress. This incoming administration will not have two openly turncoat republicans in the Senate. I will let this correction stand to also say that I still believe that this incoming administration won’t accomplish as much as the Biden administration.
 
You’re right and my post was lengthy enough that I should apologize for me not to put in that nuance. His administration accomplished so much with the slimmest of majorities. This incoming administration will not have the VP burdened with sitting over Congress. This incoming administration will not have two openly turncoat republicans in the Senate. I will let this correction stand to also say that I still believe that this incoming administration won’t accomplish as much as the Biden administration.

Excellent observations.

Agree 💯

👍
 
Sometimes I REAKKY enjoy the Daily Mail. Far better than most US media and almost balanced.
Daily Mail:

The Daily Mail (a.k.a. Hate Mail, Daily Fail, Daily Heil, Daily Moan, Crazy Mail, and so on) is a reactionary right-wing tabloid rag masquerading as a "traditional values" middle-class newspaper that is, in many ways, the second-worst of the British gutter press (only Rupert Murdoch's The Sun is worse). The Mail has been so consistently bad that Orwell called them out in Homage to Catalonia for supporting Franco.[1]:199,207 The Mail has also infamously supported Oswald Mosley and fascism.

The Daily Mail is to the UK what the New York Post is to the United States, and what the Drudge Report is to the Internet: to wit, gossipy tabloid "journalism" for those who cannot digest serious news, with a flippantly wingnut editorial stance. Like the Daily Express, it tries to appear more upmarket and respectable than the red-top British tabloids, though it does sometimes go in for the full front-page picture or headline characteristic of the populist rags. It is also notorious for its frequent harassmenthttps://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/Wikipedia%27s_W.svg/12px-Wikipedia%27s_W.svg.png of individuals, campaigns of hate directed at various minorities (often people who are Muslim or transgender), and willfully deceiving and lying to its readers.

Much of its content is designed to trigger readers' limbic systems, so articles generate strong emotions of hate, fear, anger, sadness, disgust, and occasionally happiness (usually because a white middle-class person has done something nice, or kittens). Like trout in a fish farm pond, readers wait for the Daily Mail to fling the next story to them about ne'er-do-wells smirking, scruffy women in tracksuits smoking outside court (where they face charges of drunken assault or benefit fraud), brown people and assorted foreigners doing the things that they do, lefties campaigning about something, or working class people enjoying themselves in a non-approved way. Then the readership erupts into a foaming fury that quickly subsides as they wait for the next story. But the fury doesn't completely subside; it leaves a residual anger that simmers in the background and requires another trigger story to allow it to boil over once more.
 
Back
Top