So according to rush limbaugh, the republican party stands for...

[richard_daily]

"Viable" or not, I think the argument centers around what the mother does with the "other" body. You know. The one that's not actually hers.

until the baby is viable, there is no other body... it's a microbe, or a growth. The only difference is it's potential... I don't see you worrying about spilt sperm, or a woman flushing her period down the toilet...

Once that other "body" can live on it's own, you may have a valid argument... until that point, it's none of your business.

 

[richard_daily]

Careful there, yer painting with a pretty big brush.

I am Republican. And I am pro-choice.

Rush is entitled to his opinion, as is everyone else, but that doesn't necessarily make it true.

And yet notice how the majority of the republicans still fall in line under this very issue? I hate to admit it, but it looks like rush is right on this one...

First time for everything.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

until the baby is viable, there is no other body...

You're the one that made the distinction about "relying on it's mother's body." I just picked up on that.

Guess it was a slip of the keyboard, eh?

 

[busybody..]

Go ahead DICK DAILY

Tell me

Didnt Peterson get CONVICTED of KILLING 2????????????

Based on the long C n P

Didnt BAM vote to KILL BABIES?


Is that the PROGRESSIVE and DUMOH way?

Or will you still pretend it aint so?

How right I was, DICK DAILY wont answer

Other then scream

LIAR!


As if to say, Peterson didnt get convicted of TWO KILLINGS, ONE A FETUS

and BAM didnt vote for KILLING LIVE BABIES!

 

[richard_daily]

You're the one that made the distinction about "relying on it's mother's body." I just picked up on that.

Guess it was a slip of the keyboard, eh?

Which part of "relying on it's mother's body" didn't you understand?

 

[richard_daily]

How right I was, DICK DAILY wont answer

Other then scream

LIAR!


As if to say, Peterson didnt get convicted of TWO KILLINGS, ONE A FETUS

and BAM didnt vote for KILLING LIVE BABIES!

post links.

 

[busybody..]

post links.

The 2nd one is ALL OVER the news the past 3 days

the Peterson story is so well known even YOU can not pretend not to have heard of it.


ADMIT IT

You are proud your IDEALS and VALUES are to KILL BABIES!

 

[busybody..]

oh darling - governments have been killing babies for centuries. And I'm sure if you look hard enough you can find some simply horrific stories of botched abortions. Does not change the truth though... sadly enough.

WHAT COUNTRIES?

 

[richard_daily]

The 2nd one is ALL OVER the news the past 3 days

the Peterson story is so well known even YOU can not pretend not to have heard of it.


ADMIT IT

You are proud your IDEALS and VALUES are to KILL BABIES!

So you can't back it up with links is what you're saying...

 

[busybody..]

Yes

The Peterson conviction for TWO killings never happened


and THE LIVE BIRTH ISSUE is NOT all over the news

and the BAM campaign DIDNT say that YES, BAM voted for the right for hospitals to put LIVE BABIES that survived abortions in a cloet to die

this after BAM SAID THOSE THAT SAID HE VOTED FOR IT WERE LIARS

Pretend it aint so

 

[busybody..]

Scott Peterson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For the staff writer for the Christian Science Monitor, see Scott Peterson (writer).
Scott Peterson
Born 24 October 1972 (1972-10-24) (age 35)

Spouse(s) Laci Peterson (1997-2002)
Parents Jacqueline Helen Latham and Lee Arthur Peterson
Scott Lee Peterson (born October 24, 1972) is an American man in California who was convicted of the murder of his wife, Laci Peterson, who was eight months pregnant at the time, and their unborn son, Conner. Peterson's case dominated the American media for many months.

In 2005, Peterson was sentenced to death by lethal injection. As of 2008, he remains on death row in San Quentin State Prison while his case is on appeal to the Supreme Court of California. He maintains his innocence.

 

[busybody..]

Since YOU, DICK DAILY and your PROGRESSIVES and LIBZ love ABORTION

had LACI wanted to abort the kid

and the KID survived, and been born

The LIVE BIRTH ACT, that BAM voted for


The KID would have been THROWN in a closet to DIE and doctors would have been forbidden to help

ITS A CHOICE, RIGHT DICK DAILY?


Pretend I'M A LIAR AND MADE IT ALL UP!

 

[richard_daily]

Scott Peterson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For the staff writer for the Christian Science Monitor, see Scott Peterson (writer).
Scott Peterson
Born 24 October 1972 (1972-10-24) (age 35)

Spouse(s) Laci Peterson (1997-2002)
Parents Jacqueline Helen Latham and Lee Arthur Peterson
Scott Lee Peterson (born October 24, 1972) is an American man in California who was convicted of the murder of his wife, Laci Peterson, who was eight months pregnant at the time, and their unborn son, Conner. Peterson's case dominated the American media for many months.

In 2005, Peterson was sentenced to death by lethal injection. As of 2008, he remains on death row in San Quentin State Prison while his case is on appeal to the Supreme Court of California. He maintains his innocence.

And where does it state that he was convicted for two murders?

Oh wait... it doesn't.

But don't let the facts stop you from your ranting.

 

[busybody..]

And where does it state that he was convicted for two murders?

Oh wait... it doesn't.

But don't let the facts stop you from your ranting.

ott Lee Peterson (born October 24, 1972) is an American man in California who was convicted of the murder of his wife, Laci Peterson, who was eight months pregnant at the time, and their unborn son, Conner. Peterson's case dominated the American media for many months

see the word AND?

are you the ONLY person who doesnt know

or are you really that dumb?

 

[busybody..]

I know, DICK DAILY

that NBC stands for Network of BUSH/CHENEY and THEY lie

But here

NBC News and news services
updated 1:28 a.m. ET, Thurs., March. 17, 2005
REDWOOD CITY, Calif. - A judge on Wednesday sentenced Scott Peterson to die for the murder of his wife and their unborn child, upholding a jury's recommendation and describing the murders as "cruel, uncaring, heartless and callous."

Judge Alfred Delucchi had to decide whether to sentence Peterson to death or give him life in prison without the possibility of parole.

"The court is satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant, Scott Lee Peterson, is guilty of first-degree murder," Delucchi said.




IF ABORTION IS NOT KILLING BABIES, HOW DID HE GET CONVICTED OF TWO MURDERS?

 

[unregistered]

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Which part of "relying on it's mother's body" didn't you understand?

"Mother's body" is a possessive construction. That construction implies direct ownership of the body by the mother separate and distinct from anyone or anything else. As written, the construction specifically excludes ownership of the "body" by the entity known as "IT" (reliance or dependence notwithstanding). I'm simply illustrating how your own words were actually working against you despite your intent.

But that's arguing English grammar, not science.

If you really believe a near term, non-viable fetus is of no greater ethical significance than a soiled tampon based on the lack of viability that is common to both, I have nothing to offer you in the way of rebuttal.

Not because I believe you to be right. I simply cannot imagine that such a conclusion would be vulnerable to mere reason and evidence alone.

 

[busybody..]

I believe the official verdict was 1st degree murder for the death of his wife and 2nd degree murder for the death of his unborn child. Dick doesn't care about being correct only about being a dick daily.

He'll be here soon

saying EIGHT months is different then weeks or 1-2 months

so what he is saying is that

A HUMAN BABY is whatever the LIBZ and DUMZ decide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BUT he will ignore the LIVE BIRTH issue that BAM is involved in

BAM WANTS TO KILL BABIES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Slowlane]

There is no murder, or homocide, as you'd prefer to call it, involved.

Abortion isn't wrong, it isn't amoral, and it isn't a problem for anyone but those who want to tell a woman what she can or cannot do with her body.

So you can't answer the question?

 

[Slowlane]

I don't use the phrase "reproductive freedom" so how the fuck should I know? Ask someone who does.

I use the actual term Abortion. Abort a fetus. That is the procedure and that is what is being done, so why not just simplify the whole word debate and use those terms. If you want to play word games, enjoy.

The question wasn't directed at you. You jumped in on your own now you can't take the heat.

 

[busybody..]

Originally Posted by richard_daily

There is no murder, or homocide, as you'd prefer to call it, involved.

Then how could S Peterson be convicted of the death of his kid?

 

[Slowlane]

Well, as weasle as it is, there's your answer slow. Tumor removal 101.

Ishmael

Seems like you're right.

 

[Slowlane]

until the baby is viable, there is no other body... it's a microbe, or a growth. The only difference is it's potential... I don't see you worrying about spilt sperm, or a woman flushing her period down the toilet...

Once that other "body" can live on it's own, you may have a valid argument... until that point, it's none of your business.

So we should also kill any handicapped that can't feed themselves? Would that be OK as well?

 

[Slowlane]

Just for the record, my question is neither pro nor anti abortion.

 

[phrodeau]

Now that is funny. Busybody wants the entire country to do things the way that they do in California.