Trump

Oh look at you deciding what words are and aren't real, I'll be sure and take that seriously from the guy who fucks up the quote function. :rolleyes:

Noah Webster made that decision, & you never argued with him. I'm not sure who decides what words go in that dictionary now, but I know "brah" is likely not in it.

Working eyes & working brain =/= partisan dick suckery. And WOW do you polish a good (D) knob...

This quote is invisible b/c it's ignored by the human race like most of the BS farmers avoid.

Oh look you can't read for fuck either, shocking :rolleyes:

I read & comprehended just fine. I even gave you credit for something, yet you attack me again! Do you do that when someone compliments you on polishing their knob, or just raise the tip (the financial one you pay them, not in their pants)?
 
Noah Webster made that decision,

Cite?

& you never argued with him. I'm not sure who decides what words go in that dictionary now, but I know "brah" is likely not in it.

That dictionary isn't the only one and since you don't know (which isn't shocking) I'm sorry you're just making shit up and don't have anything to back your BS up again do ya? Good one brah!
 

Another spelling mistake! It's spelled "site".

That dictionary isn't the only one and since you don't know (which isn't shocking) I'm sorry you're just making shit up and don't have anything to back your BS up again do ya? Good one brah!

I don't have any BS to back up. I know a lot, including the fact you know far less if anything. Also, I know I refuse to respond any more unless you get on-topic, factual, & using actual words.
 
Republicans pan Trump’s Orlando response: ‘Saying nothing would have been better’

Classic Trumpisims in the news.

Donald Trump earned poor marks for his response to the massacre at the Pulse gay nightclub in Orlando — and not just from Democrats.

In a Politico report this morning, several Republicans wasted no time slamming Trump’s response to the Orlando terror attack by fuming that they’re sick of having to answer for all the outlandish things Trump says on a daily basis.

In case you missed it, Trump once again renewed his call to ban Muslims from entering the country; called out “the Muslims” for not turning in every Muslim whom they suspect to be involved in planning terror attacks; called on President Obama to resign for not saying the words “radical Islam”; and even insinuated that Obama secretly supports Islamist terrorists.

“Saying nothing would have been better,” said a Republican National Committee who wished to remain anonymous. “Every Senate candidate will be forced to answer for Trump’s bizarre response… His lack of empathy is jarring.”

Donald you're just too crazy for Republicans. Which if you think about Ted Cruz, Huckabee, and Hillary Clinton has to be scary.
 
‘Morning Joe’ compares Trump’s comments on Obama to ‘scumbags’ who blamed Bush for 9/11

Donald Trump appeared to connect President Barack Obama to the mass shooting in Orlando, and panelists on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” agreed those comments should disqualify him as a presidential candidate.

Trump, who entered national politics by questioning whether Obama was born in the U.S., said the president had “something else in mind” when it came to stopping terrorist attacks.

The presumptive Republican nominee banned the Washington Post from covering his campaign after he accused the newspaper of “inaccurate coverage and reporting” on his remarks, which were broadcast Monday morning on live TV by “Fox & Friends.”

“Morning Joe” host Joe Scarborough compared Trump adding the Post to his list of banned news organizations to the pope prohibiting Bibles at Mass and Major League Baseball outlawing bats.

“It gets worse by the day on the campaign trail,” Scarborough said.

Trump has promised to act more presidential after making one outrageous statement or another, but Scarborough said his statements about Obama were completely outrageous — and he criticized the GOP candidate’s cowardly dodge.

“Then saying, ‘Well, I’ll let people just try to figure out what I said,’ it reminds me (of) when a lot of scumbags said that George W. Bush had something to do with 9/11,” Scarborough said.

Trump may ban all the newspapers who accurately quote him, because they are not balanced. Maybe if the news only covered him if he pays up front, we'd never have to hear from this asshole again?
 
Trump won just 14 percent of the votes and no delegates in yesterday's Washington, D.C., primary (Rubio won with 36 percent). "When" he takes office, he might consider moving the executive mansion down here in my neighborhood to Albemarle House, which he owns, and which might have as much square footage as the White House (and that he owns because he swindled someone who thought he was her friend and was helping her out of bankruptcy).
 
Last edited:
Today Donald Trump tweeted, "I will be meeting with the NRA, who has endorsed me, about not allowing people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns."

By the end of the week, he will be backpedaling.
 
The no fly list/terrorist watch list is a secret list that you not only don't know your own you have no way to get yourself off it.

So yeah that's a no.
 
Today Donald Trump tweeted, "I will be meeting with the NRA, who has endorsed me, about not allowing people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns."

By the end of the week, he will be backpedaling.

He'll listen to Wayne La Pierre and realize that he was really saying is, "Buy all the Guns, because Clinton will ban them soon."

Hell, Trump may end up buying a new Glock so he can conceal carry at the convention. You know because he is so afraid people won't give him a fair shake. Everybody is mean to him and he needs his guns.
 
The no fly list/terrorist watch list is a secret list that you not only don't know your own you have no way to get yourself off it.

So yeah that's a no.
I actually don't have a problem with such a law provided that included in the the same bill are provisions that the lists must first be overhauled and a clear and straightforward way be made available to get yourself off the list, including the right to confront your accuser in court. And if you win, the government pays all court costs and reimburses the person for any lost wages arising from being on the list and/or getting your name removed.
 
I'd be willing to give that a shot but it doesn't sound plausible. The whole point of such a list is that you can keep an eye on people without tipping your hand. I don't REALLY agree with the list period but if you're gonna make the information public it's defeating the purpose. And are you going to restrict guns to friends and family or put groups on the watch list? In the case of this recent shooting so far nothing has come up suggesting his wife was on any lists or had been investigated and while I expect that nothing will come of it they are NOW investigating her. Should she be found guilty we're right back at square one.
 
I'd be willing to give that a shot but it doesn't sound plausible. The whole point of such a list is that you can keep an eye on people without tipping your hand. I don't REALLY agree with the list period but if you're gonna make the information public it's defeating the purpose. And are you going to restrict guns to friends and family or put groups on the watch list? In the case of this recent shooting so far nothing has come up suggesting his wife was on any lists or had been investigated and while I expect that nothing will come of it they are NOW investigating her. Should she be found guilty we're right back at square one.

Agree with all this. Where a whole class of guns needs to be curtailed is at the source. Ones right to get the thrill of firing at a target at a range with a rapid-fire weapon (the only defensible reason to have such weapons in civilian hands) does not supersede the right of me or my loved ones to go to school, the movies, a church, or a club and not be mowed down by anyone. Just outlaw the sale of whole classes of weapons to the public. The argument that you can convert anything is just a dumb, malicious blind--you certainly can, but the ability of having such a weapon would be significantly curtailed.

Another thought is to declare the NRA a domestic terrorist organization (which it has become) and put all of its members on a terrorist watch list.
 
Trump’s poll numbers sink into death spiral on the one-year anniversary of his campaign’s start

It’s been one year since Donald Trump took that fateful ride down the escalator at Trump Tower to announce his candidacy for President of the United States — and his poll numbers are absolutely tanking despite the fact that he’s seemingly locked down the Republican nomination for the presidency.

Here is a chart from Real Clear Politics that shows what’s happened to Trump’s polling averages ever since he got a brief boost after clinching his status as the presumptive Republican nominee:
Average of polls shows;
Clinton 44%
Trump 39%

On May 24th Trump was even with Hillary.

On the other hand avg of polls shows
Bernie 49%
Trump 39%
Trump was last even with Bernie on December 12th.

Considering the margin of error ~4% Bernie is still the best candidate to beat Trump.
 
I've been waiting for this to happen!

The GOP’s top national security icon just announced he’s backing Clinton over Trump

A high-ranking Republican has vowed to vote for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton instead of his own party’s Donald Trump, citing concerns over Trump’s lack of interest in foreign policy issues, Politico reports.

Richard Armitage, who served as secretary of state under George W. Bush, has vowed to vote for Clinton in what Politico calls “one of the most dramatic signs yet that Republican national security elites are rejecting their party’s presumptive nominee.”

“If Donald Trump is the nominee, I would vote for Hillary Clinton,” Armitage told Politico. “He doesn’t appear to be to be a Republican, he doesn’t appear to want to learn about issues. So I’m going to vote for Mrs. Clinton.”

Armitage told Politico that many of his conservative friends with backgrounds in national security are confused about what to do.

Trumps anti-establishment rhetoric now has lost him the Republican establishment!
 
Illinois GOP senator runs scared from Trump: He’s ‘too bigoted and racist’ to be president

Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL) is in the race of his political career and Donald Trump’s sinking poll numbers are making things tough on his 2016 reelection bid. Perhaps that is why Kirk denounced Trump so emphatically, Thursday, saying Trump is “too bigoted and racist” to be president.

In an interview with “Big” John Howell on Chicago’s WLS-AM 890, Kirk was asked if he thinks Trump could be a solid commander in chief that understands threats like the Orlando shooting or if Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton would be a better president.

Kirk clarified he absolutely didn’t support Clinton but doesn’t like Trump either. “I think he’s too bigoted and racist for the Land of Lincoln.”

Kirk said that when he votes in November he intends to write-in former CIA Director David Petraeus, who was caught sending classified documents to his mistress.

“I think if he announced, he would just light up the political spectrum,” Kirk said.
 

Anyone else notice this is coming from the home state of the current President, who came from the other major party?

Also, not sure I'm right on this, but I believe someone who got a high position in IL politics after BO got the job he has now (Rahm E, if I recall right; Also think he had backing &/or friendship with Barack) then had scandals & things of his own once getting in the office/job he did.
 
Republican Gov. Larry Hogan says he won’t vote for Donald Trump

Maryland’s Republican governor said Wednesday that he doesn’t plan to vote for the party’s presumptive presidential nominee, Donald Trump.

“No, I don’t plan to,” Larry Hogantold The Washington Post when asked Wednesday whether he would cast a ballot for Mr. Trump. “I guess when I get behind the curtain I’ll have to figure it out. Maybe write someone in. I’m not sure.”

The first-term governor said he isn’t “pleased” with any of the candidates in the presidential race.

“I don’t think either party has put up its best candidate,” he said.

Mr. Hogan has repeatedly said he doesn’t support Mr. Trump, but declined to say whether he would vote for the real estate mogul until now, The Post reported. Mr. Hogan said he does not plan to attend the Republican National Convention this summer.

At least Bush would have gotten more support from the Republican base. I read that some are begging "W" to come help them raise money for November.
 
Washington Times reports:

Some of the Republicans in the Senate were eager to add to Democratic scorn for the Donald. Jeff Flake of Arizona was happy to total up the 16 million votes Mr. Trump won in the primaries and to point out with a certain glee that he’ll need 65 million in November and isn’t likely to get them. Susan Collins of Maine says she isn’t sure she will vote Republican. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina says America “will never win this war [against terrorism] without partners in the faith.” Whose faith, he did not say. Bob Corker of Tennessee says “Trump continues to be discouraging.”

It is a real tragedy that the GOP has lost the principles of Eisenhower and become the scum suckers of Roveian, "Win at any cost."

Latest polls
Clinton 44%
Trump 38%

Bernie 54% in last polls I saw.. Of course the Demo's will never pick a winner, not when 'It's Hillary's turn in the barrel."
 
Last edited:
We should just keep a list at this point.

I was keeping a list of people who endorsed Trump. Nixonian of me I know, but the man is basically unqualified by experience and disqualified by disposition. I don't trust the judgement of anybody who doesn't see that and speak against it.
 
Dozens of GOP delegates launch new push to halt Donald Trump

Dozens of Republican convention delegates are hatching a new plan to block Donald Trump at this summer’s party meetings, in what has become the most organized effort so far to stop the businessman from becoming the GOP presidential nominee.

The moves come amid declining poll numbers for Trump and growing concern among Republicans that he is squandering his chance to defeat Democrat Hillary Clinton.

The new push is being run by people who can actually make changes to party rules, rather than by pundits and media figures who have been pining for a Trump alternative. Many of the delegates involved supported Sen. Ted Cruz (Tex.) in the primary race but say they are not taking cues from any of Trump’s vanquished opponents.

“This literally is an ‘Anybody but Trump’ movement,” said Kendal Unruh, a Republican delegate from Colorado who is leading the campaign. “Nobody has any idea who is going to step in and be the nominee, but we’re not worried about that. We’re just doing that job to make sure that he’s not the face of our party.”

The Dump Trump movement arises!
 
Back
Top