Trump

[phrodeau]

Would it be a bigger disgrace than electing a known liar and criminal to go around apologizing for America being such a piece of shit and then whoring the country out to the highest bidders?

Not really sure that it would....

Whose kool-aid have you been drinking?

 

[JackLuis]

North Korea praises Trump and urges US voters to reject 'dull Hillary'

Trump endorsed by an"actual" communist!

https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/419fe8d6028fd981a94a12b947758db987ecd1d1/58_36_3380_2029/3380.jpg?w=300&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&

North Korean state media has praised US presidential hopeful Donald Trump, describing him as a “wise politician” and “far-sighted candidate” who could help unify the Korean peninsula.

An editorial in DPRK Today, an official media outlet, welcomed the Republican presidential candidate’s proposal to hold direct talks with Kim Jong-un, saying he could help bring about Pyongyang’s “Yankee go home” policy.
At last a good idea from Donald Trump: dialogue with North Korea
Aidan Foster-Carter
Read more

“There are many positive aspects to Trump’s ‘inflammatory policies’,” wrote Han Yong-mook, who described himself as a Chinese North Korean scholar.

“Trump said he will not get involved in the war between the South and the North, isn’t this fortunate from North Korea’ perspective?”

 

[BotanyBoy]

Whose kool-aid have you been drinking?

You must not know very much about Hillary Clinton......

I know you're probably thinking she's a progressive who's deeply concerned about the working class in America.
http://gifsec.com/wp-content/uploads/GIF/2014/04/Sick-Laugh-GIF.gif?gs=a

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

I think this whole discussion is tawdry and trailer trash talk, which contributes to why good people don't run for public office anymore, but your sentence here struck me as a non sequitur. I don't see how you reached that conclusion from the premise that she's for sale. Can you explain what you mean?

It's not a question to me whether she's for sale. That she took $50,000 to attend Trump's last wedding pretty much settled that. Why would have getting a divorce marked her as for sale?

From the idiot working the day shift to Amber & Johnny, there are people getting divorced every day hat (regardless of both's respective incomes) ask for spousal support, etc... Same amt. of people go on "Maury" & say "Once a cheater, always...".

Frankly, last I checked (it's been years, to be honest) if she wins the election next Fall, she will be our 2nd "President Clinton"... Meaning she's still legally married to someone all legal citizens (including herself, regardless of if they can legally vote or not, let alone who they do so for) know cheated on her at least once. (I think more agree on that than the OJ verdict.)

If she put(s) up with that, why wouldn't her E-mails include some coming from am African person asking for money? It should have, since she didn't get divorced, which means she cares more about staying with a cheater than the largely-financial benefit she stands to get if she separates from him.

Also, regarding other post: Who cares if Trump's a fool?! So is anyone who votes for him!!

 

[phrodeau]

You must not know very much about Hillary Clinton......

I know you're probably thinking she's a progressive who's deeply concerned about the working class in America.
http://gifsec.com/wp-content/uploads/GIF/2014/04/Sick-Laugh-GIF.gif?gs=a

Show me the quotes of politicians apologizing for America. I haven't seen them yet.

 

[sr71plt]

From the idiot working the day shift to Amber & Johnny, there are people getting divorced every day hat (regardless of both's respective incomes) ask for spousal support, etc... Same amt. of people go on "Maury" & say "Once a cheater, always...".

Frankly, last I checked (it's been years, to be honest) if she wins the election next Fall, she will be our 2nd "President Clinton"... Meaning she's still legally married to someone all legal citizens (including herself, regardless of if they can legally vote or not, let alone who they do so for) know cheated on her at least once. (I think more agree on that than the OJ verdict.)

If she put(s) up with that, why wouldn't her E-mails include some coming from am African person asking for money? It should have, since she didn't get divorced, which means she cares more about staying with a cheater than the largely-financial benefit she stands to get if she separates from him.

Also, regarding other post: Who cares if Trump's a fool?! So is anyone who votes for him!!

Umm, OK. I don't see where that answered my question. Frankly I don't see where you are making a lick of sense at all, but that's OK.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Umm, OK. I don't see where that answered my question. Frankly I don't see where you are making a lick of sense at all, but that's OK.

It answered your question & then some. The problem is not what I'm saying or how, but the person "see"ing it.

 

[sr71plt]

No, you didn't parse the meaning of "If she were for sale, she would've divorced her hubby one of the thousand times he cheated."

If she'd asked for a divorce she'd have been far less saleable than she has been by not divorcing him. She would have sunk into oblivion as a discarded spouse. Instead, she's been a U.S. senator and secretary of state and is running for president and titular leader of the Democratic party (jobs she'd been highly unlikely to get support for as a divorced wife of a president who was still a force in the Democratic Party). She wouldn't have benefited from spousal support from a divorce settlement either. Under federal law, she'd get half of his retirement salary from the government--no more, no less. As they've already pointed out they were practically broke at the end of his term, so no fortune to tap in a divorce settlement. And she's a big moneymaker in her own right. The courts wouldn't have given her spousal support. They didn't even have a house in their name for her to get at the time.

Like a lot of your posts, you don't make a whole lot of sense.

And this isn't even getting around to it being highly unlikely that he's cheated on her as many as 1,000 times. You also like to exaggerate a lot. That doesn't make you any different from many posters to the political board, though.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Show me the quotes of politicians apologizing for America. I haven't seen them yet.

You wouldn't unless it had "OFFICIAL US APOLOGY" stamped on the cover.

Shit's all over the internet, you can google like a big boy.


And even if you don't share my opinion my statement still stands....

Both sides have sunk to a new low.

Clinton supporters get ZERO moral high ground over Trump supporters, sorry. She's not like Obama who hadn't had a record of shit.....that misogynistic super predators scum is as thick as the LAPD's and then some.

The only real reason to vote for one over the other is because your wallet or because lemming.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Pretty much what Pilot said. She made a political calculation and the correct one depending on your ambitions. A divorcee Hillary would have had no future in politics. Nobody thinks the two of them are in love anymore if they ever were. We accept that they are a power couple who feed on each other. Truth be told I think the evidence is starting to mount that Hillary was the one who had the real ambition and Bill would have been perfectly happy living a lower 1% life and chasing skirts until he died.

 

[JackLuis]

‘Dump With Trump’ toilet paper is outselling Hillary Clinton toilet paper by 6-to-1

http://2d0yaz2jiom3c6vy7e7e5svk.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/trump-toilet-paper-e1464785714183-300x161.jpg

Donald Trump is the most unpopular major-party presidential candidate in recent American history, so it’s not surprising that sales of anti-Trump paraphernalia have been increasing all year as he’s moved closer and closer to the Republican nomination for the presidency. Quartz draws our attention to an article posted in Chinese state newspaper China Daily that reveals sales of toilet paper rolls with Trump’s pouting face on them have been “rising rapidly” all year.

The toilet paper rolls, which have been given the brand name “Dump With Trump,” are being manufactured by Chinese company Qingdao Wellpaper Industrial Co Ltd, which says it started experiencing a spike in sales in mid-February this year.

“At the start, orders were for around 100 rolls a time, but now we’re getting orders for 5,000 rolls,” a saleswoman told China Daily.

Incidentally, the company also sells toilet paper with Hillary Clinton’s face on it, but the Trump toilet paper has outsold it by a ratio of 6-to-1.

"Taking a Dumpf," has a whole other meaning now!

 

[SEVERUSMAX]

I don't give a crap about Hillary's and Bill's marriage. I really don't care whether or not Bill had two mistresses or twenty. I don't care whether or not the rumors about Hillary being a lesbian or bisexual or pansexual or whatever or true. I don't care about Huma or Anthony Weiner or what or what didn't happen in their marriage. I don't care about Elliot Spitzer. I don't care about John Edwards, Mark Sanford, Robert Bentley, Newt Gingrich (open marriage idea, how genius), or Henry Hyde. Or Donald Trump and his wives. Or The Donald's incestuous thoughts about Ivanka.....sorry, I don't give a shit.

Dennis Hastert, on the other hand, well, what he did was illegal now, wasn't it? An actual crime under Illinois law, and regardless of whether or not you agree with 14 being under the age of consent, he was a coach and the relationship was almost certainly not consensual. It was an abusive, sexual assault situation, and that would have been true if the boys had been girls instead. Gender doesn't matter.

Why so little outrage about Hastert and so much about married men and women having affairs? I mean, really? Worse still, due to the statute of limitations, he will only be charged for the financial crimes, so he'll spend less than 2 years in prison!

 

[JackLuis]

Respected news icon Dan Rather just annihilated Donald Trump on Facebook

The legendary newsman, Dan Rather, took to Facebook on Wednesday to rally members of the press corps to continue to hold Donald Trump accountable. Describing his reaction to Trump’s Tuesday news conference, in which Trump launched an attack on the press in order to avoid answering questions about his disputed claims regarding how much money he had donated to veterans’ organizations, Rather said that he “felt a shudder down my spine.”

“This is a dirty, nasty election. And it is only going to get worse. The reporters in the trenches need no lecture from me. They are walking through daily minefields, bracing themselves against winds of discontent whose effects no one can predict,” Rather wrote.

Dan Rather is familiar with how nasty elections can get. During the 1968 Democratic Convention, when the cops were rioting in the streets and Mayor Daley had declared war on antiwar protesters, Rather continued to work the floor, trying to ask questions of delegates and politicians. He got punched in the stomach on national television for his troubles.

This will be another nasty election.

 

[JackLuis]

New Jersey newspaper torpedoes Trump: He ‘doesn’t respect democracy now. Why would he as president?’

Donald Trump could have stood with veterans the day after Memorial Day, praised them, and finally handed over a check for the money he'd promised but so far failed to give them.

He could have pitched their cause as worthy of more support, and highlighted their suicide rate, their struggle to find good jobs. Their suffering from PTSD and brain damage.

All that would have been presidential. Yet for a man who professes to care, Trump said precious little about veterans on Tuesday. Instead, he made this news conference entirely about himself. His persecution complex was on full display as he unloaded a blistering tirade on the press.

Trump says he raised $5.6M for vets, blasts 'dishonest political press'

The original reason Trump set out to do his January fundraiser, you'll recall, was because he didn't want to attend a Fox News debate and face questions from Megyn Kelly. Now he thinks he shouldn't have to face any questions about the money he promised to raise for veterans, either.

He hurled personal insults at reporters for daring to ask how much he was contributing, and to whom -- calling one a "sleaze," and saying the news media "make me look very bad."

He claimed the real reason he spent months dodging their questions is that he's not looking for credit. (This was after Trump bragged on national television about the millions he'd raised for veterans, and posed with two giant $100,000 checks).

Then, hours after Trump finally disclosed the actual dollar amounts and charities, the Associated Press called all 41 groups and spoke with more than two-dozen. It discovered about half the checks he wrote were dated the same day the Washington Post ran a story questioning whether he'd distributed all of the money.

I wonder how much he skimmed?

 

[JackLuis]

‘This is straight up fraud’: New York’s attorney general shreds Trump University on ‘Morning Joe’

The Trump campaign is doing its best to spin the embarrassing revelations that came out this week about Trump University, but New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman isn’t having any of it. Appearing on Morning Joe on Thursday, Schneiderman tore through any questions about whether Trump University was a legitimate enterprise or not by forcefully making the case that it was “straight up fraud.”

“It’s like selling people something you say is a Mercedes and it turns out to be a Volkswagen,” Schneiderman said. “And even if some people say, ‘Well actually, I kind of like the Volkswagen,’ it’s still fraud because it’s not a Mercedes. This was not a university.”

Schneiderman then went into detail about how Trump blatantly lied about Trump University in marketing videos aimed at prospective students.

“Trump’s role was really a the pitchman,” he said. “And we’ve got his videotapes, and we’ve got his sworn testimony which undercuts every statement in the videotapes. He said, ‘My hand-picked experts will teach you my personal secrets.’ He and the president of the university have already testified under oath he never met the instructors, they weren’t hand-picked. They weren’t experts — some of them came out of fast food and retail. And he had nothing to do with the supposed secrets that were taught because he had nothing to do with the curriculum.”

So who's name was on this fraud? Who should do the time for this? Where is Loretta Lynch and why is she not pressing Federal RICO charges on this interstate fraud? Why is she not pressing charges on Hillary's subversion of Federal Records Laws?

 

[gotsnowgotslush]

Opinion
Editorial

Donald Trump doesn't respect democracy now. Why would he as president?

(gsgs comment- Trump respects nothing. Donald Trump respects no one. Not even himself. /end gsgs comment)

Donald Trump could have stood with veterans the day after Memorial Day, praised them, and finally handed over a check for the money he'd promised but so far failed to give them."

"He could have pitched their cause as worthy of more support, and highlighted their suicide rate, their struggle to find good jobs. Their suffering from PTSD and brain damage."

"All that would have been presidential. Yet for a man who professes to care, Trump said precious little about veterans on Tuesday. Instead, he made this news conference entirely about himself."


http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf...les_of_democracy_now.html#incart_2box_opinion

Did Trump have to be publicly shamed into making his contribution?

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/06/new...pect-democracy-now-why-would-he-as-president/

 

[BotanyBoy]

Opinion
Editorial

Donald Trump doesn't respect democracy now. Why would he as president?

(gsgs comment- Trump respects nothing. Donald Trump respects no one. Not even himself. /end gsgs comment)

Donald Trump could have stood with veterans the day after Memorial Day, praised them, and finally handed over a check for the money he'd promised but so far failed to give them."

"He could have pitched their cause as worthy of more support, and highlighted their suicide rate, their struggle to find good jobs. Their suffering from PTSD and brain damage."

"All that would have been presidential. Yet for a man who professes to care, Trump said precious little about veterans on Tuesday. Instead, he made this news conference entirely about himself."


http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf...les_of_democracy_now.html#incart_2box_opinion

Did Trump have to be publicly shamed into making his contribution?

http://www.rawstory.com/2016/06/new...pect-democracy-now-why-would-he-as-president/

At least he's never sent troops into combat and then left them in the meat grinder with no back up because chickenhawk shit bag didn't want to look bad and own some fuck up......like both Clintons.

Clinton is one of the most hated names in the military because they leave our people behind whenever it's inconvenient to do the right thing and bring them home.

#VeteransAgainstClinton

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

No, you didn't parse the meaning of "If she were for sale, she would've divorced her hubby one of the thousand times he cheated."

If she'd asked for a divorce she'd have been far less saleable than she has been by not divorcing him. She would have sunk into oblivion as a discarded spouse. Instead, she's been a U.S. senator and secretary of state and is running for president and titular leader of the Democratic party (jobs she'd been highly unlikely to get support for as a divorced wife of a president who was still a force in the Democratic Party). She wouldn't have benefited from spousal support from a divorce settlement either. Under federal law, she'd get half of his retirement salary from the government--no more, no less. As they've already pointed out they were practically broke at the end of his term, so no fortune to tap in a divorce settlement. And she's a big moneymaker in her own right. The courts wouldn't have given her spousal support. They didn't even have a house in their name for her to get at the time.

Like a lot of your posts, you don't make a whole lot of sense.

And this isn't even getting around to it being highly unlikely that he's cheated on her as many as 1,000 times. You also like to exaggerate a lot. That doesn't make you any different from many posters to the political board, though.

I didn't parse the meaning of it b/c it was self-explanatory to many, also the reason you wrongly claim I (regularly) make little if any sense, & talk about something being "highly unlikely" that we all know to more-than-likely be true.

If you don't want me to exaggerate, make a thread about how unintelligent you are, where it would be impossible to do so.

 

[sr71plt]

Sorry, I find you pretty dumb. I'm not surprised you don't see it in your posts. It's OK, I'll just stop trying to make sense out of your posts.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Sorry, I find you pretty dumb. I'm not surprised you don't see it in your posts. It's OK, I'll just stop trying to make sense out of your posts.

I'm not surprised you do see it.... As Shakespeare wrote, it's "hold a mirror up to nature"... You are stupid, so you see everything you look at that way.

Feel free to stop trying to making sense of my posts, much the way we all stopped trying to pretend yours made any sense.

 

[sr71plt]

Sounds like a plan.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Sounds like a plan.

Seems like you understood it, &/or it made sense to you... So maybe tomorrow I'll type the translation it obviously actually needs.

 

[sr71plt]

Naw, you just aren't a blip on my scope anymore.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Naw, you just aren't a blip on my scope anymore.

Yet you read, comprehended, & responded to what I wrote... See?! You claim what I write makes no sense to you, & yet write things that based solely on themselves & other things you write cannot be sensible & truthful.

 

[JackLuis]

Legendary radical activist Angela Davis: ‘We have to do whatever is necessary’ to stop Trump

By "Whatever Means Necessary" did she mean 2nd Amendment solutions?

Davis cautioned against allowing GOP candidate Donald Trump to take the election in November.

“We talked about the emergence of new movements, but what we haven’t referred to is the extent to which racism has been revealed and in ways that many of us, who are seasoned activists, had thought to be consigned to dustbin of history,” Davis told a rapt audience.

She cautioned against allowing “apathy” to permit “incendiary” people like Trump to seize power.