Replies from trolls who are passive aggressive.

[SmilingLez]

She hasn’t said as much here, but @Erozetta posted screen shots from Reddit where she was saying that she was using AI to write a novel. I hope I’m not misrepresenting the situation, this is just based on what I saw.

To answer the question she asks, if you get AI to fill in the blanks between your original plot arc and beats, what you get is no longer your work. It’s also the work of all the authors whose stories were used without permission to train the LLM.

You end up having to acknowledge more people that @PennyThompson .

@EmilyMiller Please provide a link to the so-called screenshots. TIA. If you accuse someone of doing something at least show your proof. I would like to know if I am defending the wrong person.

 

[EmilyMiller]

what's going get me banned.

Enough already with the banned. It’s beginning to seem like this is what you want to happen. People do a lot worse shit here than anything you’ve done and get no consequences.

 

[EmilyMiller]

@EmilyMiller Please provide a link to the so-called screenshots. TIA. If you accuse someone of doing something at least show your proof. I would like to know if I am defending the wrong person.

Sure - let me do so.

 

[SmilingLez]

Sure - let me do so.

Thank you. I have no problem admitting that I am wrong but want to make sure

 

[EmilyMiller]

they seem to be the better person to answer that question because apparently me calling them out on their hypocrisy is what's going get me banned.

Reply was intended for @SmilingLez - I messed that up

OK - @Erozetta did two things:

1. Here she referred to the OPs subscriptions to and history on two Reddit threads dedicated to AI writing

2. Here she posted some screenshots from Reddit (I assume the group @Erozetta mentioned - but maybe she can clarify - hard to read on a phone) - on closer scrutiny my context-based assumption that they related to specifically the OP seems off (again perhaps @Erozetta can clarify). I’m happy to amend my text should this prove to be the case.

As I said, I’m basing my current (and influencable) views on a) what @Erozetta said (I’m not on Reddit) b) the way the OP has not answered direct questions and c) used formulations like: the plot arc and beats are mine.

If she would unequivocally deny she is using AI to aid her writing, I would believe her.

 

[Andreas_Kreuz]

Why don't we simply ask @Lolita30 : Is the story Starfucked completely your own wording or is it '... [your] original plot arcs and beats' then written out by AI?

 

[alohadave]

So is this Tilan's new account or JohnSmith321 (or whatever the name was)?

 

[StillStunned]

So is this Tilan's new account or JohnSmith321 (or whatever the name was)?

I have to admit, the constant complaints about being banned did put me in mind of JohnSmith.

 

[SmilingLez]

Reply was intended for @SmilingLez - I messed that up

OK - @Erozetta did two things:

1. Here she referred to the OPs subscriptions to and history on two Reddit threads dedicated to AI writing

2. Here she posted some screenshots from Reddit (I assume the group @Erozetta mentioned - but maybe she can clarify - hard to read on a phone) - on closer scrutiny my context-based assumption that they related to specifically the OP seems off (again perhaps @Erozetta can clarify). I’m happy to amend my text should this prove to be the case.

As I said, I’m basing my current (and influencable) views on a) what @Erozetta said (I’m not on Reddit) b) the way the OP has not answered direct questions and c) used formulations like: the plot arc and beats are mine.

If she would unequivocally deny she is using AI to aid her writing, I would believe her.

FUCK.

Thank you @EmilyMiller for that information. Puts a different spin on things.

I am very anti AI when it comes to creativity, and this just pisses me off

 

[KittyOfSteele]

Why don't we simply ask @Lolita30 : Is the story Starfucked completely your own wording or is it '... [your] original plot arcs and beats' then written out by AI?

Ok, this got me curious. I write in Markdown notation on both Obsidian, Ghostwriter, and even in my handwritten notes, and I've never seen a story using full Markdown notation posted here since there's no Markdown support on Literotica. AI detectors are crap, but what the hell, I decided to run it on GPTZero because it got me thinking, so once again, FULL TABLESPOON of pink Himalayan salt please...

95% AI.

I don't know what Lit uses to detect AI work, but man, I just cringe when I see raw Markdown like that. I'm used to it, it's confortable for me, but unprocessed it in a post, oh dear, it is annoying for anyone who isn't used to see the pounds and the asterisks written instead of in their mind's eye.

 

[SmilingLez]

Why don't we simply ask @Lolita30 : Is the story Starfucked completely your own wording or is it '... [your] original plot arcs and beats' then written out by AI?

I wouldn't be surprised if the story was AI generated because of the comments on how an AI generates a story, by authors in this forum. Lots of repeating stylistic tics, use of over the top punctuation, and of course the lists of three (damn I just did a list of three with an Oxford comma. Hope no one thinks I am AI generated)

 

[EmilyMiller]

FUCK.

Thank you @EmilyMiller for that information. Puts a different spin on things.

I am very anti AI when it comes to creativity, and this just pisses me off

I’m not trying to cause problems for anyone. I wrote to the OP earlier and asked if they wanted to talk. I don’t think using AI makes you evil - even claiming it as your own isn’t evil. But it does make me sad.

But something about this thread seems a little off. Don’t know what precisely

 

[EmilyMiller]

a list of three with an Oxford comma

Most stories I have published here have the above over and over and over again.

 

[onehitwanda]

But something about this thread seems a little off. Don’t know what precisely

Meep Morp @StillStunned

 

[MelissaBaby]

But something about this thread seems a little off. Don’t know what precisely

Not enough Raylan.

 

[forgotmyantidepressants]

But something about this thread seems a little off. Don’t know what precisely

Are the robots fucking with us?! jk

 

[KittyOfSteele]

Are the robots fucking with us?! jk

Not until they start putting dicks and pussies in them.

 

[forgotmyantidepressants]

If someone got an AI-generated story through that wretched filter and then came here and trolled us all... honestly, I tip my hat to you. That is some A+ trolling.

But in all seriousness, that would be a pretty significant development.

 

[CalBishForNow]

People complain a lot about false positives in the filter. No one would complain about a false negative in the filter except Laurel and Manu, and they'd do it in discreet terms. If someone got a story through the filter and then used it to brag/troll/whatever, I hope they'd be more clever about it than this, but I guess it's possible.

 

[onehitwanda]

But in all seriousness, that would be a pretty significant development.

Would it really, though? No system is infallible.

 

[puppett]

Don't you think it's a cop out to change your voice in order to get a story posted? Is having a story go live more important than being true to yourself?

IMO, integrity and authenticity are far more important than simple math. Of course, YMMV

can you ask ai to make the story less ai?

 

[SmilingLez]

People complain a lot about false positives in the filter. No one would complain about a false negative in the filter except Laurel and Manu, and they'd do it in discreet terms. If someone got a story through the filter and then used it to brag/troll/whatever, I hope they'd be more clever about it than this, but I guess it's possible.

I for one would like to see that reaction. Karma, in a way - it would make up for all the people who didn't use AI to write their stories and got rejected anyway

 

[SmilingLez]

can you ask ai to make the story less ai?

I don't think a user can override hard code and algorithms. I abhor AIs and don't use them. I prefer to manually search for restaurants v asking an AI for suggestions

 

[puppett]

I don't think a user can override the code and algorithms

i mean isnt ai all great now? could you use the new ai to say hey make this story less likely to get flagged by ai?

 

[forgotmyantidepressants]

Would it really, though? No system is infallible.

The system would be a total failure. False positives are one thing. Annoying, but honestly worth the headache if it keeps AI stories out. But if it can't even AI out, then why put up with all the hassle?