EmilyMiller
May be triggering
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2022
- Posts
- 17,933
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NEXT you'll be claiming that it will be okay for them to remake the Highlander, obviously without Connery. Everybody knows tht there can only be one highlander, and it was Connery. Yes, I know technically Christopher Lambert was The Highlander, but Connery stole the movie and all that Lambert ended up with was being married to Diane Lane. Hey, not such a bad consolation prize...hmmmTeam Craig I’m afraid![]()
I feel very young suddenly.NEXT you'll be claiming that it will be okay for them to remake the Highlander, obviously without Connery. Everybody knows tht there can only be one highlander, and it was Connery. Yes, I know technically Christopher Lambert was The Highlander, but Connery stole the movie and all that Lambert ended up with was being married to Diane Lane. Hey, not such a bad consolation prize...hmmm
But, recasting Connery's role with Russell Crowe????![]()
And I'm feeling a little old.I feel very young suddenly.
you're welcomeI feel very young suddenly.

There was a recent event called "Pink Orchid" sponsored by @Omenainen that was all about female-centric erotica.Lit has lots of female centric stories.
Yes. That's correct.My opinion this might be slightly off but doesn't an author have to be able to write all kinds of characters to fill a story.
Thank you. My Pink Orchid story is doing quite well.Link for those who haven't seen it: https://tags.literotica.com/pink orchid/
Mine both did better than I thoughtThank you. My Pink Orchid story is doing quite well.
There was a recent event called "Pink Orchid" sponsored by @Omenainen that was all about female-centric erotica.
A lot of people fantasize about BDSM with no intention of actually doing it. The dominatrix with uncanny mind-reading ability, the sub with amazing stretchy holes - it's all part of an imaginary universe just like non-human porn. Occasionally people want to get it right, often by getting into the scene and trying it - which obviously isn't an option for writing characteristics you can't adopt!tons of people write BDSM without knowing much about it. Yet I don't see people agonizing over getting BDSM right, at least not to the degree that people agonize over getting the female experience right.
There's some, but there's a lot more hesitancy about trying it. Especially on Lit, where you have the Interracial category which mainly fetishises American Black vs White history, and any other story tends to stay well away even if it has characters of different races.I don't see people hand-wringing over accurately portraying races, either. Maybe some people do, but I have yet to come across a thread yet that's about "black centric stories" or whatever.
I'm on a few communities where authors can ask for advice. What's interesting is how many say they'd never try writing a different race, but blithely decide to set a story in a country they've never been to (almost invariably part of the UK or Ireland, though I think Japan and S Korea get the fan treatment now too). Possibly because they don't realise Europe isn't just the USA but speaking funny? They'll fret over a particular medical issue and how it's treated, but never consider that Brits don't major in anything at university, don't 'graduate' at 18, nor celebrate Thanksgiving...I think it's worth reflecting on why we care so much about accurately portraying the female experience over other experiences.
Unless they're slime girls.and we aren’t some homogenous blob,
This is also the case with cuckolding stories, which are slowly taking over almost every category, even though in reality it is one of the most dangerous fetishes.IAs pointed out by someone else in this forum (though I can't recall who), tons of people write BDSM without knowing much about it. Yet I don't see people agonizing over getting BDSM right, at least not to the degree that people agonize over getting the female experience right.
Why is it one of the most dangerous fetishes?This is also the case with cuckolding stories, which are slowly taking over almost every category, even though in reality it is one of the most dangerous fetishes.
Oh no, there are dozens of bwwm-stories on the bestseller lists where a billionaire, arrogantly handsome white man falls in love with a poor black girl.In mainstream publishing there's been angsting for some years about not enough black/ethnic minority authors, and pushes to encourage more, but often ending up with books that include only characters from those backgrounds.
As pointed out by someone else in this forum (though I can't recall who), tons of people write BDSM without knowing much about it.
I have no experience, but my heart and mind scream, "minefield."Why is it one of the most dangerous fetishes?
Without proper aftercare, it can cause lifelong mental trauma.Why is it one of the most dangerous fetishes?
I think bondage may be much more that way, but my sample size of one for C/HW ended up with HSV before she left him. Developed a weird reaction to it later too. We need a vaccine.Without proper aftercare, it can cause lifelong mental trauma.
EL James and Fifty Shades set BDSM back a long way.As pointed out by someone else in this forum (though I can't recall who), tons of people write BDSM without knowing much about it.
Dangerous to relationships. Cuck/Hotwife in real life is similar to swinging. It seems so hot in fantasy. Guy thinks seeing his wife with another man would be incredible until you're in that room and that guy's dick is in your wife's mouth. Wife can react badly and back out, or worse go through with it and feel like a cheap whore, husband could feel awful afterward, jealous, pissed off, or he can go off right there.Why is it one of the most dangerous fetishes?
Sorry, but that's just incorrect.In other ways men are incredibly complicated. But not when it comes to sex.
That sounds about right.12 pages in, and I still have no idea what "female centric" means.
This was pointless and a huge waste of my time to read.
It’s meaningless. It assumes women are a homogenous whole, not an agglomeration of disparate individuals.12 pages in, and I still have no idea what "female centric" means.