MillieDynamite
Millie'sVastExpanse
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2021
- Posts
- 11,521
Well, now that tore it. Hum, don't sound right, do it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I remember my English teacher being absolutely adamant that "now" was never appropriate in fiction, which was set in the past. (He probably wouldn't admit that present tense narrative existed, and he loathed e e cummings with the passion of a thousand suns, so it may be fair to say he was very traditional.) Also, today, yesterday, or any other present-relative terms are verboten.While I am quite grateful to the volunteer editor I work with for having been so supportive along my journey, he and I do still have a bit of an ongoing friendly debate. Namely: Is the word 'now' acceptable to use in narratives presented in past tense?
For example, in a sentence such as:
or:
He contends that it means 'the present moment', which a past-tense narrative certainly is not.
I argue that it has two meanings, the first being 'the present moment', and the second, 'a circumstance different from a prior one'.
Now, I have a friend who has suggested that all writers have a series of literary 'tics', as it were, subconscious patterns they end up overusing, and that 'now' might be one of mine. (I also just realized how this paragraph started, so I think my friend may be right.) Anyway, my friend thinks it might benefit me to treat 'now' as, at the very least, an indication that a sentence could use some closer attention.
The fact remains, though, that I don't see anything inherently wrong with using the 'circumstance' definition, even in past tense, and there are just some sentences where trying to avoid using it entirely leads to some (in my opinion) very awkward presentation. My editor insists on reminding me on every story I send him anyway.
So... who's right?