First EVER Supreme Court Leak: Roe V. Wade overturned

Also not mentioned in the Constitution: judicial review.
More crap from the bullshit squad.

Article III, Section 1​

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.

Section 2

The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;—between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
 
well, it was a stretch, then, all common sense broke down when he tried to inject separation of church and state and the religious right, that made my eyes water so I answered his incoherent statement with another and you being the retard that you are ya couldn't resist vomiting all over our conversation. Did you feel left out or something?
Luk and FOMO are synonymous.
 
He's an anti-American socialist, is it' really surprising to you he doesn't recognize private property rights???
What I find amazing is the complete lack of ANY Constitutional knowledge by those who come here and make proclamations of what is and isn't in the Constitution.

This is basic stuff and they have no freaking clue, yet want everyone to believe that they're "experts" on the subject.
 
What I find amazing is the complete lack of ANY Constitutional knowledge by those who come here and make proclamations of what is and isn't in the Constitution.

This is basic stuff and they have no freaking clue, yet want everyone to believe that they're "experts" on the subject.

LOL it's pretty amazing how out of touch they are with what the USA is......

Listening to them you would have thought this nation was founded a unitary state, direct democracy and explicitly for the purpose of achieving the socialist fantasy of an equity centric utopia.

That "education" system...... is in a bad way.
 
LOL it's pretty amazing how out of touch they are with what the USA is......

Listening to them you would have thought this nation was founded a unitary state, direct democracy and explicitly for the purpose of achieving the socialist fantasy of an equity centric utopia.

That "education" system...... is in a bad way.
The current "education system" teaches people that if they scream loud enough they'll get what they want.

Based on empirical evidence that must be 3 hots and a cot because that's what most of them get in the end.
 
Which is why every time Dems win the Right hold's their breath until we bow to them and gain nothing in return. What I didn't see in there is anything that states that the SCOTUS has any right to privacy.
 
Actually, all it would take is a federal law which affirmatively states that all health care decisions between a patient and medical provider, including decision regarding abortion and/or procreation, are within the restrictions placed on government in the 4th Amendment's "person" and "effects" and, absent reasonable cause to believe that a crime has been committed, no federal or state government can disavow any health care decision made by anyone when that decision is between a patient and their medical care provider.

I could easily draft that law in 1 paragraph which would also allow "reasonable regulation" in the name of ensuring the public welfare (standardized and universal medical accreditation, sanitation, etc) for all medical procedures. The current majority in the House and 50 senators with the VP as the override would make it a law.
So, the question about modern technology, what a "person" is in the 14th Amendment, and when the viability of life begins, and the rights of that life, will never be litigated again and the issue will be settled? We've had 50 years of strife and have divided the nation over those questions that wouldn't be settled by a blanket statement about personal health. American history has never supported the wholesale slaughter of the unborn, never. My thought is we are never going to get to the point where the American people don't get to vote on this subject.
 
So, the question about modern technology, what a "person" is in the 14th Amendment, and when the viability of life begins, and the rights of that life, will never be litigated again and the issue will be settled? We've had 50 years of strife and have divided the nation over those questions that wouldn't be settled by a blanket statement about personal health. American history has never supported the wholesale slaughter of the unborn, never. My thought is we are never going to get to the point where the American people don't get to vote on this subject.
Until it is removed from the woman, the woman must always get priority. For the government, if they aren't officially a citizen, they have no say.
 
"wholesale slaughter of the unborn"?

Somebody get that Marine a fainting couch!
 
The Growing Cinematic Trend Of The Abortion Road Trip Movie Is Our Bleak Reality

Fifteen years ago, Jason Reitman and Diablo Cody's Academy Award-winning teen pregnancy comedy "Juno" told the story of a pregnant teen who at first walks right into her local abortion clinic, only having to deal with a sole protestor and an odd receptionist who is way too comfortable talking about the smell of her boyfriend's junk. Juno eventually decides against having an abortion, instead choosing to pursue the route of adoption. Emphasis on the word "choosing." Two years later, the market was flooded with pregnant teen media, like MTV's "Teen Mom" and Lifetime movies like "The Pregnancy Pact." In recent years, stories about teen pregnancy have shifted dramatically to more accurately reflect the continued attacks from the United States government on reproductive rights.

In 2015, Paul Weitz introduced the "Abortion Road Trip Movie" to the mainstream with "Grandma" starring Lily Tomlin as a widowed lesbian who is asked by her granddaughter, Sage (Julia Garner) for assistance in paying for and seeking an abortion. Weitz was inspired by the lack of mainstream films that depict abortion, telling The Mary Sue, "There have been a lot of movies in the past which were unwilling to even use the word, despite millions of women having abortions ... so I just wanted it to be real." The film "Knocked Up" even made an entire bit about saying "shmashmortion" in place of the word.

The taboo nature of abortion in real life has bled into our media, which is probably why so many people end up learning from what they see on screen, and haven't fully grasped the severity of how mind-bogglingly difficult it has become to seek an abortion. The ease of entry shown in "Juno" no longer exists, and so the "Abortion Road Trip Movie" was born.
In 2021, Hulu released Natalie Morales' "Plan B," about a young Indian girl (Kuhoo Verma) who is denied access to emergency contraception (AKA The Morning After Pill or Plan B) when a pharmacist refuses to sell it to her. If you think that sounds like something out of "The Handmaid's Tale," understand that these "conscience laws" implemented during the Trump administration are very real. In some states, the personal conscience of a pharmacist or health provider has more legal value than someone in need of reproductive medical intervention (Biden claims that he's going to roll these back). The plot of "Plan B" operates on a time crunch as emergency contraceptives are only effective when taken as soon as possible, so this pharmacist's denial puts Sunny and her best friend Lupe (Victoria Moroles) in a race against time. There's a good amount of humor scattered throughout, but the film stands alone in its centering of non-white protagonists. People of color face exponentially more barriers to reproductive health than their white counterparts, and "Plan B" isn't afraid to tackle those realities head-on.
Plan B is an awesome flick.
 
Until it is removed from the woman, the woman must always get priority. For the government, if they aren't officially a citizen, they have no say.
The female is not the only party with an interest in the birth of a child. And unless we're talking about your favorite emoji, it takes two individuals to create a pregnancy.
 
The female is not the only party with an interest in the birth of a child. And unless we're talking about your favorite emoji, it takes two individuals to create a pregnancy.
Good..then the men should be jailed every time the woman is for an abortion.

Make sure you give a copy of your ID upon intercourse
 
Well I suspected that it was to motivate the Left, but in fairness they attacked Disney as well. Like the Republicans are tired of winning so much. I'm curious why exactly we the people don't have the right to watch our public servants at work?
 
Good..then the men should be jailed every time the woman is for an abortion.

Make sure you give a copy of your ID upon intercourse
Because the SCOTUS ruling will send women who get abortion to prison. Got it. The hyperbole gets crazier by the hour.
 
Well I suspected that it was to motivate the Left, but in fairness they attacked Disney as well. Like the Republicans are tired of winning so much. I'm curious why exactly we the people don't have the right to watch our public servants at work?
Because interpreting the law is supposed to be apolitical.
 
Back
Top