sirhugs
Riding to the Rescue
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2002
- Posts
- 42,746
To the contrary, several anthropological studies suggest that the genetic risks underlie an instinct NOT to engage in incest. Obviously, early man did not have the means to calculate the risks, but in most civilisations, incest has been taboo from ancient even prehistoric times.it’s simply genetics and primal instincts.
Because inbreeding results more commonly in defects, natural selection then accounts for breeding any incest "gene" out of the population. Populations that inbred has a much higher rate of dying off.
Even in European nobility, one of the last bastions of intermarriage, there was nothing "primal" or "instinct" about it- it was a combination of politics and wanting to keep the bloodlines "pure", very intentionally, which is the opposite of instinctual.
