Which has nothing to do with a sperm donor donating sperm. Also this issue was addressed earlier on, that you are too stupid to remember reading it, or you were just dumb enough to jump in and quote me, not understand the context, only points towards your ignorance, as I said, "did you take a double dose of stupid". I get it can happen, we all get forgetful as we age.
It still takes 2 people, a male and a female, even if it’s a test tube baby it still takes two people make a baby whether human carry or tube.
A woman might want it that way.
This was addressed earlier, hell I even pointed out the posts....at this point, I think you are just trolling, hell even I don't think you are as stupid as you're appearing to be right now....*chuckles*
Abortion pills are going to become popular soon enough
thankyou
Their have been polls on this but it just means they need to keep their mouths shut about which party they are in.
I wouldn't think so. A man's actual political stance isn't going to change the risk to the woman of having sex--with lots of examples coming out that condoms and Plan B are risks as well.
My message was to the men responsible for pushing this--that I think they aren't going to be getting nearly as much action (even from their wives) as they did before they did what they did. It wasn't to men in general. It was to those Yahoos who are pushing it.
Mooooove those goalposts!
If Justice Alito had only known that his wife was going give him less pussy, he never would have penned that draft.
The question never arises if the court decides that the 4th Amendment's Right to privacy extends to all medical decisions between a patient and medical provider. The 14th never comes into the picture because "person" as currently defined in the law requires that the child be "born alive."
You are wrong. Republicans have no morals. The risk is inherently higher. But it is their choice...fuck a retard...have a retard.
Actually, this isn't true and the fact that it isn't true is why abortion supporters aren't talking about how the draft decision in Dobbs puts the question back under State control rather than Federal control.
When people break the law, what happens exactly?
The number of states severely restricting abortions once the ruling comes down is in the double digits. And if you believe that the envelope isn't being moved towards outright banning of the procedure, you haven't been paying attention to the people creating the legislation being considered.
I was just repeating some of the predications being loosely tossed around by some who are enraged by the pending decision that will soon put the question in the hands of democratically elected representatives in statehouses rather than nine unelected justices.
^ Chief Rumormonger.
The hand wringing and shrieking are more important to them than facts right now.
It’s interesting that so many of the screamers fear things that are extremely unlikely to materialize. The good news as time passes, they will come to realize that their deep anxiety was unwarranted.
