Oral Servitude

[rosco rathbone]

outdoors in bedrock.

Why do I have the feeling that this one is taking place near a ren faire? Maybe out behind the jousting fields.

The orange hood is rather comical.

I like the clinical way that the guy in chain-mail is squeezing the balls. I can really see myself getting into something like that. It's sort of homosexual, I know. It looks like he's trying to milk more seed out of them.

 

[shy slave]

Why do I have the feeling that this one is taking place near a ren faire? Maybe out behind the jousting fields.

The orange hood is rather comical.

I like the clinical way that the guy in chain-mail is squeezing the balls. I can really see myself getting into something like that. It's sort of homosexual, I know. It looks like he's trying to milk more seed out of them.

You sure thats a guy in chain mail, the hand looks female and the edges of material that can be seen are pink/magenta sort of colour.

I thought it was a woman, although not sure women wore chain mail.

 

[Blushing Bottom]

Recall sweet Joan...among others.

I agree, they are the hands of a woman.

You sure thats a guy in chain mail, the hand looks female and the edges of material that can be seen are pink/magenta sort of colour.

I thought it was a woman, although not sure women wore chain mail.

 

[Marquis]

I thought it was a female too, which of course makes Rosco that much more homo.

 

[shy slave]

Recall sweet Joan...among others.

I agree, they are the hands of a woman.

As I recall Joan was into extreme fire play.

Thanks for the reminder BB

 

[Shagly]

As I recall Joan was into extreme fire play.

Thanks for the reminder BB

Joan of Ark?

 

[alice_underneath]

http://uploadany.com/imagehost/out.php/i11358_suckgran.jpg

Stirbird,

Thank you very much for posting this photo.

She appears to be older than I am (45). I don't how old you are, Stirbird, so maybe you won't understand yet why this photo made my day. But I appreciate it so much when older women are portrayed as passionate, sexy, desirable creatures.

I think this woman is fantastic, and I thank you again for putting her on this Board.

Alice

 

[stirbird]

Stirbird,

Thank you very much for posting this photo.

She appears to be older than I am (45). I don't how old you are, Stirbird, so maybe you won't understand yet why this photo made my day. But I appreciate it so much when older women are portrayed as passionate, sexy, desirable creatures.

I think this woman is fantastic, and I thank you again for putting her on this Board.

Alice

You and RR both like this one. I am surprised! There are other older women cocksucking pics in this long thread if I remember correctly. One other poster (besides you two) liked them a lot and was always requsting them.

 

[stirbird]

I thought it was a female too, which of course makes Rosco that much more homo.

All right, I'll answer the question about this picture. It's a promo pic from a website called "girlknights.com." They specialize in an obscure costume-sex niche: girls dressed up in male medieaval knight costumes (albeit hokey ones). Lots of the galleries have a bdsm twist, which is how I happened upon them. Here's another girlkinght gallery, pretty vanilla, but you can see the costuming:

http://www.pornofrost.com/free/girlknights0110/porno_gallery2.html

 

[alice_underneath]

You and RR both like this one. I am surprised! There are other older women cocksucking pics in this long thread if I remember correctly. One other poster (besides you two) liked them a lot and was always requsting them.

It isn't so much what she's doing... although that certainly looks like fun!

The woman looks real to me - beautiful, but real. I see her as a role model of sorts.

I can imagine myself being her in ten years. I want to be her in ten years.

She is such an exquisite contrast to the stereotype of older women that pervades our society.

*shrugs* That's the best way I can think of to describe my reaction to the photo.

Alice

 

[stirbird]

It isn't so much what she's doing... although that certainly looks like fun!

The woman looks real to me - beautiful, but real. I see her as a role model of sorts.

I can imagine myself being her in ten years. I want to be her in ten years.

She is such an exquisite contrast to the stereotype of older women that pervades our society.

*shrugs* That's the best way I can think of to describe my reaction to the photo.

Alice

True, she's not your conventional "mature" pornstar. A lot of men fetishize the uglier aspects of women growing old (the sterotype you mention), so the mature niche (not milf, we're talking way beyong milf) plays up to that. It is pretty depressing, I agree. I'm pretty sure this is an amateur pic, not a professional porn niche image. She's just some lucky guy's woman.

 

[rosco rathbone]

True, she's not your conventional "mature" pornstar. A lot of men fetishize the uglier aspects of women growing old (the sterotype you mention), so the mature niche (not milf, we're talking way beyong milf) plays up to that. It is pretty depressing, I agree. I'm pretty sure this is an amateur pic, not a professional porn niche image. She's just some lucky guy's woman.

Who knew that the tomboy/pixi could be so hot on an old lady

 

[Shagly]

http://www.a-reviews.com/_tgp/062905-betty-oral/pics/photo016.jpg

 

[rosco rathbone]

I've always felt oral to be an act of mastery. Recieving oral, I am boss. I do not do oral. Apparently, the ancient romans felt the same, which does not surprise me.

from wiki:

In pre-Christian ancient Rome sexual acts were generally seen through the prism of submission and control. This is apparent in the two Latin words for the act: irrumare (to penetrate orally), and fellare (to be penetrated orally). Under this system, it was considered to be abhorrent for a male to be in any way penetrated (be controlled) by another person of lower social standing during sex.

This same logic also allowed a man to receive fellatio from a woman or another man of lower social status (such as a slave or debtor), because the man would be directing the actions of the person of lower rank. The Romans regarded oral sex as being far more shameful than, for example, anal sex — known practitioners were supposed to have foul breath and were often unwelcome as guests at a dinner table. The women of Lesbos were believed to have introduced the practice of fellatio, and it is said that they used to whiten their lips as though with semen.

So, whereas in Greece, where there was a tendency to see the person "performing" oral sex as active and the "receiving" party as passive, in Roman times fellatio and cunnilingus were perceived to be a passive and therefore shameful act for any man to perform, and oral sex between members of low social standing groups was considered superfluous and was often viewed as taboo. Therefore performing any type of oral sex was considered to be a passive (as in submissive) act while receiving oral sex was viewed as an active (as in controlling) act. [2] The practice was taboo for public health reasons, as well. In Rome, the genitals were considered to be unclean. Oral sex was thought to make the mouth dirty, and (ultimately) to present a public health risk.

 

[Blushing Bottom]

I like your logic...
...and your av.

I've always felt oral to be an act of mastery. Recieving oral, I am boss. I do not do oral. Apparently, the ancient romans felt the same, which does not surprise me.

from wiki:

In pre-Christian ancient Rome sexual acts were generally seen through the prism of submission and control. This is apparent in the two Latin words for the act: irrumare (to penetrate orally), and fellare (to be penetrated orally). Under this system, it was considered to be abhorrent for a male to be in any way penetrated (be controlled) by another person of lower social standing during sex.

This same logic also allowed a man to receive fellatio from a woman or another man of lower social status (such as a slave or debtor), because the man would be directing the actions of the person of lower rank. The Romans regarded oral sex as being far more shameful than, for example, anal sex — known practitioners were supposed to have foul breath and were often unwelcome as guests at a dinner table. The women of Lesbos were believed to have introduced the practice of fellatio, and it is said that they used to whiten their lips as though with semen.

So, whereas in Greece, where there was a tendency to see the person "performing" oral sex as active and the "receiving" party as passive, in Roman times fellatio and cunnilingus were perceived to be a passive and therefore shameful act for any man to perform, and oral sex between members of low social standing groups was considered superfluous and was often viewed as taboo. Therefore performing any type of oral sex was considered to be a passive (as in submissive) act while receiving oral sex was viewed as an active (as in controlling) act. [2] The practice was taboo for public health reasons, as well. In Rome, the genitals were considered to be unclean. Oral sex was thought to make the mouth dirty, and (ultimately) to present a public health risk.

 

[alice_underneath]

I do not do oral.

Such shameless self-promotion, Mr. Rathbone!

 

[alice_underneath]

Therefore performing any type of oral sex was considered to be a passive (as in submissive) act while receiving oral sex was viewed as an active (as in controlling) act.

As you may already know, there is a thread in which this issue is debated:

Travelin' South - The Dominant Kiss?

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=224387&page=1&pp=25

My personal opinion is that the giver is in a far more controlling position than the receiver.

But that probably says more about my range of personal experience than anything else.

Alice

 

[Marquis]

As you may already know, there is a thread in which this issue is debated:

Travelin' South - The Dominant Kiss?

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=224387&page=1&pp=25

My personal opinion is that the giver is in a far more controlling position than the receiver.

But that probably says more about my range of personal experience than anything else.

Alice

There was a sub who tried to sell me on this position once.

"What?! You don't eat pussy? But it's so dominant!"

Whoever is promoting this idea needs to be shot.

 

[alice_underneath]

There was a sub who tried to sell me on this position once.

"What?! You don't eat pussy? But it's so dominant!"

Whoever is promoting this idea needs to be shot.

https://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=15375158&postcount=66

 

[Marquis]

https://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=15375158&postcount=66

Oh lord.

 

[Shagly]

Oh my!

I should have been a missionary.

 

[Kajira Callista]

There was a sub who tried to sell me on this position once.

"What?! You don't eat pussy? But it's so dominant!"

Whoever is promoting this idea needs to be shot.

lol

 

[rosco rathbone]

Whoever is promoting this idea needs to be shot.

Yes, there's a lot of this nonsense going around.

 

[Kajira Callista]

Yes, there's a lot of this nonsense going around.

lol

 

[shy slave]

As you may already know, there is a thread in which this issue is debated:

Travelin' South - The Dominant Kiss?

https://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=224387&page=1&pp=25

My personal opinion is that the giver is in a far more controlling position than the receiver.

But that probably says more about my range of personal experience than anything else.

Alice

It sounds like your experiences are spot on Alice.

Although most men are so willing to put their cock in any mouth they rarely realise what a risk they are taking.

Perhaps oral should be the ultimate definition of 'toppoing from the bottom'