Large clitoral vs small vaginal orgasms

clittyrub

Loves Spam
Joined
Feb 27, 2011
Posts
208
Hi! So.
I'm curious about this. My clitoral orgasms always seem much stronger than my vaginal orgasms. I know the clitoris is the more sensitive spots with it being a little bundle of nerves and all. But my issue is...the orgasms I experience when I'm having intercourse are so small that I don't even know I'm having one until the guy pulls out. Don't get me wrong...I can happily enjoy sex with the right guy. And I've had some pretty good sex. But no one has ever been able to get me to have even a medium sized vaginal orgasm. Is it possible to do something about it? Like kegal exercises or something? I don't want to rub my clitoris the entire time I'm having sex with a guy...that's just cumbersome...
Any thoughts?
 
My first response is to tell you that you just have not met the right lover as of yet. Do any of these guys ever whisper in your year if you are close? Do they ask you if you like this or would you rather have me touch another spot, etc.

The right lover will be considerate enough and respect you enough to ensure your pleasure before their own. If they don't... they don't deserve to be with you.
 
Have your clitoris circumcised. Problem solved!



asshole....that's not even a subject to joke about. Many women have endured this horrible procedure.. do you laugh about rape victims too? Mentally challenged? Cancer patients?


Fuckhead.
 
Hmm I expect a torrent of negativity from you.

Actually I've been researching this topic as part of my organizations foreign ideas program. In Chad, for instance most women actually demand this procedure and feel that the institution which is very ancient by the way, benefits society as a whole! It seems that the removal of the clitoris helps many problems with women just as male circumcision can benefit men.
 
One thing my wife and I have done is I either lick or rub her clit until she has an orgasm then I immediately fuck her until I cum. It's a big rush for me to make her cum and makes my orgasm that much stronger.

Also I've seen rings or half rings that fit around the base of a cock that has a vibrating parts that contact the clit when fucking.

Good luck!
 
Hmm I expect a torrent of negativity from you.

Actually I've been researching this topic as part of my organizations foreign ideas program. In Chad, for instance most women actually demand this procedure and feel that the institution which is very ancient by the way, benefits society as a whole! It seems that the removal of the clitoris helps many problems with women just as male circumcision can benefit men.




thats bullshit....there is absolutely NO comparison to removing some extra skin on a mans penis, to cutting off an entire clitoris. There is no medical reason for that procedure to be done to a woman.

Of course you're gonna expect negativity..you're an idiot...and a poor excuse for a troll.
 
thats bullshit....there is absolutely NO comparison to removing some extra skin on a mans penis, to cutting off an entire clitoris. There is no medical reason for that procedure to be done to a woman.

Of course you're gonna expect negativity..you're an idiot...and a poor excuse for a troll.

Oh dear, by their words thou shalt know them! So you are trolling this thread and you are an idiot... Although I suspect your're really clever if you try to be!

Theres are many medical reasons but also ethical ones as well. The OP spelt out a problem that could be solved with such a procedure. For by limiting the stimulus in one area, it may grow in another!
 
Well then why do so many women from the other side of the world actually request this procedure then!? Seems like there must be something to it. I mean we have medical procedures for everything! So if you've got a problem with your clitoris, solve it! If not, then ok.
 
Ok heres some info I dug up bout it

"And as is known these benefits so not reach the level of importance of the benefits of male circumcision. However, they are benefits and productive of good effects.

Here are some of the benefits which have been discovered:

1) A reduction of infections resulting from microbes gathering under the hood of the clitoris.

2) Attacks of herpes and genital ulcers are less severe and less harmful with men and women who have been circumcised.

3) A further benefit that is apparent for women and more so for their husbands, is that women of hot climates often have a large clitoris which arouses their desires when it rubs against the adjacent clothing. It may even grow to such a size that sexual intercourse is not possible. Therefore, circumcision reduces her desires and their effects in the first case, and makes intercourse possible in the second case."

See maybe a solution!

Of course when we were just vikings, male circumcision sounded barbaric too but we got used to it!
 
Well then why do so many women from the other side of the world actually request this procedure then!? Seems like there must be something to it. I mean we have medical procedures for everything! So if you've got a problem with your clitoris, solve it! If not, then ok.

Could it be cultural pressure? Ignorance? Shame? The kind of shame you are attempting to offload on this young woman? After all most of the infibulations are conducted by women in family groups. Your research is sadly lacking if you think there are any possible medical reasons for this procedure...in fact a large number of women die unnecessarily undergoing child birth when their birth canal is ripped or sliced open because it has been sealed so closed.

But ask yourself this...why is the movement against such procedure led by women, most especially those who have gone through this? Including Wairis Dirie a well known catwalk model
 
Ok heres some info I dug up bout it

"And as is known these benefits so not reach the level of importance of the benefits of male circumcision. However, they are benefits and productive of good effects.

Here are some of the benefits which have been discovered:

1) A reduction of infections resulting from microbes gathering under the hood of the clitoris.

2) Attacks of herpes and genital ulcers are less severe and less harmful with men and women who have been circumcised.

3) A further benefit that is apparent for women and more so for their husbands, is that women of hot climates often have a large clitoris which arouses their desires when it rubs against the adjacent clothing. It may even grow to such a size that sexual intercourse is not possible. Therefore, circumcision reduces her desires and their effects in the first case, and makes intercourse possible in the second case."

See maybe a solution!

Of course when we were just vikings, male circumcision sounded barbaric too but we got used to it!

Seriously? can you actually back that assertion up with an actual verified scientific study?

I think you should read some more Preacher man...your ignorance is truly showing now
 
Could it be cultural pressure? Ignorance? Shame? The kind of shame you are attempting to offload on this young woman? After all most of the infibulations are conducted by women in family groups. Your research is sadly lacking if you think there are any possible medical reasons for this procedure...in fact a large number of women die unnecessarily undergoing child birth when their birth canal is ripped or sliced open because it has been sealed so closed.

But ask yourself this...why is the movement against such procedure led by women, most especially those who have gone through this? Including Wairis Dirie a well known catwalk model

Well obviously there are some bad stories coming out of africa,.... well its the same with men, you know if they chop too much...

No, but perhaps if it were done with the care of modern science a new procedure could be developed! Also some of the women who ran away were influenced by western culture so of course they didn't want to do it.
 
Well obviously there are some bad stories coming out of africa,.... well its the same with men, you know if they chop too much...

No, but perhaps if it were done with the care of modern science a new procedure could be developed! Also some of the women who ran away were influenced by western culture so of course they didn't want to do it.

I give up...
 
Ok heres a quote from NY Times...

"Dr. Shweder says that many Westerners trying to impose a “zero tolerance” policy don’t realize that these initiation rites are generally controlled not by men but by women who believe it is a cosmetic procedure with aesthetic benefits. He criticizes Americans and Europeans for outlawing it at the same they endorse their own forms of genital modification, like the circumcision of boys or the cosmetic surgery for women called “vaginal rejuvenation.” After surveying studies of female circumcision and comparing the data with the rhetoric about its harmfulness, Dr. Shweder concludes that “‘First World’ feminist issues and political correctness and activism have triumphed over the critical assessment of evidence.”

If I were asked to make a decision about my own daughter, I wouldn’t choose circumcision for her. But what about the question raised by these anthropologists: Should outsiders be telling African women what initiation practices are acceptable?"
 
damn you and your logic!!

I assume thats not directed to Janey...

Hate hate hate, you're just full of it! If you can't think logically how do you know what you actually think?!! Ever asked that?

Wow I seem to have generated some fierce replies here, but wait could it be because of western cultural bias? Should we not open our minds to what other cultures have to say and not immediately damn them as primitive? Why do we assume that we know better than everyone else?

Am I the only one here who can explore dangerous topics without getting unreasonable!?
 
I assume thats not directed to Janey...

Hate hate hate, you're just full of it! If you can't think logically how do you know what you actually think?!! Ever asked that?

Wow I seem to have generated some fierce replies here, but wait could it be because of western cultural bias? Should we not open our minds to what other cultures have to say and not immediately damn them as primitive? Why do we assume that we know better than everyone else?

Am I the only one here who can explore dangerous topics without getting unreasonable!?

---------------------------------

Your projection and redirection fails miserably. Of course I wasn't talking about you. We're talking about a barbaric ritual here. Period...just because they do it, or have done it for a billion years, doesn't make it right..any more than slavery, sacrificing virigins or any of the other messed up things people have done for eons.

There's nothing to open your mind to here. And btw, you started out unreasonable and have only further proven your ignorance with your other postings.
 
---------------------------------

Your projection and redirection fails miserably. Of course I wasn't talking about you. We're talking about a barbaric ritual here. Period...just because they do it, or have done it for a billion years, doesn't make it right..any more than slavery, sacrificing virigins or any of the other messed up things people have done for eons.

There's nothing to open your mind to here. And btw, you started out unreasonable and have only further proven your ignorance with your other postings.

Well at least I'm capable of a civil and balanced conversation....

Hey look if you can convince me that this is absolutely bad, well then I'll accept it!

By the way, don't you think your country still practices slavery?
 
By the way, don't you think your country still practices slavery?

Yes, and sometimes it rears its ugly head in the form of organized religion by telling us what to think, how to vote, to give money to the church while some of their followers go hungry, hiding some of their sexual preditors.
 
Back
Top