Literotica's All-time Best "Worst Public Feedback" List

[sr71plt]

The basher wasn't my warmly-remembered friend, "DEATH TO ALL POOFS!!" was it? Bless his little cotton socks. He must have wandered into the "Gay Male" section by accident and not have been able to back-click before making it to the sex scene on the second Lit page. It's shocking what our readers are subjected to.

Yep, I think that was my February/March friend. No comment on the story, really; just death threats to a whole class of people. And then really livid when the comment was simply deleted.

 

[sr71plt]

Does she think that's all a writer does?



But...it was in fetish with a clear description.



But...it was in fetish with a clear description.



Thank you for staying with the story for three chapters of the same stuff.

Ah, the "wrong section" comment. I get those on Gay Male stories occasionally. News flash, though. First and foremost, you have to put the stories where the readers are. Gays don't go roaming all of the board looking for their stories--they go to one category.

 

[jomar]

Ah, the "wrong section" comment. I get those on Gay Male stories occasionally. News flash, though. First and foremost, you have to put the stories where the readers are. Gays don't go roaming all of the board looking for their stories--they go to one category.

No news flash, I understand that. But there was a bit more going on, plus that fact that it was very clear in the story description where it was going to end up.

 

[sr71plt]

No news flash, I understand that. But there was a bit more going on, plus that fact that it was very clear in the story description where it was going to end up.

That was a public "news flash," not for you personally, I hope you understood. I understand that in your example you were talking very different category considerations.

 

[Scribbled]

I'm laughing at the feedback that was slapped on my story that posted today (but, of course, which is now gone--but which resulted in more punishing voting). So at least one of us is amused and not cowed by abusive bullies. That amuses me and is very much in keeping with the thread, I think.

I now regret I didn't bring the comment here and add it to the thread.

(still standing on my head and wiggling my ears--trying for that laugh.)

Here's the comment to which you refer:

Hmm. Some people are really full of themselves, huh? That is not a story; it's the rambling of someone with not an ounce of imagination! A third grader could have done better than this!

I copied the story earlier to read off-line later. The comment is with what I saved. The subject matter isn't my cup of tea, but I wanted to read some of your work to determine if you are mostly smoke and mirrors like Club Prima Donna, or if you can actually write worth a lick.

 

[BlackShanglan]

I love the totalitarian category definitionists. I love them so much that I made up the word "definititionist" for them. But surely we all know and love them - those people who invent their own bizarre and idiosyncratic definitions of categories, then attack every story that doesn't fit them, often with delightfully deranged PC's indicating that they believe themselves to be on an instructive crusade to purify the genre. Whether they're firebombing a "Group Sex" story because one of the many sex scenes only involves two people or pouring their venom on any "Loving Wives" offering that involves a condom, they're an eternal joy and charm.

 

[jomar]

That was a public "news flash," not for you personally, I hope you understood. I understand that in your example you were talking very different category considerations.

Sorry, my misunderstanding.

 

[sr71plt]

Here's the comment to which you refer:

Hmm. Some people are really full of themselves, huh? That is not a story; it's the rambling of someone with not an ounce of imagination! A third grader could have done better than this!

I copied the story earlier to read off-line later. The comment is with what I saved. The subject matter isn't my cup of tea, but I wanted to read some of your work to determine if you are mostly smoke and mirrors like Club Prima Donna, or if you can actually write worth a lick.

Yes, that was the comment. I have it copied too, but I wasn't going to post it, because the first sentence makes it obvious that this vitrol doesn't flow from a story at all--it comes from something going on elsewhere and exhibits an all-too-familiar out of control vehemence that has its match in an identifiable place.

Not that I feel the need to defend my work (which you can take or leave as you like; I get paid for it, so it's good enough for me), but a review of the comments on the over 200 stories I've posted on Lit. in the past year seem to go in an opposite direction of the "have no imagination" comment. But some specific stories--no, imagination not required--nor much storytelling either, for that matter. They are just meant to be straightforward "relief" stories. I like variety in my writing. And when you write a lot in a short time, there are all types of works included.

How interesting that you just happened to have copied the comment though. I suppose I should be all aglow at the attention.

If you can tell me what is your cup of tea, chances are good I've got a story posted on Lit. about that (not Loving Wives, certainly, but there's one Incest one if you have the same interests as Scouries--you could try "In Every Port.")

And, no, it won't mean a thing to me if you come scurrying back to report on every missed comma. These stories aren't edited and everyone needs an editor behind them for finished copy. These are writings for my enjoyment, and as they got posted at a rate of better than one every two days for a year, they didn't go through a whole lot of review. Still, if you think the basic writing sucks--then, for you, it does.

One does wonder if "club" membership here includes condoning projecting a forum argument onto one-bombing and bad mouthing stories. This comes well within my definition of trolling--and most certainly augments abusive posting behavior.

 

[Shitting_Bull]

Here's the comment to which you refer:

Hmm. Some people are really full of themselves, huh? That is not a story; it's the rambling of someone with not an ounce of imagination! A third grader could have done better than this!

I copied the story earlier to read off-line later. The comment is with what I saved. The subject matter isn't my cup of tea, but I wanted to read some of your work to determine if you are mostly smoke and mirrors like Club Prima Donna, or if you can actually write worth a lick.

That comment sure sound like an Indian to me, and it wasn't yours truly. That was a squaw.

 

[cloudy]

That comment sure sound like an Indian to me, and it wasn't yours truly. That was a squaw.

Sorry, sweetheart. Wasn't me.

Your obsession is showing.

 

[lindiana]

Oh let me get on this

I love this feedback off my story "Father Confesses":

"damn
11/07/05 By: Anonymous in new jersey
you rapped your daughter. how could you? that is the worst thing a father can do to his sweet little girl. well i can say the story was hot, it got my panties very wet. "

I kind of considered it a compliment since they thought I was the father in the story and, ummm, I'm female. I was born that way and plan to die that way too.

This one I actually only read for the first time the other day and it is two years old. Oh well, I like it!

From my story "Traffic Lights":

"An idea for a story…
09/06/05 By: KOLKORE in USA
Ok lindiana, I confess, you have succeeded to confuse me. In this stylized riddle tale, the repeated question is the key to the story, so you can not get away without giving us the key, right? So where is it??
Without any answer it’s just a weird or a spooky story or both, not to mention the unpleasant feeling of being misled by an unfulfilled underlying promise to provide a key. “Have you ever really felt him?” asks the voice, “no” we answer, “we have no idea what the hec you are talking about!” Speaking of which, how come the woman never speculates on the meaning of this repeating voice?
I would say that at this point, what you have is a nice initial idea for a story. Why won’t you write it now? I would love to read it when it’s ready. "

It was too cerebral I guess.

Then of course there was this tasty morsel on the Boards (I don't think I have to mention which thread):

"see your Incest category story “The Professor’s Daughter” posted yesterday has exactly one (1) public comment. After reading it, I can see why. You might want to peruse Scouries’ masterpieces to get a glimmer of what the Literotica readership wants in terms of an erotically entertaining Incest category story.

I also note that you have “How-to” category stories entitled “US English 101: Parts of a Sentence” and US English 101: The Phrase.” At the beginning of those two stories, you indicate you have a Bachelor of Science degree in Secondary Education/English. Say what? In your latest story “The Professor’s Daughter,” your grammar is terrible! It’s almost as bad as that of Literotica award-winning author TxRad.

I’d like to see what sr71plt has to say about “The Professor’s Daughter” since he claims to be a professional editor."

and that wasn't enough, he had to add this:

"Obviously Scouries is much more proficient at teaching “Sex and the Modern Woman” at the University of Miami than you are at teaching yourself writing.

First of all, you don’t have a clue that when two independent clauses are joined by a conjunction (you know, like “and” or “but”), you put a comma between them. In your story “The Professor’s Daughter,” you are missing about a hundred commas.

Your dialogue is pitiful. Take this sentence, which is paragraph 5:

“David, it’s Garrett.” He said unconvincingly into the receiver.

It should be a comma after Garrett, and He should not be capitalized. You repeatedly butcher dialog like that.

I could go on and on and on regarding other errors.

You might flunk Scouries for his grammar, but I’m sure he would likewise flunk you for not knowing anything about sex and the modern woman (that is beyond obvious in your story).

Now sr71plt might recommend that you obtain a copy of The Chicago Manual of Style (it’s not about fashion) and read it to TxRad who can slaughter the written word even better than you. I would, however, suggest euthanasia for both you and TxRad, at least with respect to your literary efforts."

How sad scouries still hasn't got his multiple personalities in check.

 

[sr71plt]

That comment sure sound like an Indian to me, and it wasn't yours truly. That was a squaw.

Oh, I know who it was. Not going to cow me, though--although there seem to be a lot of other sheep around here who condone a lot as long as it's done to someone outside the club.

 

[BlackShanglan]

That comment sure sound like an Indian to me, and it wasn't yours truly. That was a squaw.

If that's Cloudy's semicolon I will eat my horseshoes. It's not her style at all.

 

[sr71plt]

I love this feedback off my story "Father Confesses":

"damn
11/07/05 By: Anonymous in new jersey
you rapped your daughter. how could you? that is the worst thing a father can do to his sweet little girl. well i can say the story was hot, it got my panties very wet. "

Oh, please assure me that the daughter wasn't rapped by the father! (but if he did this, did she make a sound like a ripe melon when it's thumped in the store?)

 

[BlackShanglan]

Oh, I know who it was. Not going to cow me, though--although there seem to be a lot of other sheep around here who condone a lot as long as it's done to someone outside the club.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=24042955&postcount=66

Once daily or as needed while symptoms persist.

 

[LadyCibelle]

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=24042955&postcount=66

Once daily or as needed while symptoms persist.

Pepsi spew!

Shang, I love you!!

 

[sr71plt]

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=24042955&postcount=66

Once daily or as needed while symptoms persist.

Ah yes, speaking of sheep. There's one bah, bahing now. Talk about two-faced.

 

[Recidiva]

Ah yes, speaking of sheep. There's one bah, bahing now. Talk about two-faced.

http://images.despair.com/products/demotivators/dysfunction.jpg

 

[LadyCibelle]

http://images.despair.com/products/demotivators/dysfunction.jpg

Diva,

Can I kiss you, huggle you and plain worship you?

 

[Guest]

As for Lady C., bless her for giving you something to do with your time. You know quite well that you're miserable when no one feels like playing with you - or do I need to post the links to you posting repeatedly to yourself to say that the thread's over and only someone who wanted an argument would keep posting to it? Play nicely, now, and Lady C. will let you keep pulling her pigtails.

 

[BlackShanglan]

Ah yes, speaking of sheep. There's one bah, bahing now. Talk about two-faced.

Bah. Bah. Humbug.

I'm quite happy to acknowledge that to troll someone's stories is silly act of spite and cowardice. I'm slightly less swift to point out that obsessing and whining over trolls is a futile and tedious act, but only because I've said it so damned often that people pelt tomatoes at me when I do. They aren't even nice, ripe tomatoes either. I could eat those.

As for your "club," see the above. Your welcome has been suited to your manners, and all of the carping in the world won't change that a whit. Possibly you might try some other tool, and see how that works.

 

[Recidiva]

Diva,

Can I kiss you, huggle you and plain worship you?

Yes, please!

 

[sr71plt]

There you go. No need to say more.

 

[Recidiva]

There you go. No need to say more.

Right, because it's always everyone else's fault for coming to the same conclusion.

 

[MarshAlien]

[size=+4]

NOW JUST STOP IT!!!​

[/size]

Now, who has some more feedback they'd like to share? Thanks, btw, lindiana.