maybe this is an american thing...

Hallowed Eve said:
:kiss: :kiss: :kiss:


And, with that, hijack is over!

Darn....well, I can take consolation in a new story idea.....a leprechaun....he oftens fucks women who mistakenly think that they'll get his pot of gold....the ultimate "Sugar Daddy" situation.....what they don't know is that he has invested his pot of gold in stocks, bonds, real estate, and other such means of diversifying his assets.....and he's not about to enlighten them...figuring how else can a leprechaun hope to get laid...but then....perhaps...he finds a girl who wants not his money, but the chance to fuck a leprechaun....she can't get enough of his magical cock....and he is so pleased at her strange fetish that he is not about to kick her out of bed....even though he worries at times about being smothered by her lovely, but large 6 feet, 250 lb. body... :D :devil:

Hey, the size disparity just begged to be mentioned or suggested...
 
SEVERUSMAX said:
Darn....well, I can take consolation in a new story idea.....a leprechaun....he oftens fucks women who mistakenly think that they'll get his pot of gold.... ...
Are leprechauns cut or uncut?

As someone said, "That is the question."
 
I'm glad some of us have had fun with this idea, and that two of us in particular are enjoying playful banter ;-)

Perhaps this idea isn't as appealing on a larger scale than a few of us who have a love for the natural penis, and the fun that can be had with that them in a story.

Any authors have ideas to take this in a direction that we might not have considered?

<hoping some new ideas may pop into our little thread..>
 
Honestly I don't think it's not popular, I think more that people don't care if their lover was circumized or not, and frankly, men don't care so long as there are many references to cock pussy and pumping. :nana:

Now as for new idea's, i have one.

We have a young woman who just lost her boyfriend, he broke up with her. He took her virginity and is circumsized. Missing the sex and wanting more, she finds a new guy fairly quickly, and gets him in on top of her. There she finds that he is not circumsized and really enjoys the extra skin moving in and out of her.

I know kinda simple, though I am sure it would get lots of readers, simple wham bam we're having sex stories tend to do the best. ;)
 
bushy_chrissy said:
Perhaps this idea isn't as appealing on a larger scale than a few of us who have a love for the natural penis, and the fun that can be had with that them in a story.

Frankly, I don't know if there is "more fun to be had" with an uncut guy. I've enjoyed the visual, but don't really remember feeling more sensation myself because of the extra skin. The very few (heck, maybe it was only two, I don't really remember anymore) uncut men I've been with, and men I've simply chatted with online, did say they had more sensation due to being intact though.

I'm not quite sure if this would be a "fetish" tale, or just a "regular" one so to speak, but it seems the underlining theme of the story would be the man's added pleasure if not the "surprise" or "visual enjoyment" of the woman.


It's something I could easily add into a tale at some point, but if you're "waiting" on me to do it, don't. At the beginning of the year, I really didn't have plans to write a lot at Lit during 2007. Recently I found myself motivated to start a chain story series with other authors here, and there is a chance that I'll write the final chapter to it which would leave me busy again soon enough.
 
I count myself fortunate for being uncut (I'm from Canada, where circumcision rates are lower), and though I must say I enjoy having it, I can't really say if there's a difference (because I still have my foreskin, thus no frame of reference).

I have read in many places, though, that as well as being more sensitive due to the covering, like Hallowed Eve mentioned, the act of circumcision also reduces sensitivity in two ways. In the first, the foreskin itself has a noteworthy number of nerve-endings, and in the second, the act of removing the foreskin kills the sensitivity in many nerve-endings in the area where the cut is made. That is, it reduces sensitivity on the shaft at the base of the head.

But, like I said, I don't know if it makes that big a difference, as I haven't experience sex from the other side. Or, for that matter, from the woman's perspective.
 
So, I'm not familiar with how foreskins work with sex, but once a guy is completely erect, is there much difference between a trimmed cock and an untrimmed one for the person on the receiving end? From what I gather, the foreskin is pulled back during erection anyhow.
 
Depends on the guy, I've seen guys in porn who are uncut and you never really see their head, and i have seen guys who are uncut that you can't really tell when they get hard besides a little thicker behind the head.

I've never had an uncut like the guy I mention in porn, though I can't see how a woman would like that better. The skin sorta stays in place while he pumps I guess. I suppose if you are really sensitive a uncut guy like that would be a godsend, otherwise, I don't see how a woman could prefer that.

Course I may change my mind if I have an uncut guy in me with all that extra skin, but really I don't see it being better for anyone besides the guy and a super sensitive gal. ;)
 
bushy_chrissy said:
I
Luckily US circumcision rates are dropping off very fast, 80% in 1990 and only 50% nowadays. Perhaps this whole fantasy/idea will be irrelevant in about 20 years if we're lucky.

Did anyone cover this already? A recent study has shown that a circumsised man is less likely to get AIDS. I think those rates are going to reverse themselves.
 
Evil Kirk said:
Did anyone cover this already? A recent study has shown that a circumsised man is less likely to get AIDS. I think those rates are going to reverse themselves.

Yes I've read the reports, and I highly encourage anyone reading this to go look at the actual study, not the MEDIA REPORTS of the study. The actual study was VERY poorly done, with a lot of holes in it. I'll try to pull up some links when time allows.

A key point for thought... if circumcision is a huge factor in transmission of AIDS... why does the US (with a very high circ rate) have such a high AIDS rate when compared with England, Canada, etc (with very LOW circ rates). As almost any reputable doctor/scientist/sexual expert will tell you, BEHAVIOR is the driving factor in AIDS transmission. (acts, condom usage, etc)


But again, this is a debate not to be had here, perhaps better on a how to board. The focus on this thread is how to make the natural intact penis an integral part of a wonderful erotic story. Let's try to keep that focus? Debating the rightness/wrongness of circumcision won't help us enjoy a work of erotic fiction. :)
 
Don't worry about him, Chrissy. If you look at other posts by him, you'll see Evil Kirk is little more than a troll on Lit. :rolleyes:


It's amazing at how the risk of AIDS can be reduced with safer sex practices as well as monogamy or a "safe circle" of FWB. :rolleyes:
 
Hallowed Eve said:
Don't worry about him, Chrissy. If you look at other posts by him, you'll see Evil Kirk is little more than a troll on Lit. :rolleyes:


It's amazing at how the risk of AIDS can be reduced with safer sex practices as well as monogamy or a "safe circle" of FWB. :rolleyes:

I'll be sure to take note of that. :)
 
Hallowed Eve said:
Don't worry about him, Chrissy. If you look at other posts by him, you'll see Evil Kirk is little more than a troll on Lit. :rolleyes:


It's amazing at how the risk of AIDS can be reduced with safer sex practices as well as monogamy or a "safe circle" of FWB. :rolleyes:

I'll take door number three....the FWBs.... :D
 
Texguy84 said:
So, I'm not familiar with how foreskins work with sex, but once a guy is completely erect, is there much difference between a trimmed cock and an untrimmed one for the person on the receiving end? From what I gather, the foreskin is pulled back during erection anyhow.

The foreskin is most often pulled back during erection, but every man experiences this to a different extent. Sometimes the whole glans is revealed, sometimes only part, and sometimes not at all. Everyone has a different ammount of foreskin that is natural for their body.

Bringing it back to erotic stories, perhaps we can have a character who becomes fascinated with intact men, and makes it her goal to find a guy with the longest foreskin? Could be interesting...
 
Hallowed Eve said:
Frankly, I don't know if there is "more fun to be had" with an uncut guy. I've enjoyed the visual, but don't really remember feeling more sensation myself because of the extra skin. The very few (heck, maybe it was only two, I don't really remember anymore) uncut men I've been with, and men I've simply chatted with online, did say they had more sensation due to being intact though.

I'm not quite sure if this would be a "fetish" tale, or just a "regular" one so to speak, but it seems the underlining theme of the story would be the man's added pleasure if not the "surprise" or "visual enjoyment" of the woman.

I thing every woman would describe this different, depending on their experiences. Some of us have had very poor intereactions with the 'cut' variety of penis. Without the foreskin present, each and every 'out stroke' of intercourse literally pulls moisture out of the woman's body, and that makes sex tough for many of us gals. Add to that the fact that most 'cut' guys tend to have a head that is more 'dried out' and a bit rougher... its a very different experience so to speak.
Again, not saying that EVERYONE experiences this... but many of us do. Being with a circumcised guy for me has always meant extra lube, and I hate needing that. Being with an intact guy doesn't require that, because he isn't constantly pulling moisture from within me. A natural guy's tip is also softer, smoother, and feels VERY different inside of me.
Any other girls experience this and willing to share?

In the context of an erotic story, these differences and new feelings could be what opens up a new sexual world for a lead character. She was used to 'circumcised sex' that was uncomfortable, needed extra lube, and became a 'chore.' Being with her first intact guy would wipe that out, and she'd begin to explore her natural sexuality with much more freedom.

This doesn't discount the 'visual enjoyment' that you mentioned, but I think it is important not to limit it only to visual differences.
 
emap said:
I've never had an uncut like the guy I mention in porn, though I can't see how a woman would like that better. The skin sorta stays in place while he pumps I guess. I suppose if you are really sensitive a uncut guy like that would be a godsend, otherwise, I don't see how a woman could prefer that.

Course I may change my mind if I have an uncut guy in me with all that extra skin, but really I don't see it being better for anyone besides the guy and a super sensitive gal. ;)


This may be the best way to share... If you can picture this from a girl's point of view, imagine you had two options:

1) Being penetrated and 'pumped' with a soft, velvety, smooth penis. Upon entry you feel some 'extra warmth' and upon withdrawl you feel the glans withdraw into the man's foreskin. This process repeats, but because of the presence of foreskin, the ridge of his glans isn't constantly pulling moisture out of your body. Instead, moisture is kept inside, and the glans touches you directly sometimes, and massages your walls indirectly through his foreskin. You are able to concentrate on the wonderful feelings being created, and 'get lost in the moment.'

2) Being penetrated and 'pumped' with a penis whose skin is drier and rougher. Upon entry, your lubrication helps this a bit and it feels better. Upon withdrawl, the flared edge of his glans actually and literally PULLS moisture out of you, towards the entrance of your vagina. Repeat, and repeat, and repeat. Unless you are a woman with an endless supply of natural vaginal lubrication... you begin to get that 'dried out' feeling, that is'nt pleasant for EITHER partner. Then imagine either breaking the mood to stop and ask him to get lubricant, or biting your bottom lip and hoping that the uncomfortable feeling ends soon by him ejaculating. Then imagine thinking that this is 'just how sex is,' and can't be another way. Thats who many women who have only experience circumcised sex live their sexual lives.


Something to think about from a woman's point of view.
 
Holding breath to see what kind of response Chrissy's last few posts will get.

If it matters, I'm with you Chrissy, and find this whole them fascinating. I'll continue watching it closely.
 
bushy_chrissy, I'm circumsized, and I dunno how velvety smooth an uncircumsized cock would be, but I'm not sure I'd exactly describe my cock as having all the caressing qualities of sand paper. :D
 
Texguy84 said:
bushy_chrissy, I'm circumsized, and I dunno how velvety smooth an uncircumsized cock would be, but I'm not sure I'd exactly describe my cock as having all the caressing qualities of sand paper. :D


My intent wasn't to be a personal attack on any circumcised guy, I'm sorry if it came accross that way Tex. Not every circ'd guy has a dried out glans. Many, sadly, do.

Here's 2 photo comparisons to look at that show how the two can differ in texture:
http://www.circumstitions.com/Restric/Images/Comparison/glans-i-c.jpg
http://www.circumstitions.com/Restric/Images/Comparison/fren3-4.jpg


Again, I'm sorry if we are getting away from the erotic story aspect of this thread... perhaps we can return to that discussion?

Anyone else have new story ideas about this topic?
 
Back
Top