The new football thread

So from what I've been reading about this DK Metcalf story,the fan was aggressively stalking him showing up at games.Provoking him,yelling at him,the works trying to get a response from him and apparantly it worked finally.

So now the guy can go for a lawsuit for punching him,what he wanted all along for assault.

So what's the lesson here?Stay silent,walk away,ignore,and don't give the jackass the satisfaction.
 
Uh,they lost because they didn't cover an onside kick? Bears had a 4.7 % chance to recover it that's really just being fortunate.


Usually every year there's a team that gets all the breaks,the bounces,the calls.Last year definitely the Commanders this year CHI.
Dude...they lost because THEY PUT THEMSELVES IN THAT SITUATION.
 
So from what I've been reading about this DK Metcalf story,the fan was aggressively stalking him showing up at games.Provoking him,yelling at him,the works trying to get a response from him and apparantly it worked finally.

So now the guy can go for a lawsuit for punching him,what he wanted all along for assault.

So what's the lesson here?Stay silent,walk away,ignore,and don't give the jackass the satisfaction.
He lost 45 million in next year's guarantees. What it shows is don't be cheap. He couldn't afford security?
 
Dude...they lost because THEY PUT THEMSELVES IN THAT SITUATION.
Dude you're depending on recovering an onside kick to win games? Come on man thats 4 %

To have a 7 point lead under 2 minutes on the road with a backup QB is not a bad deal,just recover the ball.I'd take my chances every week.
 
Dude...they lost because THEY PUT THEMSELVES IN THAT SITUATION.
Seriously!!!!

The Pack lost due to many mistakes. Not having Micha, the cheap shot to take out Love and yes the onside kick was a blunder but to say that the Pack is entitled is just insane ...

Now you've gone and pissed me off!!!!

🤬
 
Back
Top