Disney Checkmates DeSantis

What do you want to bet that he'd argue to the high heavens about "regulating" CEO compensation.

Lol, I did once at a mock mediation session.

Think about it. Why are corporations allowed to have overhead costs to the extent they do? Charitable orgs get rated for how much % of the donations get sent for "the cause" but corps have no responsibility to do that. There's nothing, outside of consumer pressure, to prevent them from charging sky high prices just to pay exorbitant overhead perks and salaries. Which, incidentally, lower the taxes corp's have to pay. And, depending on how the compensation is structured, the CEO's don't pay taxes on it either.


Of course, you probably thought I'd argue against regulating CEO compensation completely. Didn't you? C'mon, admit it. That's what you thought, right?
 
Lol, I did once at a mock mediation session.

Think about it. Why are corporations allowed to have overhead costs to the extent they do? Charitable orgs get rated for how much % of the donations get sent for "the cause" but corps have no responsibility to do that. There's nothing, outside of consumer pressure, to prevent them from charging sky high prices just to pay exorbitant overhead perks and salaries. Which, incidentally, lower the taxes corp's have to pay. And, depending on how the compensation is structured, the CEO's don't pay taxes on it either.


Of course, you probably thought I'd argue against regulating CEO compensation completely. Didn't you? C'mon, admit it. That's what you thought, right?
^
Fucking Marxist commie socialist neo-Maoist liberal.

🙄

👉 Harpy 🤣

🇺🇸
 

Harpy would a
What do you want to bet that he'd argue to the high heavens about "regulating" CEO compensation.

Harpy would argue either side depending on who was paying,

That ^ is why Harpy’s opinion can be so easily dismissed on nearly all matters.

There is no moral center there.

Truth and justice are transactional for garbage individuals like Harpy. (“Hack Lawyers”)

*nods*
 
Lol, I did once at a mock mediation session.

Think about it. Why are corporations allowed to have overhead costs to the extent they do? Charitable orgs get rated for how much % of the donations get sent for "the cause" but corps have no responsibility to do that. There's nothing, outside of consumer pressure, to prevent them from charging sky high prices just to pay exorbitant overhead perks and salaries. Which, incidentally, lower the taxes corp's have to pay. And, depending on how the compensation is structured, the CEO's don't pay taxes on it either.


Of course, you probably thought I'd argue against regulating CEO compensation completely. Didn't you? C'mon, admit it. That's what you thought, right?

Given your past and your ideologies that you have demonstrated, I am going to reserve judgement for when something like this actually comes into play. Suffice to say that your words do not hold much weight given your history. That's just reality.
 
Given your past and your ideologies that you have demonstrated, I am going to reserve judgement for when something like this actually comes into play. Suffice to say that your words do not hold much weight given your history. That's just reality.

The fact that you refuse to believe me only illustrates that you're locked into an ideology which mandates that you refute anything outside of what you want to believe. Reality holds no sway over your worldview.

Yet the truth exists. I have argued on behalf of all kinds of progressive ideas in my life. I have represented people when no one else would because they were deemed "unacceptable" or "unworthy" to normal society.

I no longer choose to do those things because I got tired of being spit on by my colleagues as well as those whom I represented. Because it seems those who adhere to your ideology are not only mentally defective, they're also ingrates.
 
The fact that you refuse to believe me only illustrates that you're locked into an ideology which mandates that you refute anything outside of what you want to believe. Reality holds no sway over your worldview.

Yet the truth exists. I have argued on behalf of all kinds of progressive ideas in my life. I have represented people when no one else would because they were deemed "unacceptable" or "unworthy" to normal society.

I no longer choose to do those things because I got tired of being spit on by my colleagues as well as those whom I represented. Because it seems those who adhere to your ideology are not only mentally defective, they're also ingrates.
You're a Lawyer, getting spat upon goes with the job....
 
The fact that you refuse to believe me only illustrates that you're locked into an ideology which mandates that you refute anything outside of what you want to believe. Reality holds no sway over your worldview.

Yet the truth exists. I have argued on behalf of all kinds of progressive ideas in my life. I have represented people when no one else would because they were deemed "unacceptable" or "unworthy" to normal society.

I no longer choose to do those things because I got tired of being spit on by my colleagues as well as those whom I represented. Because it seems those who adhere to your ideology are not only mentally defective, they're also ingrates.
No. It illustrates your long history, documented on this site, of being a conservative especially when it comes to anything that "owns the libs."

Like I said before, I reserve the right to make that judgment when and if the time comes. That's more generous than you deserve.
 
No. It illustrates your long history, documented on this site, of being a conservative especially when it comes to anything that "owns the libs."

Like I said before, I reserve the right to make that judgment when and if the time comes. That's more generous than you deserve.

I have a documented history of proving that you lie, bullshit, and spread fake news.

That you don't like being exposed isn't my concern. Nor is the idea that you can rewrite the real world history of someone you've never met merely based on a dislike of someone's posts on the internet.
 
DeSantis-backed board will pay $6.5 million in legal fees as it battles Disney

The amount is more than triple what the district typically pays.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/23/disney-district-legal-fees-desantis-00112464
Hmmm and who will be on the hook, tax payers.

Nazi Ron likes to have the tax payers take care of all of his things…travel…legal…and he’s a good salesman- Gets them to want to do it too.

His run to bring Florida to the whole country is in the pit with no crew. But he just keeps making v’room v’room sounds from the car anyway.
 
Hmmm and who will be on the hook, tax payers.

Nazi Ron likes to have the tax payers take care of all of his things…travel…legal…and he’s a good salesman- Gets them to want to do it too.

His run to bring Florida to the whole country is in the pit with no crew. But he just keeps making v’room v’room sounds from the car anyway.
And all because Disney has a diverse workforce. That's it.

Disney was fine when he wanted a place to get married but when he worked out that he had to rile up the fascists in the electorate (and they vote), he invented a battle with his state's largest capitalist employer - and the biggest tourist trap in a state that depends on tourism.

If you wrote a book with that as a storyline nobody would believe it.
 
I'd love to be a fly on the trailer wall when the MAGAts tell little Johnny that the family trip to DisneyWorld is canceled because Mickey likes rainbows and uses preferred pronouns.

Seriously. How does that conversation go? "Little Johnny, you can never watch Mickey Mouse Clubhouse ever again!"
 
Everyone knows if you drink a drink poured...or eat some food made by a gay person...you can become gay
 
Democrats are smart enough to be vaccinated.

Lol.

Do you actually not understand how much what you posted is an agreement with what I said?

Democrats are GULLIBLE. That's why you believe that a novel untested vax "saved you" from the evil China Virus. Except it didn't. You still caught the virus anyway. And transmitted it to everyone else, even others who got the jab. And then you ran to get "boosted" and still caught the virus again and again and again. And gave it to your loved ones and friends again too. More boosters, more jabs, more anything/everything you could do to "save yourself" while the people just like you DIED ANYWAY. They died from Covid, they died from heart inflammation, they died from adverse reactions to the vax.

And yet you still believe that getting the jab was such a good thing that the mere mention of a new variant has you scrambling to find your next booster.

Meanwhile those who weren't jabbed survived without those complications just like you did. Amazing coincidence that.

And now you post about how "everyone knows" that drinking/eating something served by a gay person makes you gay.

Which is true but only if you're a democrat. Because you're GULLIBLE and you believe.
 
Democrats are GULLIBLE. That's why you believe that a novel untested vax "saved you" from the evil China Virus. Except it didn't. You still caught the virus anyway.
It was tested more than any other vaccine in history.

It saved millions of people from dying from the virus and just as many from long term ill effects of the virus.

This is a fact...belief isn't necessary unless.you don't believe facts.
 
It was tested more than any other vaccine in history.

It saved millions of people from dying from the virus and just as many from long term ill effects of the virus.

This is a fact...belief isn't necessary unless.you don't believe facts.
And more importantly...the microchips in it prevents you from getting the gay virus. Well worth the shot
 
Back
Top