Bramblethorn
Sleep-deprived
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2012
- Posts
- 19,052
Ken Kesey's "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" is an example where, IMHO, present tense works fine:
It reminds me of a passage in Kingfisher's "What Feasts At Night":
IME, present tense can be an excellent way of evoking that kind of immediacy. Things that are in the past but experienced as if they're still happening. Kesey's narrator may no longer be in the psychiatric ward but he's going to carry it with him in his head.
(Kingfisher doesn't actually use present tense that way, or not that I can recall; the war slip-over sequences in that book are in past tense same as most of the other narrative. It just seemed like a good quote for explaining that timelessness.)
Present tense isn't my default writing mode and I would generally prefer past tense unless the writer has some specific reason for present. I don't think I have any stories here that are written primarily in present. (Occasional passages, yes, for one reason or another.)
But it's not something that causes me a lot of discomfort and I probably won't even remember the author's tense choices a few months after reading.
I’m mopping near the ward door when a key hits it from the other side and I know it’s the Big Nurse by the way the lockworks cleave to the key, soft and swift and familiar she been around locks so long. She slides through the door with a gust of cold and locks the door behind her and I see her fingers trail across the polished steel – tip of each finger the same color as her lips. Funny orange. Like the tip of a soldering iron. Color so hot or so cold if she touches you with it you can’t tell which.
It reminds me of a passage in Kingfisher's "What Feasts At Night":
I sometimes think the fundamental disconnect with civilians is that they think a war is an event, something neatly bounded on either end by dates. What anyone who's lived through one can tell you is that it's actually a place. You're there and then you leave, but places don't stop existing just because you aren't looking at them. The war's still there. I don't live in it anymore, but it's right over there, just on the other side of...I don't know. Something. ... And sometimes, for a little while, I slip over into that other place. The war.
IME, present tense can be an excellent way of evoking that kind of immediacy. Things that are in the past but experienced as if they're still happening. Kesey's narrator may no longer be in the psychiatric ward but he's going to carry it with him in his head.
(Kingfisher doesn't actually use present tense that way, or not that I can recall; the war slip-over sequences in that book are in past tense same as most of the other narrative. It just seemed like a good quote for explaining that timelessness.)
Present tense isn't my default writing mode and I would generally prefer past tense unless the writer has some specific reason for present. I don't think I have any stories here that are written primarily in present. (Occasional passages, yes, for one reason or another.)
But it's not something that causes me a lot of discomfort and I probably won't even remember the author's tense choices a few months after reading.