djrip
Oneirographer
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2015
- Posts
- 1,823
I can't understand quitting a story over a 5-10 word description of a character scanning a room, at all. Bizarre, really. I guess I could understand if the style is overly descriptive and wordy throughout, but that's something I'd realize over paragraphs or a page. If it got to be too much, sure I could see someone deciding it's not for them. But noping out over one particular clause in a sentence? Weird.I stumbled on this thread today and was surprised to see one of my stories listed in the OP. Very cool! Thanks for the shoutout, @Sexecclectic. I'm happy the story struck a chord with you.
I had a lot of fun learning about forgeries and forensic art detectives for this story. It's fascinating stuff. Glad you enjoyed that bit.
Absolutely fair. I also prefer simple, spare descriptions. I tend to write that way unless I have a reason not to. The reason for this particular sentence was to foreshadow the twist later in the story. *Spoiler* The woman visiting the art detective's office is a forger. She's essentially casing the place and sizing up the opposition. The intention of that sentence was to plant a seed in the reader's head (why would she be cataloging the office's contents?) that would be harvested after the reveal (ahh...because she's meticulous and wanted to know what she was up against). Maybe that didn't work for some readers and just sounded like the writer inserting their voice into the story. If so, that's a completely valid criticism. Just thought you might be interested in the "why" behind it.