"I think we've found an answer to autism."

[Meekly_Anna]

A scientist comes up with a theory, a proper bold one. Like, "All vaccines are good because they are called vaccines."

Then, they don't go lookin' for any evidence to prove it. No, they just say this and assume it is true. They try their best to bust anyone who challeneges the theory. If they find a someone who challenges the orthodoxy he's a goner.

If they look everywhere and can't find anyone brave enough to challenge the theory, the theory is "proven" right.

This is how science moves forward in the world today, see? It's a continuous cycle of makin' bold claims and then tryin' your best to knock down anyone who challenges them. The theories that last are the ones that that the state and the media say will last.

It's all about believing in what you've been told to believe instead of being open to the idea of proving something for yourself. Simple as that, innit.

Bloody hellfire, you are dump as a Trump.
Try to understand what a double-blind study is before you continue ejaculating your nonsense onto the keyboard.

 

[pinkparkhorse]

This is so fucking stupid.

 

[Baztrachian]

Good man. In your car it would be instantly.

Sweetie, not even in your wildest dreams would I ever let you into my car.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

Sweetie, not even in your wildest dreams would I ever let you into my car.

What sane person would even dream of that?

 

[LilKitKat]

https://tuzarapost.substack.com/p/six-major-studies-find-78-of-sudden

you are quoting the Tuzara Post Newsletter?!
I mean...they just gather shit from social media and make it a story.
At least use fucking Faux News as a source or something where they directly make bullshit up instead of reposting bullshit

 

[Nay_Nay01]

https://themighty.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/12112271_10153748686212450_7932325765295769845_n.jpg

 

[Meekly_Anna]

https://themighty.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/12112271_10153748686212450_7932325765295769845_n.jpg

That's even better than my "touching vagina kills".

 

[TastySuckToy]

Anyone with a scientific mindset welcomes sound criticism and re examination. That is the core of scientific rigor.

"Settled science" is the motto and mindset of the brainwashed who've simply swapped religion for another different sounding one.

For example, the Earth being a globe could be labeled 'settled science', but that motto isn't a valid argument. You take actual valid arguments and evidence for the scientific conclusion of the globe Earth, and have fun beating idiot flat Earthers over the head with it. Maybe even monetize the activity with things like Youtube channels.

 

[Baztrachian]

Try to understand what a double-blind study is before you continue ejaculating your nonsense onto the keyboard.

 

[Lazaran]

https://tuzarapost.substack.com/p/six-major-studies-find-78-of-sudden

Before vaccines: Infant mortality (and general mortality) through the roof and the population is fairly static.

After vaccines: Infant mortality (and general mortality)! plummets and the population spikes.

(The suffering associated with the diseases that vaccines prevented plummeted as well).

But, sure, vaccines are bad…

(And, yes, there very well may be RARE instances where a bad reaction to a vaccine / a component of a vaccine leads to a negative outcome such as injury or death, but overall???)



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

View attachment 2566394

And why should one thing have anything to do with the other?
As is often the case with you, your statement makes no sense whatsoever.

 

[Mrtenant]

https://tuzarapost.substack.com/p/six-major-studies-find-78-of-sudden

Joe Tuzara MD? Lol, bruh.

 

[dmallord]

There is no such thing as settled science. You can always study something again and employ new technologies and new techniques.

Taking a walk out on a pirate’s plank here. But, not being a doctor, I would rely on the research data available to date. Anna scores the most points on this, and the rest of us are a tad behind. However, some seem to be using cherry-picked information without much scrutiny of those studies and citations, like the local gazette one. A long history of research shows that vaccines are safer than harmful. Yes, more studies can certainly be conducted. However, allowing a non-doctor, such as RFK Jr., to make those decisions preemptively for our nation is harmful to medicine. Given his history, his own brain issues, his lies to Congress during his appointment confirmation hearing, his questionable drug use in his younger days, and more lies as he fired the previous advisory board and only selected those who support his views, this is problematic. It’s like having voted for a felon, akin to 'dear-leader syndrome'.

“Ninety percent of SIDS deaths occur within the first 6 months of life, with the rate peaking between 1 to 4 months. Death comes suddenly and unpredictably, usually during sleep.

"Is there a causal relationship between the fact that babies can receive their first vaccines, such as the Hepatitis B vaccine, at birth, and the fact that most begin their routine immunization schedule at 2 months old with shots for diseases like rotavirus, DTaP, Hib, polio, and pneumococcal?

"Evidence showing vaccines lower infant mortality from the American Academy of Pediatrics:

"Reduced childhood deaths: A 2024 study published in The Lancet estimated that routine vaccination since 1974 has averted 154 million deaths globally, 101 million of which were among infants. The researchers concluded that vaccination accounted for 40% of the decline in global infant mortality over the past 50 years.

"Declined SIDS rates: Concerns about a link between vaccination and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) are not supported by scientific evidence. Since the "Back-to-Sleep" campaign was introduced in the early 1990s, SIDS rates in the U.S. have dropped by more than 50% during a period when the number of recommended vaccines increased. Some studies even suggest vaccines may have a protective effect against SIDS.

"Addressing the "coincidence" of SIDS timing: The peak age for SIDS (2–4 months) coincides with the timing of multiple routine vaccinations. This has led some to falsely assume a connection, but extensive research has found no causal link. It is statistically expected that some infants will die of SIDS shortly after receiving a vaccination by pure chance.

“Disputed claims of correlation

"An alternative perspective was presented in a 2011 study by Miller and Goldman, which claimed a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses and infant mortality rates in highly developed nations. However, this study and its subsequent updates have been widely criticized and challenged for their methodology.

"Critiques of Miller and Goldman's work:

"Re-analyses of the data, such as a 2022 study on the preprint server medRxiv, found that Miller and Goldman's conclusion could only be reached by omitting a large portion of the available data.

"When controlling for important variables like income inequality and healthcare access, re-analyses found that the number of vaccine doses did not predict higher infant mortality.

“Research has shown that human development factors are far more influential predictors of infant mortality than the number of vaccines on a schedule.”

~~~

If you want to seem more solid and less biased in tooting your ‘opinion’, one should consider adding a little for ‘substantive evidence’, unlike https://tuzarapost.substack.com/p/six-major-studies-find-78-of-sudden, rather than drum beating as support. So… we all should say…

 

[Baztrachian]

Taking a walk out on a pirate’s plank here. But, not being a doctor, I would rely on the research data available to date. Anna scores the most points on this, and the rest of us are a tad behind. However, some seem to be using cherry-picked information without much scrutiny of those studies and citations, like the local gazette one. A long history of research shows that vaccines are safer than harmful. Yes, more studies can certainly be conducted. However, allowing a non-doctor, such as RFK Jr., to make those decisions preemptively for our nation is harmful to medicine. Given his history, his own brain issues, his lies to Congress during his appointment confirmation hearing, his questionable drug use in his younger days, and more lies as he fired the previous advisory board and only selected those who support his views, this is problematic. It’s like having voted for a felon, akin to 'dear-leader syndrome'.

“Ninety percent of SIDS deaths occur within the first 6 months of life, with the rate peaking between 1 to 4 months. Death comes suddenly and unpredictably, usually during sleep.

"Is there a causal relationship between the fact that babies can receive their first vaccines, such as the Hepatitis B vaccine, at birth, and the fact that most begin their routine immunization schedule at 2 months old with shots for diseases like rotavirus, DTaP, Hib, polio, and pneumococcal?

"Evidence showing vaccines lower infant mortality from the American Academy of Pediatrics:

"Reduced childhood deaths: A 2024 study published in The Lancet estimated that routine vaccination since 1974 has averted 154 million deaths globally, 101 million of which were among infants. The researchers concluded that vaccination accounted for 40% of the decline in global infant mortality over the past 50 years.

"Declined SIDS rates: Concerns about a link between vaccination and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) are not supported by scientific evidence. Since the "Back-to-Sleep" campaign was introduced in the early 1990s, SIDS rates in the U.S. have dropped by more than 50% during a period when the number of recommended vaccines increased. Some studies even suggest vaccines may have a protective effect against SIDS.

"Addressing the "coincidence" of SIDS timing: The peak age for SIDS (2–4 months) coincides with the timing of multiple routine vaccinations. This has led some to falsely assume a connection, but extensive research has found no causal link. It is statistically expected that some infants will die of SIDS shortly after receiving a vaccination by pure chance.

“Disputed claims of correlation

"An alternative perspective was presented in a 2011 study by Miller and Goldman, which claimed a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses and infant mortality rates in highly developed nations. However, this study and its subsequent updates have been widely criticized and challenged for their methodology.

"Critiques of Miller and Goldman's work:

"Re-analyses of the data, such as a 2022 study on the preprint server medRxiv, found that Miller and Goldman's conclusion could only be reached by omitting a large portion of the available data.

"When controlling for important variables like income inequality and healthcare access, re-analyses found that the number of vaccine doses did not predict higher infant mortality.

“Research has shown that human development factors are far more influential predictors of infant mortality than the number of vaccines on a schedule.”

~~~

If you want to seem more solid and less biased in tooting your ‘opinion’, one should consider adding a little for ‘substantive evidence’, unlike https://tuzarapost.substack.com/p/six-major-studies-find-78-of-sudden, rather than drum beating as support. So… we all should say…

First, my deepest respect for your measured and reasoned response.

I will speak to my own position.

I think proven vaccines are awesome. As a kid I got the smallpox vaccine, the polio vaccine, measles, and mumps as well. And I never had them because these vaccines were proven and they worked.

All of them came with side effects and the people behind them were (mostly) honest about those side effects and individuals had the choice to take them or not.

This changed with the mRNA treatment that turned out not to be a vaccine.

At first we were told that it was "100% safe and 100% effective" despite absolutely no clinical studies to substantiate this wild claim.

Then it was only 95% effective. Then they abandoned the 'effective' claim and said that the mRNA shot would 'reduce symptoms'.

Fucking Theraflu does that.

And going back to the vaccines I've had I did not get smallpox with reduced symptoms. Because I was vaccinated with an actual vaccine I did not get it at all. Ditto with polio, measles, and mumps.

Also with mRNA was this shrill demand from too many crazy people that more or less said that their vaccine would not work unless I had it too. These people blamed people like me for why they got eight shots and they still got COVID.

WTF????

In any case, at this point it is time to do the clinical trials and to find out exactly what mRNA does since it is not a vaccine.

 

[Baztrachian]

 

[Baztrachian]

 

[ll74]

View attachment 2566454

The thread is about autism

 

[dmallord]

First, my deepest respect for your measured and reasoned response.

I will speak to my own position.

I think proven vaccines are awesome. As a kid I got the smallpox vaccine, the polio vaccine, measles, and mumps as well. And I never had them because these vaccines were proven and they worked.

All of them came with side effects and the people behind them were (mostly) honest about those side effects and individuals had the choice to take them or not.

This changed with the mRNA treatment that turned out not to be a vaccine.

At first we were told that it was "100% safe and 100% effective" despite absolutely no clinical studies to substantiate this wild claim.

Then it was only 95% effective. Then they abandoned the 'effective' claim and said that the mRNA shot would 'reduce symptoms'.

Fucking Theraflu does that.

And going back to the vaccines I've had I did not get smallpox with reduced symptoms. Because I was vaccinated with an actual vaccine I did not get it at all. Ditto with polio, measles, and mumps.

Also with mRNA was this shrill demand from too many crazy people that more or less said that their vaccine would not work unless I had it too. These people blamed people like me for why they got eight shots and they still got COVID.

WTF????

In any case, at this point it is time to do the clinical trials and to find out exactly what mRNA does since it is not a vaccine.

I have no problem with that. Just don't deny those who want the vaccine to obtain it meanwhile. That's a prudent action. Not the blanket freeze on the ability to get it while RFKJr messes with data.

Growing up without the vaccine for Polio, I saw the results first hand. When it became commonly administered, I no longer saw kids in leg braces hobbling around from its effects. I was fortunate as well not have had it. In the military I got shot with who knows what standing in line at the inoculation tables. I didn't get a choice nor did I dispute them. It seemed the thing to do. But, that's a different story.

 

[RoryN]

Bump this thread every day they don't have an answer to autism.

Bump!

 

[ll74]

The "action" plan is hilarious.

None of this shit will do anything for autism.

 

[Baztrachian]

The "action" plan is hilarious.

None of this shit will do anything for autism.

And what if it does?

 

[ll74]

And what if it does?

Lol

Our HHS Secretary fired anyone with knowledge and expertise.

He's relying on his worm.brain

And he still believes vaccines cause autism.

 

[Baztrachian]

Lol

You should look up Barry Marshall and Robin Warren. They won a Nobel Prize for challenging a medical/scientific/BigPharma orthodoxy.

 

[ll74]

You should look up Barry Marshall and Robin Warren. They won a Nobel Prize for challenging a medical/scientific/BigPharma orthodoxy.

Lol

Tylenol has a 4% risk of autism correlation.

In a few studies.

This is a case of making stupid promises and making up shit to save face.

It's not about big pharma. Nothing about this is about big pharma.

It's about ego and stupidity.

 

[dmallord]

It's almost the end of the day. Did anyone find out what the felon's solution for autism was yet?