HOW TO TELL...if you're a bi-curious man!

I knew I was Bi curious when.....

I knew I was Bi curious when I started looking at my friends and other men, and wondering what their hard cocks would look like. I wanted to know how I could find out how big they were, whether they were curved or straight, and what it would take to find out. I wondered what it would be like to suck them off, or have them fuck me. Could I seduce or tempt them, or wold they freak out if they knew what I was thinking?
 
hmmmm

I seem to always be attracted to women but, my sexual desire for men comes and it is intense and high then it goes away. I woke up a couple of hours ago thinking of a friend of mine. I am laying there with my hand laying on my stomach and cock at full attention with thoughts of him fucking me. An image of a hot, tongue infested kiss between us pops in my my head while his cock is moving in and out of me. At that moment, a large amount of pre-cum lands on my hand. I touch the head of my cock and I am just oozing. So here I am super horny. I'll read literotica, watch porn and have a huge orgasm and then my desire for men will disappear for a few weeks. I used to question this and wonder why but now I just have a lot of fun with it. My orgasms when I am in these moods are so huge and so awesome.

I have never acted on the fantasies I have about him but on mornings like today, I would love too.

I'm right there w/ both of u, I write about my fantasies when I get like this. I even have a waterproof toy for just such special times that sends me right over the edge. My favorite M/M/F fantasy involves a dominant woman and 1 or more men with her instructing me on what to do to them, usually sucking them both, or having one guy fuck my ass while I suck off the other while the woman watches and pleasures herself. U guys sound like a fun couple of potential candidates ;)
 
In the world of fantasies? I'd be right there behind you (or in front, depending on whether your ass or mouth's already doing something else!). But given the chance? I'd probably pass. Oh, and I used to write my fantasies down as well, though gay erotica was in the minority.

And yes, handsfree6969, the fantasies and orgasms can be intense. Is that evidence of repression, and latent homosexuality? Or does it simply represent that we still perceive these desires as taboo, so there's an extra thrill? That this is something we 'shouldn't' get hard over?
I'm not sure there's an obvious or easy answer, and like you, I just enjoy the fantasies whenever I wish to.

My love for women is real and has been proven - whereas even a very close friendship with a gay guy never even began to develop into anything sexual (though I fantasised about him), and he knew about my bi-curious leanings. I felt no great disappointment at not getting closer, even when we used to drink a lot together - I probably just went home and had a quick wank. Whereas relationships with women have been heartbreaking (as well as indescribably joyful, obviously).
 
cock

When i was younger i used to wank an older boy off several times a week, we would play willy willy. he had a massive cock.Years later i had an adult mate and we had many sessions i loved the feel of his dick i wanked him off in all the rooms in his house.:kiss:
 
Copies from a Bi Buddies Blog... Mark W.

Frot & Frottage
from JackScottsBisexualBuddies by Jack Scott

The quintessential straight person who has never considered any type of sex as normal other than missionary position sex between a man and his wife often makes a big mistake by thinking that what they think of as abnormal sexual behavior can be labeled and separated into neat categories such as homosexuality and bisexuality.


Of course there is a bright side to being labeled homosexual or bisexual. Labels can be even more biting. Some less charitable straight people just label everyone else as perverts and let it go at that.

Having always from my earliest memories been an actively sexual person, I've paid a lot of attention to sex over the course of my life. I've studied it, read about it, observed it and participated in it on many different levels. I've found sexual behavior is almost as varied and multifarious as humanity itself.

I had the greatest of childhoods. It was filled with sexual camaraderie. Almost all the boys I grew up with were eager and willing participants in daily group sexual activities. It was so pervasive a part of life, I thought it to be the type of life every boy lived. I was surprised when, as an adult, I eventually developed sexual relationships with other adult men who told me they were, for the most part, unaware anything sexual in nature until they were 12 years old or even older. It was something I could not imagine.

Yet even in the charged sexual environment in which I came of age, there were differences among us. Looking back, the differences are more obvious to me now than they were at the time. The reality is, I didn't spend much time thinking about it all as a boy. I just enjoyed it.

I was an eager and willing participant. In fact, after my initiation into the group, in all honesty, I have to admit, I became an instigator. I simply couldn't get enough. I was always ready for more. Other boys were willing to play, but they would have been willing not to play too. It was a social thing for them. They did it because that is what the group did. I did it because I absolutely was in to it.


Within the group, most activity centered around simple masturbation. Generally, this was mutual masturbation where buddies would jerk each others cock either to orgasm or orgasm and emission. When I first became a part of the group at around age 6, emission was, of course, not possible for me; but orgasm was. It was those orgasms which compelled me. I've never used illegal drugs; but I suppose, I came to seek out the highs of orgasm just as a junky comes to seek his drug high.

Fellatio was not a group activity. It was always an activity which was engaged in privately and one on one. The same was true for anal sex. Anal sex was hardly ever even spoken of in the group except derisively; and it was always engaged in privately one on one. I was more than eager for oral activity. I loved sucking cock and having mine sucked; and all through my school years, I had one or more suck buddies. However, anal sex did not interest me. It seemed like a dirty thing to do to me, and it wasn't like I wasn't having enough fun sexually without it. However, that said, one of my friends eventually talked me into topping him. I was big enough that he quickly decided the idea of being fucked was better than the reality of being fucked, and that was the only time I ever experienced anal activity as a kid. Later, in my first adult relationship, my buddy loved to be fucked and he got off on my big cock and liked it has rough and hard as I could make it. I found being a top was a very enjoyable experience with him; though with subsequent buddies, such activity again reverted back to not being a normal thing.

In my profession, travel was the norm. My travel was a little different from normal business travel in that there was a team of guys traveling together. We were all about the same age and had things in common other than our career. The constant traveling together brings guys close and we got to know each other very well. The relationship never took a sexual turn, but there was very little we didn't talk about. I, and I suspect one other guy, was a closeted bisexual guy. All of us were or had been married. A few of us had had an extramarital affair with another woman. A couple of the guys made extramarital affairs and one night stands into an art form. For them it was a way of life. Most of the guys, however, were faithful to their wives and would never have thought of infidelity.

The point to all of this is that from my own experience and observation, human sexuality is dynamic. It almost defies the label of normality because human beings simply engage in an astounding variety of sexual activities.

My general philosophy has evolved to the point that I believe anything which does not harm oneself or another is within the realm of normal.

As a bisexual man, I have enjoyed a range of sexual behavior with my wife and with my buddies through the years. I've come to see that the range of activities vary for me depending on my partner. Different partners are good at different things and some can bring such talent and physical characteristics to the partnership that different things take on a whole new sense of enjoyment.


A few years ago I was introduced to a philosophy I had not previously known of. It is actually an ancient philosophy that began to be revived in the last decade of the 20th century. It is called Frottage (rhymes with massage) or Frot (rhymes with hot). Frot is the contemporary philosophy of a man named Bill Weintraub. Weintraub coined the word "Frot" to describe penis to penis non penetrative play between two adult men. This type of play is based on Frottage which was a part of many ancient warrior societies in which male bonding and male mentorship were encouraged. The word "Frottage" comes from the French word meaning "to rub." In French Frottage can have non sexual connotations, but in English the primary connotation is a sexual one.

Bill Weintraub and Luke Shelton have formed what they refer to as the Man2Man Alliance. The Man2Man Alliance considers Frot to be a manifestation of basic male biology. All males, they believe, are not only physically capable of giving and receiving sexual pleasure to each other through body to body and penis to penis contact; but also as males, they are hard wired to enjoy it.

At least in the Man2Man Alliance's form of Frottage, promiscuity is discouraged. While men are encouraged to be a part of a three person sexual group consisting of a man, his wife and his buddy, the alliance does not feel that bonded friendships between two men have to lead to sexual activity. They just recognize that quite often they do; and when the do, these sexual activities are not seen as aberrant in any way. In fact within the context of Frottage as male to male, penis to penis non penetrative sexual enjoyment, even the Biblical prohibition of a man not lying with another man as he lies with a woman is seen as not applicable to the situation. Frot men are not lying with a man as he does with a woman. There is no penetration with a woman, and women are incapable of penis to penis sexual enjoyment. Further, the Bible makes it crystal clear that Kind David loved Jonathan. In Frot philosophy, David and Jonathan were early examples of the biological norm for Frot practicing men.

Weintraub, a self identified gay man has never personally been into anal sex. In fact, he believes mutual jacking off, Frottage, oral sex anal sex between gay men were relatively equal pursuits among gay men until the last quarter of the 20th century when the gay culture was highjacked by radical right wing gays whose agenda it was to make anal sex synonymous with being gay. In his view, this right wing conspiracy has been a big success. Mutual jacking off, Frottage and oral sex have become simply types of foreplay that are subordinate to and lead up to the now essential act of anal intercourse.

There is actually much that appeals to me in the Frot & Frottage philosophies. Like them, I believe male/male sexual relationships are an essentially male acknowledgement of all things masculine. I believe such male to male sexual bonding is part of the biological definition of what it means to be a male; and I believe, the ability to build civilization itself was wrapped within the ability of men not only to fight each other as warriors, but to bond together as brother warriors and enjoy male/male sexuality.

Weintraub and his followers loose me philosophically simply because they are a little too militant for my taste. I'm not good at seeing conspiracies and I have trouble thinking that a right wing conspiracy of radical gay men would be able to completely change gay behavior and redefine the essence of homosexuality. I think instead the homosexual stereotype of guy fucking guy has become the face of homosexuality in the modern era due to mass communication and increased openness about all things gay.

My own view of anal sex is that no one who doesn't appreciate it will be forced to appreciate anal sex by the dictates of gay culture. I personally know of many gay men whose lives do not involve anal sex and they feel no pressure whatsoever to make it a part of their sexual play.

I think one has to be careful not to become so consumed by his own personal philosophy and by his own personal situation and circumstance that he tries to force it upon everyone else. I especially have a problem if one takes a militant course of action to force his reasonings on someone else. I plead guilty immediately to having strong personal opinions, but I am quick to recognize my personal opinions can be nothing more than considerations for others in dealing with their own sexuality.

In the straight side of my life, I watched a couple of my professional colleagues fuck every woman they could get to. What I observed was that all the conquests didn't really make them happy. There was no bond, there was no love. There was only, in the end, the search for something they couldn't find. They were, as the country and western song, popular at the time said, "Looking for Love in All The Wrong Places." They never found it.

I know a number of promiscuous bisexual and homosexual guys. They cruise from guy to guy in a constant churning of bodies. They never find what they are looking for. They never stop the search because they don't realize what they are wanting, what they are needing, is to satisfy the biological need to bond with one other guy in a significant way.

One of the new trends in foods these days is fusion. As I understand it, fusion cooking takes a little from one culture and combines it with something radically different from another culture to come up with new and exciting things for our culinary enjoyment. I have come to believe the wise person does the same thing with life. He pulls what he likes from many different influences in his life and melds them into a mixture all his own and finds a buddy to share it all with.

I think the ideas behind Frot & Frottage are well worth getting acquainted with as homosexual and bisexual men. While I don't agree with Weintraub's militancy in trying to promote Frot as the only true expression of male/male sexuality, it could be that, in fact he is right. Frot & Frottage are concepts that predate the concepts of homosexuality and bisexuality by thousands of years and the terms could cover all that is a part of the biological celebration of masculinity, of male/male sex and bonding.

Jack Scott
 
Here's a random, possibly stupid question: In terms of sexual orientation, where would I fit in as a mostly hetero guy who's also really attracted to fem boys, transvestites, and crossdressers, as well as male bodies/equipment but not "manly" male faces at all? Keep in mind I'm not one of those guys who's scared of self-identifying as bi - I have no issue with calling myself bi or pansexual. I just don't know how bi it would make me on say, the Kinsey scale or something like that.
 
Copies from a Bi Buddies Blog... Mark W.

Frot & Frottage
from JackScottsBisexualBuddies by Jack Scott

The quintessential straight person who has never considered any type of sex as normal other than missionary position sex between a man and his wife often makes a big mistake by thinking that what they think of as abnormal sexual behavior can be labeled and separated into neat categories such as homosexuality and bisexuality.


Of course there is a bright side to being labeled homosexual or bisexual. Labels can be even more biting. Some less charitable straight people just label everyone else as perverts and let it go at that.

Having always from my earliest memories been an actively sexual person, I've paid a lot of attention to sex over the course of my life. I've studied it, read about it, observed it and participated in it on many different levels. I've found sexual behavior is almost as varied and multifarious as humanity itself.

I had the greatest of childhoods. It was filled with sexual camaraderie. Almost all the boys I grew up with were eager and willing participants in daily group sexual activities. It was so pervasive a part of life, I thought it to be the type of life every boy lived. I was surprised when, as an adult, I eventually developed sexual relationships with other adult men who told me they were, for the most part, unaware anything sexual in nature until they were 12 years old or even older. It was something I could not imagine.

Yet even in the charged sexual environment in which I came of age, there were differences among us. Looking back, the differences are more obvious to me now than they were at the time. The reality is, I didn't spend much time thinking about it all as a boy. I just enjoyed it.

I was an eager and willing participant. In fact, after my initiation into the group, in all honesty, I have to admit, I became an instigator. I simply couldn't get enough. I was always ready for more. Other boys were willing to play, but they would have been willing not to play too. It was a social thing for them. They did it because that is what the group did. I did it because I absolutely was in to it.


Within the group, most activity centered around simple masturbation. Generally, this was mutual masturbation where buddies would jerk each others cock either to orgasm or orgasm and emission. When I first became a part of the group at around age 6, emission was, of course, not possible for me; but orgasm was. It was those orgasms which compelled me. I've never used illegal drugs; but I suppose, I came to seek out the highs of orgasm just as a junky comes to seek his drug high.

Fellatio was not a group activity. It was always an activity which was engaged in privately and one on one. The same was true for anal sex. Anal sex was hardly ever even spoken of in the group except derisively; and it was always engaged in privately one on one. I was more than eager for oral activity. I loved sucking cock and having mine sucked; and all through my school years, I had one or more suck buddies. However, anal sex did not interest me. It seemed like a dirty thing to do to me, and it wasn't like I wasn't having enough fun sexually without it. However, that said, one of my friends eventually talked me into topping him. I was big enough that he quickly decided the idea of being fucked was better than the reality of being fucked, and that was the only time I ever experienced anal activity as a kid. Later, in my first adult relationship, my buddy loved to be fucked and he got off on my big cock and liked it has rough and hard as I could make it. I found being a top was a very enjoyable experience with him; though with subsequent buddies, such activity again reverted back to not being a normal thing.

In my profession, travel was the norm. My travel was a little different from normal business travel in that there was a team of guys traveling together. We were all about the same age and had things in common other than our career. The constant traveling together brings guys close and we got to know each other very well. The relationship never took a sexual turn, but there was very little we didn't talk about. I, and I suspect one other guy, was a closeted bisexual guy. All of us were or had been married. A few of us had had an extramarital affair with another woman. A couple of the guys made extramarital affairs and one night stands into an art form. For them it was a way of life. Most of the guys, however, were faithful to their wives and would never have thought of infidelity.

The point to all of this is that from my own experience and observation, human sexuality is dynamic. It almost defies the label of normality because human beings simply engage in an astounding variety of sexual activities.

My general philosophy has evolved to the point that I believe anything which does not harm oneself or another is within the realm of normal.

As a bisexual man, I have enjoyed a range of sexual behavior with my wife and with my buddies through the years. I've come to see that the range of activities vary for me depending on my partner. Different partners are good at different things and some can bring such talent and physical characteristics to the partnership that different things take on a whole new sense of enjoyment.


A few years ago I was introduced to a philosophy I had not previously known of. It is actually an ancient philosophy that began to be revived in the last decade of the 20th century. It is called Frottage (rhymes with massage) or Frot (rhymes with hot). Frot is the contemporary philosophy of a man named Bill Weintraub. Weintraub coined the word "Frot" to describe penis to penis non penetrative play between two adult men. This type of play is based on Frottage which was a part of many ancient warrior societies in which male bonding and male mentorship were encouraged. The word "Frottage" comes from the French word meaning "to rub." In French Frottage can have non sexual connotations, but in English the primary connotation is a sexual one.

Bill Weintraub and Luke Shelton have formed what they refer to as the Man2Man Alliance. The Man2Man Alliance considers Frot to be a manifestation of basic male biology. All males, they believe, are not only physically capable of giving and receiving sexual pleasure to each other through body to body and penis to penis contact; but also as males, they are hard wired to enjoy it.

At least in the Man2Man Alliance's form of Frottage, promiscuity is discouraged. While men are encouraged to be a part of a three person sexual group consisting of a man, his wife and his buddy, the alliance does not feel that bonded friendships between two men have to lead to sexual activity. They just recognize that quite often they do; and when the do, these sexual activities are not seen as aberrant in any way. In fact within the context of Frottage as male to male, penis to penis non penetrative sexual enjoyment, even the Biblical prohibition of a man not lying with another man as he lies with a woman is seen as not applicable to the situation. Frot men are not lying with a man as he does with a woman. There is no penetration with a woman, and women are incapable of penis to penis sexual enjoyment. Further, the Bible makes it crystal clear that Kind David loved Jonathan. In Frot philosophy, David and Jonathan were early examples of the biological norm for Frot practicing men.

Weintraub, a self identified gay man has never personally been into anal sex. In fact, he believes mutual jacking off, Frottage, oral sex anal sex between gay men were relatively equal pursuits among gay men until the last quarter of the 20th century when the gay culture was highjacked by radical right wing gays whose agenda it was to make anal sex synonymous with being gay. In his view, this right wing conspiracy has been a big success. Mutual jacking off, Frottage and oral sex have become simply types of foreplay that are subordinate to and lead up to the now essential act of anal intercourse.

There is actually much that appeals to me in the Frot & Frottage philosophies. Like them, I believe male/male sexual relationships are an essentially male acknowledgement of all things masculine. I believe such male to male sexual bonding is part of the biological definition of what it means to be a male; and I believe, the ability to build civilization itself was wrapped within the ability of men not only to fight each other as warriors, but to bond together as brother warriors and enjoy male/male sexuality.

Weintraub and his followers loose me philosophically simply because they are a little too militant for my taste. I'm not good at seeing conspiracies and I have trouble thinking that a right wing conspiracy of radical gay men would be able to completely change gay behavior and redefine the essence of homosexuality. I think instead the homosexual stereotype of guy fucking guy has become the face of homosexuality in the modern era due to mass communication and increased openness about all things gay.

My own view of anal sex is that no one who doesn't appreciate it will be forced to appreciate anal sex by the dictates of gay culture. I personally know of many gay men whose lives do not involve anal sex and they feel no pressure whatsoever to make it a part of their sexual play.

I think one has to be careful not to become so consumed by his own personal philosophy and by his own personal situation and circumstance that he tries to force it upon everyone else. I especially have a problem if one takes a militant course of action to force his reasonings on someone else. I plead guilty immediately to having strong personal opinions, but I am quick to recognize my personal opinions can be nothing more than considerations for others in dealing with their own sexuality.

In the straight side of my life, I watched a couple of my professional colleagues fuck every woman they could get to. What I observed was that all the conquests didn't really make them happy. There was no bond, there was no love. There was only, in the end, the search for something they couldn't find. They were, as the country and western song, popular at the time said, "Looking for Love in All The Wrong Places." They never found it.

I know a number of promiscuous bisexual and homosexual guys. They cruise from guy to guy in a constant churning of bodies. They never find what they are looking for. They never stop the search because they don't realize what they are wanting, what they are needing, is to satisfy the biological need to bond with one other guy in a significant way.

One of the new trends in foods these days is fusion. As I understand it, fusion cooking takes a little from one culture and combines it with something radically different from another culture to come up with new and exciting things for our culinary enjoyment. I have come to believe the wise person does the same thing with life. He pulls what he likes from many different influences in his life and melds them into a mixture all his own and finds a buddy to share it all with.

I think the ideas behind Frot & Frottage are well worth getting acquainted with as homosexual and bisexual men. While I don't agree with Weintraub's militancy in trying to promote Frot as the only true expression of male/male sexuality, it could be that, in fact he is right. Frot & Frottage are concepts that predate the concepts of homosexuality and bisexuality by thousands of years and the terms could cover all that is a part of the biological celebration of masculinity, of male/male sex and bonding.

Jack Scott


This post makes me happy!
 
Copies from a Bi Buddies Blog... Mark W.

At least in the Man2Man Alliance's form of Frottage, promiscuity is discouraged. While men are encouraged to be a part of a three person sexual group consisting of a man, his wife and his buddy, the alliance does not feel that bonded friendships between two men have to lead to sexual activity. They just recognize that quite often they do; and when the do, these sexual activities are not seen as aberrant in any way. In fact within the context of Frottage as male to male, penis to penis non penetrative sexual enjoyment, even the Biblical prohibition of a man not lying with another man as he lies with a woman is seen as not applicable to the situation. Frot men are not lying with a man as he does with a woman. There is no penetration with a woman, and women are incapable of penis to penis sexual enjoyment. Further, the Bible makes it crystal clear that Kind David loved Jonathan. In Frot philosophy, David and Jonathan were early examples of the biological norm for Frot practicing men.
Sounds like a bunch of seudo intelectual nonesense to me. Rubbing cocks together is a philosopy? Than I'm fucking Aristotle

In the straight side of my life, I watched a couple of my professional colleagues fuck every woman they could get to. What I observed was that all the conquests didn't really make them happy. There was no bond, there was no love. There was only, in the end, the search for something they couldn't find. They were, as the country and western song, popular at the time said, "Looking for Love in All The Wrong Places." They never found it.

I know a number of promiscuous bisexual and homosexual guys. They cruise from guy to guy in a constant churning of bodies. They never find what they are looking for. They never stop the search because they don't realize what they are wanting, what they are needing, is to satisfy the biological need to bond with one other guy in a significant way.

Jack Scott

Maybe they want to fuck every day of their lives. My friends that fish and hunt are always on some damn trip somewhere...let’s not over analyze it. I don't think finding a buddy to rub your penises with are going to fulfill anyone’s needs.

"Hey don't worry. this is not gay we are just Frting. Come on everyones doin it. Hell the Spartens did it"

This just sounds ridiculous


BTW - You may enjoy the cock-on-cock thread. Plenty of frottaging goin on
 
Sounds like a bunch of seudo intelectual nonesense to me. Rubbing cocks together is a philosopy? Than I'm fucking Aristotle



Maybe they want to fuck every day of their lives. My friends that fish and hunt are always on some damn trip somewhere...let’s not over analyze it. I don't think finding a buddy to rub your penises with are going to fulfill anyone’s needs.

"Hey don't worry. this is not gay we are just Frting. Come on everyones doin it. Hell the Spartens did it"

This just sounds ridiculous


BTW - You may enjoy the cock-on-cock thread. Plenty of frottaging goin on


Strait guy + any Greek innuendo= my ass kicked

I'm glad someone finally explained this to me...

THIS IS SPARTA!!!
 
"Hey don't worry. this is not gay we are just Frting. Come on everyones doin it. Hell the Spartens did it"

This just sounds ridiculous

Well, yeah: anything would sound ridiculous if you mispell it like that! :D
 
Well, yeah: anything would sound ridiculous if you mispell it like that! :D

Plus, for whatever reason in random hook-ups, you'd be amazed what you can get away with if you say, "This isn't gay it's _______________".

My boyfriend thought sex with me wasn't gay- as in, anal sex-his cock inside me and all that, because- fuck knows why. But yeah, it can work.
 
aha now that's gay. Picking on peoples spelling. Go frottage yourself...our whatever it is called.

Ohhhhhhhhh ... wellllllll ... now I'm embarrassed. :eek: I thought when he mispelled in the sentence ...

... "Hey don't worry. this is not gay we are just Frting. ..."

... he had just left out an "a" ...

... which I did think was kind of gay!

...

...

:D
 
I think you can tell if you're bi-curious

1. when you start thinking about your lifetime of sexual adventures and realize that you've been fucked by twenty-five men and only seven women.

2. when you look at the M-M couples in the personal section of the classified ads because you love cock in your boi-pussy and mouth at the same time.

3. when your nipples get hard and sensitive just from thinking about cock, hard, delicious wonderful cock.

I think if this describes you, you've skated way past curious. The bi/bicurious label is a tough one. My relationships and orientation seems to be all about women, but I am very turned on by cock, sucking it, sharing it, you get the idea. So if I suck someone's cock, I say I'm bisexual even though it's a homosexual act. That's fine with me. I figure if I'm with people who are wired the same way, there's no need for labels, let's just do what we like to do!
 
You Guys are Funny as Hell! Stop Being Defined!

Before the Internet (and sites like this one) ruined the market for stroke fiction magazines (remember those?), I used to write and sell to a montly magazine called "Options - the BI-Monthly." Each month, they would feature seven or eight stories of guys getting it on and one lesbian story a month. I always thought the writer's guidelines were a joke. Submissions were to have sex between two men only. While I successfully sold to them lots of times, the only stories that were rejected included a woman in the man-on-man fun. I didn't get it. The only thing bi about the stories was mentioning a character's wife or girlfriend in passing.

Meanwhile, guys know what's gay. We've been taught it our entire lives. Being gay is "bad" and your buddies were more than happy to point out "Dude, that's really gay!" It didn't matter what it was: a shirt that was the wrong color, walking your family's fluffy little dog, owning a cat instead of a dog. Hell, even if we were to admit to our buddies, "I like it when my girlfriend sticks her finger in my ass," we're accused of being "gay."

Interesting side note I'd love to have verified: I once heard, in Hispanic cultures, only the male on the receiving end is concerned gay. So, if you were fucking some guy up the ass, that wasn't gay, but the guy getting it up the ass was. Supposedly, the same is true on the pitching versus catching side of things.

My first sexual experiences with someone other than myself happened at the hand and mouth of a neighborhood friend. He and I swapped hand-jobs and blow-jobs all summer long the summer before women would start to notice me. (Literotica rules prevent me from saying how old I was.) The next year, women finally began paying attention to my advances, and my life was set.

Except I never forgot how Brian's cock felt inside my mouth.

It didn't help matters that Brian turned out to be completely gay. The first boy to be out and public in our high school. I stopped being friends with him. After all, I wasn't gay. I knew I wasn't. I liked pussy too much to be gay. And who knew what being bisexual meant? I'm not even sure we had that word 30+ years ago.

Here's the rules every guy grows up with:
*If you check out another guy's junk, you're gay
*If something touches your asshole, man/woman/otherwise - you're gay.

Doesn't matter how much pussy you eat or fuck, you're gay. You're a fucking faggot. And don't even try to hide it, LMAO!

Ask any phone sex operator what the most common fantasy is (which I have) and it's all so often "some guy being forced to suck cock."

I had a gay roommate in the army. This was back during the Reagan presidency, so long before "don't ask, don't tell." I came out to him that I was more than just "straight." It confused the hell out of him. How could I like being with a guy and still want to be with a woman?

Years later, I came out to my wife. On the Kinsley scale, she's as straight as they come. While accepting of my difference, it makes NO sense to her. How can I be such a lover of woman and still enjoy the feel of a hard cock between my lips?

Here's the really funny part of this to me: women feel the same damn way! A friend of mine and his wife belong to a couple swinger clubs. His wife will let another woman go down on her, but she'll never do it in return. Does that make her less of a lesbian? I'm sorry, but this just makes me think of the tests they used to apply to decide if someone was black or not. Hell, they still use tests like that to decide if your Native American or not. One-half Cherokee? Yeah, you're Native American. One-fourth Cherokee? Oh, now it gets to be questionable. One-eight Cherokee? I don't know if you qualify any more.

I've kissed another man and didn't like it. I don't want to do that. I've had toys and the fingers of women up my butt, but never another man there. I've sucked several cocks off to completion in my life (and hope to do it again). I've met men one-on-one and have shared a man with my wife. Let me ask you this: is it gay for my balls to bump up against another man's balls? What if it happens while we're double penetrating my wife?

Sorry for the overly long post, but geez... after reading all these posts, here's the deal. If you like it up the butt, that doesn't make you gay or bi or even bi-curious. It means, um, THAT YOU LIKE IT UP THE ASS! End of story. Go buy your wife a new strap-on and stop worrying about yourself.

Final thought: why the hell doesn't Literotica have "bisexual" or "male bisexual" listed as a story category?!
 
Before the Internet (and sites like this one) ruined the market for stroke fiction magazines (remember those?), I used to write and sell to a montly magazine called "Options - the BI-Monthly." Each month, they would feature seven or eight stories of guys getting it on and one lesbian story a month. I always thought the writer's guidelines were a joke. Submissions were to have sex between two men only. While I successfully sold to them lots of times, the only stories that were rejected included a woman in the man-on-man fun. I didn't get it. The only thing bi about the stories was mentioning a character's wife or girlfriend in passing.

Meanwhile, guys know what's gay. We've been taught it our entire lives. Being gay is "bad" and your buddies were more than happy to point out "Dude, that's really gay!" It didn't matter what it was: a shirt that was the wrong color, walking your family's fluffy little dog, owning a cat instead of a dog. Hell, even if we were to admit to our buddies, "I like it when my girlfriend sticks her finger in my ass," we're accused of being "gay."

Interesting side note I'd love to have verified: I once heard, in Hispanic cultures, only the male on the receiving end is concerned gay. So, if you were fucking some guy up the ass, that wasn't gay, but the guy getting it up the ass was. Supposedly, the same is true on the pitching versus catching side of things.

My first sexual experiences with someone other than myself happened at the hand and mouth of a neighborhood friend. He and I swapped hand-jobs and blow-jobs all summer long the summer before women would start to notice me. (Literotica rules prevent me from saying how old I was.) The next year, women finally began paying attention to my advances, and my life was set.

Except I never forgot how Brian's cock felt inside my mouth.

It didn't help matters that Brian turned out to be completely gay. The first boy to be out and public in our high school. I stopped being friends with him. After all, I wasn't gay. I knew I wasn't. I liked pussy too much to be gay. And who knew what being bisexual meant? I'm not even sure we had that word 30+ years ago.

Here's the rules every guy grows up with:
*If you check out another guy's junk, you're gay
*If something touches your asshole, man/woman/otherwise - you're gay.

Doesn't matter how much pussy you eat or fuck, you're gay. You're a fucking faggot. And don't even try to hide it, LMAO!

Ask any phone sex operator what the most common fantasy is (which I have) and it's all so often "some guy being forced to suck cock."

I had a gay roommate in the army. This was back during the Reagan presidency, so long before "don't ask, don't tell." I came out to him that I was more than just "straight." It confused the hell out of him. How could I like being with a guy and still want to be with a woman?

Years later, I came out to my wife. On the Kinsley scale, she's as straight as they come. While accepting of my difference, it makes NO sense to her. How can I be such a lover of woman and still enjoy the feel of a hard cock between my lips?

Here's the really funny part of this to me: women feel the same damn way! A friend of mine and his wife belong to a couple swinger clubs. His wife will let another woman go down on her, but she'll never do it in return. Does that make her less of a lesbian? I'm sorry, but this just makes me think of the tests they used to apply to decide if someone was black or not. Hell, they still use tests like that to decide if your Native American or not. One-half Cherokee? Yeah, you're Native American. One-fourth Cherokee? Oh, now it gets to be questionable. One-eight Cherokee? I don't know if you qualify any more.

I've kissed another man and didn't like it. I don't want to do that. I've had toys and the fingers of women up my butt, but never another man there. I've sucked several cocks off to completion in my life (and hope to do it again). I've met men one-on-one and have shared a man with my wife. Let me ask you this: is it gay for my balls to bump up against another man's balls? What if it happens while we're double penetrating my wife?

Sorry for the overly long post, but geez... after reading all these posts, here's the deal. If you like it up the butt, that doesn't make you gay or bi or even bi-curious. It means, um, THAT YOU LIKE IT UP THE ASS! End of story. Go buy your wife a new strap-on and stop worrying about yourself.

Final thought: why the hell doesn't Literotica have "bisexual" or "male bisexual" listed as a story category?!

I like you.
 
Sorry for the overly long post, but geez... after reading all these posts, here's the deal. If you like it up the butt, that doesn't make you gay or bi or even bi-curious. It means, um, THAT YOU LIKE IT UP THE ASS! End of story. Go buy your wife a new strap-on and stop worrying about yourself.
?!

Great post. Reminds me of an old saying....You suck one cock and your a cock sucker. If you drive one truck our not a truck driver? WTF.

If it feels good do it. Life is too damn short.
 
Before the Internet (and sites like this one) ruined the market for stroke fiction magazines (remember those?), I used to write and sell to a montly magazine called "Options - the BI-Monthly." Each month, they would feature seven or eight stories of guys getting it on and one lesbian story a month. I always thought the writer's guidelines were a joke. Submissions were to have sex between two men only. While I successfully sold to them lots of times, the only stories that were rejected included a woman in the man-on-man fun. I didn't get it. The only thing bi about the stories was mentioning a character's wife or girlfriend in passing.

Meanwhile, guys know what's gay. We've been taught it our entire lives. Being gay is "bad" and your buddies were more than happy to point out "Dude, that's really gay!" It didn't matter what it was: a shirt that was the wrong color, walking your family's fluffy little dog, owning a cat instead of a dog. Hell, even if we were to admit to our buddies, "I like it when my girlfriend sticks her finger in my ass," we're accused of being "gay."

Interesting side note I'd love to have verified: I once heard, in Hispanic cultures, only the male on the receiving end is concerned gay. So, if you were fucking some guy up the ass, that wasn't gay, but the guy getting it up the ass was. Supposedly, the same is true on the pitching versus catching side of things.

My first sexual experiences with someone other than myself happened at the hand and mouth of a neighborhood friend. He and I swapped hand-jobs and blow-jobs all summer long the summer before women would start to notice me. (Literotica rules prevent me from saying how old I was.) The next year, women finally began paying attention to my advances, and my life was set.

Except I never forgot how Brian's cock felt inside my mouth.

It didn't help matters that Brian turned out to be completely gay. The first boy to be out and public in our high school. I stopped being friends with him. After all, I wasn't gay. I knew I wasn't. I liked pussy too much to be gay. And who knew what being bisexual meant? I'm not even sure we had that word 30+ years ago.

Here's the rules every guy grows up with:
*If you check out another guy's junk, you're gay
*If something touches your asshole, man/woman/otherwise - you're gay.

Doesn't matter how much pussy you eat or fuck, you're gay. You're a fucking faggot. And don't even try to hide it, LMAO!

Ask any phone sex operator what the most common fantasy is (which I have) and it's all so often "some guy being forced to suck cock."

I had a gay roommate in the army. This was back during the Reagan presidency, so long before "don't ask, don't tell." I came out to him that I was more than just "straight." It confused the hell out of him. How could I like being with a guy and still want to be with a woman?

Years later, I came out to my wife. On the Kinsley scale, she's as straight as they come. While accepting of my difference, it makes NO sense to her. How can I be such a lover of woman and still enjoy the feel of a hard cock between my lips?

Here's the really funny part of this to me: women feel the same damn way! A friend of mine and his wife belong to a couple swinger clubs. His wife will let another woman go down on her, but she'll never do it in return. Does that make her less of a lesbian? I'm sorry, but this just makes me think of the tests they used to apply to decide if someone was black or not. Hell, they still use tests like that to decide if your Native American or not. One-half Cherokee? Yeah, you're Native American. One-fourth Cherokee? Oh, now it gets to be questionable. One-eight Cherokee? I don't know if you qualify any more.

I've kissed another man and didn't like it. I don't want to do that. I've had toys and the fingers of women up my butt, but never another man there. I've sucked several cocks off to completion in my life (and hope to do it again). I've met men one-on-one and have shared a man with my wife. Let me ask you this: is it gay for my balls to bump up against another man's balls? What if it happens while we're double penetrating my wife?

Sorry for the overly long post, but geez... after reading all these posts, here's the deal. If you like it up the butt, that doesn't make you gay or bi or even bi-curious. It means, um, THAT YOU LIKE IT UP THE ASS! End of story. Go buy your wife a new strap-on and stop worrying about yourself.

Final thought: why the hell doesn't Literotica have "bisexual" or "male bisexual" listed as a story category?!

Sir, you rock!!!
 
cum

Great post. Reminds me of an old saying....You suck one cock and your a cock sucker. If you drive one truck our not a truck driver? WTF.

If it feels good do it. Life is too damn short.

just love cum and cock
 
Back
Top