Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/ne...p&cvid=dba13ecd7d16402d835f8bd296cc63a7&ei=41“Plaintiff’s motion to amend is DENIED without prejudice because it does not comply with Local Rule 7.1(C), which requires a certificate confirming compliance with Rule 7.1(B)’s attorney-conference requirement,” U.S. District Judge Allen Winsor wrote. “Plaintiff may refile the motion after conferring with Defendants and otherwise complying with the Local Rules.”
“Disney is invited to work with the defendants to try to amend the complaint.”Disney's attempt to streamline its case against desantis denied without prejudice over a formality:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/ne...p&cvid=dba13ecd7d16402d835f8bd296cc63a7&ei=41
Disney's attempt to streamline its case against desantis denied without prejudice over a formality:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/ne...p&cvid=dba13ecd7d16402d835f8bd296cc63a7&ei=41
“Disney is invited to work with the defendants to try to amend the complaint.”![]()
So the legal battle continues but it does seem as if lawyers for the state board have dragged the battle into their preferred forum. Getting to the obvious question, is this a win for Disney or a loss? Dan McLaughlin says its a loss:
2. The fact that Disney dropped all its claims against executive actions means that its sole remaining claim runs up against formidable 11th Circuit precedent, Ala. Educ. Ass'n v. Bentley (In re Hubbard), 803 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir 2015).
— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) September 7, 2023
3. Under Hubbard, "when a statute is facially
constitutional, a plaintiff cannot bring a free-speech
challenge by claiming that the lawmakers
who passed it acted with a constitutionally
impermissible purpose."
— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) September 7, 2023
5. Put simply, Disney got outlawyered here by DeSantis's team. The people who told you it had a slam-dunk federal case have some egg on their faces right now.
— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) September 7, 2023
Damn.... you'd think a Lawyer would be better versed in the English language.Dam those legal formalities.
You'd think that Disney could hire lawyers who know the law...
Maybe if Disney woulda hired Tranny Lawyers they coulda had success
Dude ... the 'w' thing ... not a word.
Hahaha!!!
"DeSantis' board has now revealed that, while they were snoozing, Disney executed an agreement with their predecessors that strips the new board of all its powers except the authority to "maintain the roads and maintain basic infrastructure,” according to one of the new board members.
Hilariously, the agreement Disney reached will remain in effect at least until 21 years "after the death of the last survivor of the descendants of King Charles III, King of England," currently living."
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/column-disneys-lawyers-brutally-manhandled-150434800.html
lol that doesn't mean what you think. But then again, thinking's not exactly your forte.Huge Win for DeSantis and Florida As Disney Announces Massive New Investments
https://pjmedia.com/columns/chris-q...ey-announces-massive-new-investments-n1728389
ZipShit, miserable failure
Huge Win for DeSantis and Florida As Disney Announces Massive New Investments
https://pjmedia.com/columns/chris-q...ey-announces-massive-new-investments-n1728389
ZipShit, miserable failure
No surprise that you don’t like people having the freedom of speech.Yup, their entire narrative is imploding before their eyes.
First it was "checkmate" until Disney dropped some of it's claims. Then it was "take their money elsewhere" which has now returned a slap in the face by Disney announcing new investments in Florida.
At some point the dipshits like zippitydodo will have to concede that they backed the wrong side.
Disney never said they were not investing in Florida. What they did was pull a bunch of investments they were going to move forward on this year. Those were pulled.Yup, their entire narrative is imploding before their eyes.
First it was "checkmate" until Disney dropped some of it's claims. Then it was "take their money elsewhere" which has now returned a slap in the face by Disney announcing new investments in Florida.
At some point the dipshits like zippitydodo will have to concede that they backed the wrong side.
Until they tell Ron they don’t like something he said, and then we gotta string up Harry Potter and Shrek!So giving a company a special district ....interesting.