RuReal
Long time Litster
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2005
- Posts
- 3,867
I asked him how he felt about casual sex and he evaded that anser Geoff so you have really hit the nail on the head.
No, you don't.
You recommend "love" because female submissives will be "used" by "abusers" if they get involved in "casual BDSM".
Nothing I've seen you write cautions male submissives. Nothing I've seen you write warns off female Dominants from being used by male submissives. Hell, nothing you've written addresses the male Doms who get hoodwinked and sucked in by emotionally, physically, and financially draining female submissives.
By your definition and description - any "casual" relationship that doesn't involve "love is "unethical".
Again, the BDSM aspect of any relationship, in and of itself, is irrelevant. A BDSM relationship, just like any other relationship is either practiced in an ethical, healthy way, or it is practiced in an unethical, unhealthy way whether the participants are "in love" or not.
Quit harping on BDSM unless you are going to harp on "casual" vanilla sexual relationships. And "casual" business relationships. And "casual" friendship relationships.
It's the PEOPLE, not the activity, that are or are not ethical and/or unhealthy.