Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Autism does not correlated to lack of sexual desire(ask me)
Good point. I am autistic but not asexual.There are more (in %) asexual people among autistic people than among the whole population - but I suspect the same may be true for hypersexuals. Autistic community is full of all kinds of deviations from "normal" sexuality and gender.
meh, sex... I can take it or leave it. I'm whatevsexualGood point. I am autistic but not asexual.
Sex is an interesting one with me. I like sex, but I am not randomly horny like some guys who would hump a pile of rocks if they thought there was a snake under it. That said, with the right woman I have a very high level of desire, and can be quite inventive.There are more (in %) asexual people among autistic people than among the whole population - but I suspect the same may be true for hypersexuals. Autistic community is full of all kinds of deviations from "normal" sexuality and gender.
Same. I also happen to be cis-straight, but the amount of all kinds of rainbow people among autistic people is huge.Good point. I am autistic but not asexual.
I have so, so, so many questions about this...Sex is an interesting one with me. I like sex, but I am not randomly horny like some guys who would hump a pile of rocks if they thought there was a snake under it.
Well your question has kicked a hornets nest... maybe a horniest nest?I have so, so, so many questions about this...
So, they think there's a snake, and thus they hump the rocks? Are they trying to... fuck the snake? Why a snake? Why not pick up the rock to get to the snake? How frequently are guys doing this? Is this some weird cultural thing I'm unaware of? Is it only random horniness that causes snake-infested rock pile humping, or can non-random horniness induce rock humps? Do certain species of snakes cause this behavior more than others?
Though, to be fair, snake anthros are sexy as all get out![]()
Yeah - the first time I heard the expression my brain ran all of those scenarios.I have so, so, so many questions about this...
So, they think there's a snake, and thus they hump the rocks? Are they trying to... fuck the snake? Why a snake? Why not pick up the rock to get to the snake? How frequently are guys doing this? Is this some weird cultural thing I'm unaware of? Is it only random horniness that causes snake-infested rock pile humping, or can non-random horniness induce rock humps? Do certain species of snakes cause this behavior more than others?
Though, to be fair, snake anthros are sexy as all get out![]()
I like the way you think!Well your question has kicked a hornets nest... maybe a horniest nest?
An expression I've heard commonly is that men will 'shag anything with a spine' but they're ruling out all the invertebrates, some of whom would give a fine BJ. Come to that, a vajayjay is much like one of our single-footed cousins.
I'm so happy for you!BAF and I have finally reconnected over the last mont
The historical argument is good. I tend to think the more significant shift is not so much between the hunter-gatherer culture, but between a society based on agriculture and crafts in which everyone engaged in a variety of tasks, and one based on industry and having a job which is often highly repetitive - e.g. sitting in a cubical and reviewing data. Agriculture still requires the skills NDs excel in to a high degree, especially when there is animal husbandry involved.A friend sent me a link to this article that suggests a different viewpoint on neurodiversity. 'What if Neurodivergence isn't the deviation?' What's your opinion on the idea?
Well, I recall reading about autism correlating with neanderthal genes. It could indeed be that large part of it is original that way. Neanferthals lived in smaller communities than the following human species.A friend sent me a link to this article that suggests a different viewpoint on neurodiversity. 'What if Neurodivergence isn't the deviation?' What's your opinion on the idea?
Ah yes, the Clemson and Loyola studies did show that there was a link between Neandertal DNA and the occurrence of Autism, but it seemed pretty nuanced. IIRC, it was something along the lines that one of the genetic triggers for autism is more commonly found in human DNA "borrowed" from our Neandertal ancestors making ASD more likely when the other genetic, etc., factors come into play. I thought it was a wonderful example of how complex ASD is as a condition, and of its ability to defy simple explanation.Well, I recall reading about autism correlating with neanderthal genes. It could indeed be that large part of it is original that way. Neanferthals lived in smaller communities than the following human species.
On the other hand, autism can occur by gene mutation. Those people apparently tend to have a more difficult case of autism, I suspect they don't usually have children.
My own pet theory about the rising rates of diagnosis is that modern society is very hostile to NDs of all descriptions. It is just that much more difficult for us to hide. In short, we have become more noticable, though I am not sure how that fits with level-3 autistics. This is why I am inclined to accept the historical argument made, but Autism is complex, and I am reluctant to accept any theory which seems too simple.Thanks both and anyone else is welcome to add further comment.
As I read it, my immediate question was 'what about level 3 autism?' How does that fit the tree-hugging hunter-gathering profile? To ignore that type of autism sounds like ableism.
The author doesn't come right out to suggest particular autistic traits have appeared from natural selection, but surely that can be deduced. If that were the case then how have 'deviant' NTs gained the upper hand to create a civilisation filled with challenges that the majority NDs find abhorrent? Or did the NTs take advantage of indigenous ND populations by brutally eradicating them, because they were unable to defend themselves?
The idea of cuddly, hobbity auties living at one with nature sounds whimsical to me - and the sepias of the accompanying illustration support that nostalgic fantasy. I'm not sure how walking into door frames compares to bumping into forest trees and scaring away your lunch! Sustained repetitive behaviour can be found in every agricultural practice: planting rice in paddy fields, threshing corn, cutting reeds for thatching - even the animal world is full of repetition.
The ideas outlined in the initial paragraphs were intriguing, but the cherry-picked list of traits reminded me of astrological star signs that suggest Capricorns are hard-working, reliable and faithful, while Aries are often narrow minded and pugnacious. I like the idea that NT could be a divergence, but this article doesn't convince me.
Same, same...What I love about this thread is that it isn’t political or pornographic![]()
Yes, they aren't really properly functional in any kind of society. But already level 2 could do more in agricultural society than in modern society (probably just labeled weird/stupid/eccentric). Not that it proves autism being "the original normal" in any way. Society used to be much easier for everyone.As I read it, my immediate question was 'what about level 3 autism?'
To my knowledge, the rates of level 3 autistics haven't risen since 80s. The main difference is with level 1 which was recognised late overall, and badly even much later.In short, we have become more noticable, though I am not sure how that fits with level-3 autistics.
Not only that, though. In themodern world my sensory sensitivities are a problem. However, my sensitive hearing also makes me musical and helps me learn languages - a definite advantage. Same with acute eyesight for colour tones, and there are others.It interferes with our ability to function within the confines of existing society,