"I think we've found an answer to autism."

[HumpDayHoratio]

NOBODY is against finding a cure for autism.

You’re just lying.

F’n clown.



We. Told. Them. So.

Sure you are. The first step is nailing down a cause. Trust the science man.

 

[Lazaran]

You and FP share a common bond in your vitriolic hatred for conservatives. Especially wrt the posts you guys make about Trump.

Who is BabyBoobs referring to with“FP”??? Is that like “Charlie Cook??? President Biden’s “grandson Navy”???



Also:

BabyBoobs "thinks" DonOld is a “conservative” in any positive sense / interpretation of the word.



BabyBoobs



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[ll74]

While we’re at it. Can we address the elephant in the room? The little Furry Charlies assassin was buggering? We have a whole bunch of Radicalized democrats going to great lengths to protect this little rodent.

Was he a squirrel? A dog? WTF is wrong with you people?

Why is this an "elephant in the room"?

Does their pajama outfit bother you?

 

[Lazaran]

Sure you are. The first step is nailing down a cause. Trust the science man.

F’n clown



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[HisArpy]

You and FP share a common bond in your vitriolic hatred for conservatives. Especially wrt the posts you guys make about Trump.

The one unifying thing about their posts is that, even taken collectively, those posts are about as intelligent as an entire row of them strung together with wire.

 

[DeluxAuto]

I do love how President Trump makes these Radicalized democrats take the WRONG side of every issue! . I mean…who’s against finding a cause/cure for autism?

F’n clowns.

Radicalized.

Drink!

 

[DeluxAuto]

The one unifying thing about their posts is that, even taken collectively, those posts are about as intelligent as an entire row of them strung together with wire.

Carbon boy who doxxed himself has opinions.

 

[Mrtenant]

 

[TastySuckToy]

A right-minded individual would want the Epstein files released.

And it would be nice if they were. We'll see what happens, but I have effectively zero trust in government.

 

[dmallord]

And it would be nice if they were. We'll see what happens, but I have effectively zero trust in government.

My trust level is higher, about $0.02 worth of the current one.

 

[Baztrachian]

Vaccines don't cause autism

Then there's no harm in studying vaccines and the possible subsequent onset of autism symptoms in young children. If you are right then doing a proper study with a control group and peer review on the process (not the outcome) won't change a thing.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

 

[ll74]

Then there's no harm in studying vaccines and the possible subsequent onset of autism symptoms in young children.

Correct.

The harm caused would be when people arrive at incorrect conclusions based on the studies, especially our HHS Secretary.

If you are right then doing a proper study with a control group and peer review on the process (not the outcome) won't change a thing.

Plenty of studies have already been performed and plenty are ongoing.

 

[Baztrachian]

Correct.

The harm caused would be when people arrive at incorrect conclusions based on the studies, especially our HHS Secretary.

You're assuming the conclusions are incorrect before the study is complete. That's not science, that's orthodoxy.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

Then there's no harm in studying vaccines and the possible subsequent onset of autism symptoms in young children. If you are right then doing a proper study with a control group and peer review on the process (not the outcome) won't change a thing.

These studies were finished years ago. There's no connection between vaccines and autism.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

View attachment 2566347

Babies get shots. Babies die. These are facts. There's no link between these facts.
Did you know that the average human dies roughly 78 years after being born? Touching a vagina is deadly, apparently.

 

[Baztrachian]

These studies were finished years ago. There's no connection between vaccines and autism.

There is no such thing as settled science. You can always study something again and employ new technologies and new techniques.

 

[Baztrachian]

Touching a vagina is deadly, apparently.

In your case I'll defer to your wisdom.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

In your case I'll defer to your wisdom.

Good man. In your car it would be instantly.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

There is no such thing as settled science. You can always study something again and employ new technologies and new techniques.

'Allo mate. Listen up, you need it apparently, I'll tell ya how science gets on with it, plain and simple, init. It's not about proving things are right, it's about trying to prove 'em wrong. That's the main geezer, Karl Popper, his big idea: falsification.

A lot of people think science works by just collecting a bunch of evidence to prove a theory. They reckon if you see a million white swans, you can say, "All swans are white." But that's a mug's game. What happens when you finally spot a black one? Your whole theory is bang out of order.

Popper's idea is way smarter. He says a proper scientific theory ain't worth a sausage unless it can be tested and, more importantly, falsified. It's gotta be able to be proven wrong.
Here's the rub:
A scientist comes up with a theory, a proper bold one. Like, "All swans are white."
Then, they don't go lookin' for more white swans to prove it. No, they go huntin' for a black one. They try their best to bust the theory. If they find a black swan, the theory is falsified, or disproven. It's a goner. Time to go back to the drawing board and come up with a better theory, like "Swans can be white or black."
If they look everywhere and can't find a black swan, the theory ain't "proven" right. Nah, it just gets to stick around for a bit longer. It's corroborated. It's survived the test, but it's always on probation.
This is how science moves forward, see? It's a continuous cycle of makin' bold claims and then tryin' your best to knock 'em down. The theories that last are the ones that have stood up to the toughest challenges. It's all about bein' open to the idea that you might be wrong, rather than just lookin' for proof that you're right. Simple as that, innit.

 

[DeluxAuto]

View attachment 2566347

When did thousands of babies die in their sleep?

Holy fucking hell.

 

[Baztrachian]

A scientist comes up with a theory, a proper bold one. Like, "All vaccines are good because they are called vaccines."

Then, they don't go lookin' for any evidence to prove it. No, they just say this and assume it is true. They try their best to bust anyone who challeneges the theory. If they find a someone who challenges the orthodoxy he's a goner.

If they look everywhere and can't find anyone brave enough to challenge the theory, the theory is "proven" right.

This is how science moves forward in the world today, see? It's a continuous cycle of makin' bold claims and then tryin' your best to knock down anyone who challenges them. The theories that last are the ones that that the state and the media say will last.

It's all about believing in what you've been told to believe instead of being open to the idea of proving something for yourself. Simple as that, innit.

 

[Baztrachian]

When did thousands of babies die in their sleep?

Holy fucking hell.

https://tuzarapost.substack.com/p/six-major-studies-find-78-of-sudden

 

[ll74]

You're assuming the conclusions are incorrect before the study is complete.

No, I'm understanding that our HHS Secretary is not operating with any understanding of the studies and in fact is cherry picking data to support his ignorant biased.

That's not science, that's orthodoxy.

Studies have already been done and have supported the conclusion that vaccines do not cause autism.

A sufficient numbers of studies have been done that give me (and a majority of infectious disease and vaccine scientists) proper confidence in that conclusion.

You can keep working towards a.conclusion that you have already reached which disagrees with that assessment, but I have high confidence that the studies won't arrive at that conclusion.

 

[DeluxAuto]

https://tuzarapost.substack.com/p/six-major-studies-find-78-of-sudden

You really need comprehension lessons.