If you voted for Trump, you support him & you own him forever. Fuck your "safe space"

[FGB]

So, by that logic, when this country becomes a socialist regime, it'll be your fault. Thanks for the clarification.

Not a problem...and strangely enough you are pretty much correct.

And also WE don't have or need "Safe Spaces".

That's them Loony liberals.

 

[RoryN]

Not a problem...and strangely enough you are pretty much correct.

And also WE don't have or need "Safe Places".

LOL!!!

This forum is a 'safe space" that you and like-minded righties frequent daily.

Your not taking 100% responsibility for your vote is a "safe space".

Your religion is a "safe space".

Righties sequester themselves away from those different from them all the time in real life. Those are "safe spaces".

And on, and on, and on.

 

[KeithD]

This forum is a 'safe space" that you and like-minded righties frequent daily.

Yep. This is an erotica story site. How many Trumpettes using Literotica as a safe space for their opinions have made any connection at all to what this as an erotica story site?

 

[OldJourno]

Yep. This is an erotica story site. How many Trumpettes using Literotica as a safe space for their opinions have made any connection at all to what this as an erotica story site?

I gather only non-Trumpettes can understand this.
Let me copy it and savor it: How many Trumpettes using Literotica as a safe space for their opinions have made any connection at all to what this as an erotica story site?
Just splendid. Was he actually trying to make a point, or was he just throwing random words out there?
Either way it's pure genius.

 

[KeithD]

Yeah it was code for forming the next assault on the alien Trumpettes on the board.

 

[jp55665566]

haha

I gather only non-Trumpettes can understand this.
Let me copy it and savor it: How many Trumpettes using Literotica as a safe space for their opinions have made any connection at all to what this as an erotica story site?
Just splendid. Was he actually trying to make a point, or was he just throwing random words out there?
Either way it's pure genius.

he's a bleepin' butcher

 

[nowisthetime]

What a moron.. Still up posting stupid. You're hilarious when you get triggered and none of the other rwcj jump in and help.

Obama was a thousand times better that cheetolini... Even with the right wing obstruction..

Repug Deplorable tears.

Silly, racist bozos have the nerve to compare an underachieving, lazy, ignorant, mediocre, hideous, beastly ogre to a fine president? Why? Oh I forgot, the melanin is a problem for their dumbasses.

I'm with Rory, FUCK their feelings.

 

[nowisthetime]

Not a problem...and strangely enough you are pretty much correct.

And also WE don't have or need "Safe Spaces".

That's them Loony liberals.

Ya'lls safe space is called the KKK along with all those other alt right hate group turfs.

Go roll your eyes somewhere else like a catty little brat.

As for Looney libz, lmao, no one is more of a Looney Tune than your ugly ass leader. Projection is quite a witch.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

I gather only non-Trumpettes can understand this.
Let me copy it and savor it: How many Trumpettes using Literotica as a safe space for their opinions have made any connection at all to what this as an erotica story site?
Just splendid. Was he actually trying to make a point, or was he just throwing random words out there?
Either way it's pure genius.

Well, it was pretty easy to understand. If you're not spending every day at an erotica site for matters of the prurient interest, then what exactly are you hiding from?

Don't know what else to tell ya, guy. Y'all blindfolded and on text-to-speech or something? This ain't Bird Box, bish.

At least ya copied good. How's that savoring going for you?

 

[CandiCame]

Repug Deplorable tears.

Silly, racist bozos have the nerve to compare an underachieving, lazy, ignorant, mediocre, hideous, beastly ogre to a fine president? Why? Oh I forgot, the melanin is a problem for their dumbasses.

I'm with Rory, FUCK their feelings.

Idk I kinda feel like "mediocre" is... pretty generous. I'd be happy to move up to mediocre at this point.

This dude can't even instruct employees to move to the shower when he wants to piss on them.

 

[Bill_Cosplay]

I gather only non-Trumpettes can understand this.
Let me copy it and savor it: How many Trumpettes using Literotica as a safe space for their opinions have made any connection at all to what this as an erotica story site?
Just splendid. Was he actually trying to make a point, or was he just throwing random words out there?
Either way it's pure genius.

I made fun of Dems for using Literotica as a way to get revenge from behind their computers when I first came onto the politics forum and KeithD has been using that in one form or another ever since. . . . He's very .

 

[RoryN]

I made fun of Dems for using Literotica as a way to get revenge from behind their computers when I first came onto the politics forum and KeithD has been using that in one form or another ever since. . . . He's very .

Pssst - hey, dummy.

Your sig says I'm on iggy.

Yet here you are, in my thread.

Care to explain?

 

[Bill_Cosplay]

Pssst - hey, dummy.

Your sig says I'm on iggy.

Yet here you are, in my thread.

Care to explain?

I looked at the post I've quoted because I figured it would be something stupid since you posted right after me, and you didn't disappoint.

But, hey dummy, I'll answer your question.

When you're on the Main Literotica Forums page, there is a column that says LAST POST, where I can see the last post made in any forum. So, while I can't see any threads that you've created when I go to the General Board, if someone posts in your thread then I can see that they have on the LAST POST column in the Main Literotica Forums page. From there I can click it and read it and even end up in one of your silly threads.

You've been here since 2003 and you have to ask how someone who has you on ignore can wind up in your thread? That's pretty

 

[CandiCame]

I looked at the post I've quoted because I figured it would be something stupid since you posted right after me, and you didn't disappoint.

But, hey dummy, I'll answer your question.

When you're on the Main Literotica Forums page, there is a column that says LAST POST, where I can see the last post made in any forum. So, while I can't see any threads that you've created when I go to the General Board, if someone posts in your thread then I can see that they have on the LAST POST column in the Main Literotica Forums page. From there I can click it and read it and even end up in one of your silly threads.

You've been here since 2003 and you have to ask how someone who has you on ignore can wind up in your thread? That's pretty

That seems like a lot of trouble to go through from where I'm standing. To interact with someone you don't want to interact with.

Like if I'm super bored and someone I've got on iggy posts right under me I'll sometimes click it to see what kind of fresh bullshit they're on, but I don't really go looking for threads they've started.

 

[RoryN]

I looked at the post I've quoted because I figured it would be something stupid since you posted right after me, and you didn't disappoint.

But, hey dummy, I'll answer your question.

When you're on the Main Literotica Forums page, there is a column that says...

I know how it can happen, dummy. I'm wondering why you'd be stupid enough to tout having me on iggy...but then still frequent my threads and respond to my posts (like you just did).

That's this most basic "fail" there is; it means I'm under your skin like an Alabama tick. Why give me the satisfaction?

 

[Bill_Cosplay]

That seems like a lot of trouble to go through from where I'm standing. To interact with someone you don't want to interact with.

Like if I'm super bored and someone I've got on iggy posts right under me I'll sometimes click it to see what kind of fresh bullshit they're on, but I don't really go looking for threads they've started.

I didn't know it was his thread. And I stayed on the thread after I posted. Then I hit the refresh button and I thought ... hmmm? (Now he'll try to save face.)

You should stop over complicating simple things.

 

[CandiCame]

I didn't know it was his thread. And I stayed on the thread after I posted. Then I hit the refresh button and I thought ... hmmm? (Now he'll try to save face.)

You should stop over complicating simple things.

I over-complicated something by saying we have different posting styles?

 

[Bill_Cosplay]

I over-complicated something by saying we have different posting styles?

You tried to imply that I went out of my way to be on this thread to interact with someone I don't want to interact with ... that's over complicating my explanation as to how I ended up here. You really shouldn't, makes you uninteresting.

I'm going to leave this thread now, try not to yourself anymore.

 

[RoryN]

You should stop over complicating simple things.

Translation: "You're confusing me - cut it out!"

 

[CandiCame]

You tried to imply that I went out of my way to be on this thread to interact with someone I don't want to interact with ... that's over complicating my explanation as to how I ended up here. You really shouldn't, makes you uninteresting.

I'm going to leave this thread now, try not to yourself anymore.

I didn't imply anything, my bro. I don't do that. Ever. I'm not passive aggressive, I'm just... aggressive.

The subtleties of language are lost on me.

 

[cowslinger64]

I made fun of Dems for using Literotica as a way to get revenge from behind their computers when I first came onto the politics forum and KeithD has been using that in one form or another ever since. . . . He's very .

You tried to imply that I went out of my way to be on this thread to interact with someone I don't want to interact with ... that's over complicating my explanation as to how I ended up here. You really shouldn't, makes you uninteresting.

I'm going to leave this thread now, try not to yourself anymore.

Lol... are you another queball alt?


Btw... none of us hiding behind our monitors, we're not right wing weasels.

 

[cowslinger64]

This idiot is the biggest reason our gubmint is in a shutdown, and less safe than before.

Even bigger idiots are the ones that support him.


https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-touts-border-wall-san-004241056.html


President Donald Trump on Saturday boasted to reporters about how well San Antonio’s border wall is working. But the Texas city is 150 miles from the Mexican border and has no wall.

“Everybody knows that walls work. You look at different places, they put up a wall, no problem,” Trump said outside the White House. “You look at San Antonio, you look at so many different places, they go from one of the most unsafe cities in the country to one of the safest cities, immediately, immediately.”



=======


Jeeeezus

 

[HisArpy]

I don't see why. Do you think Ocasio-Cortex would have unseated Crowley were it not for Trump? Or that we'd have the biggest and most diverse D takeover of the House since um, oh, yeah, the last most inept and corrupt R President. Hmmm. Sounds like established history to me.

I'm not denying AOC wouldn't have won had it not been for Trump. I'm not saying it's true, but I'm not denying it. Her district is kind of whacko and Crowley had issues of his own.

However, I'm also going to point out that your "biggest and most diverse D takeover of the House" is pure BS. It's a bumper sticker slogan designed to obscure the truth and facts behind spin and partisanship.

FACTS:

in mid-term elections, the D's won 40 seats in 2016. This was after they LOST 69 seats in 2010. They also LOST 60 seats in 1994 under Clinton. And the R's picked up 10 seats in 2002.

So, since 1994 the D's have LOST 139 seats total in mid-term elections.

They've only gained 36 (2006) and 5 (1998) for a total of 41. That's an overall LOSS of 98 seats.

If you only want to talk 2016, the AVERAGE turnover in Mid-Term elections is 30 seats. And the D's only flipped 10 more than average and then only after 3 or 4 (IIRC) extremely tight races where the D barely squeaked by.

That's is not anything even close to the "biggest and most diverse D takeover of the House". You can tout is as "huge" if you want, but the truth is - it wasn't. It wasn't a referendum or mandate either as shown by the many very close results even after the huge turnout by D voters.

Source for numbers:
https://www.thoughtco.com/historical-midterm-election-results-4087704

 

[Colonel Hogan]

I'm not denying AOC wouldn't have won had it not been for Trump. I'm not saying it's true, but I'm not denying it. Her district is kind of whacko and Crowley had issues of his own.

However, I'm also going to point out that your "biggest and most diverse D takeover of the House" is pure BS. It's a bumper sticker slogan designed to obscure the truth and facts behind spin and partisanship.

FACTS:

in mid-term elections, the D's won 40 seats in 2016. This was after they LOST 69 seats in 2010. They also LOST 60 seats in 1994 under Clinton. And the R's picked up 10 seats in 2002.

So, since 1994 the D's have LOST 139 seats total in mid-term elections.

They've only gained 36 (2006) and 5 (1998) for a total of 41. That's an overall LOSS of 98 seats.

If you only want to talk 2016, the AVERAGE turnover in Mid-Term elections is 30 seats. And the D's only flipped 10 more than average and then only after 3 or 4 (IIRC) extremely tight races where the D barely squeaked by.

That's is not anything even close to the "biggest and most diverse D takeover of the House". You can tout is as "huge" if you want, but the truth is - it wasn't. It wasn't a referendum or mandate either as shown by the many very close results even after the huge turnout by D voters.

Source for numbers:
https://www.thoughtco.com/historical-midterm-election-results-4087704

 

[HisArpy]

The cat box is down the hall. Behind the second door to your left.