George Santos

[butters]

Over $9000 the Santos campaign’s financial filings claim were made to Donald Trump's re-election campaign and local GOP groups never appeared, "and may not have been donated," according to Politico.

"The purported donations included $2,800 to Trump's campaign that isn't reflected in his campaign finance disclosures — and would have exceeded contribution limits if it did happen as Santos' campaign reported it."

the majority of the dodgy reportings appear from 2019-2020, with later donations largely accounted for though there were exceptions... like the $2,000 supposedly donated in 2021 to Blake Masters, "though Santos' disclosure listed a nonexistent Florida address for Masters' campaign."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...pc=U531&cvid=2e35f5fa30314e42ba814733f144944e

how much is santos dipping into the pot, how much is down to the sticky fingers of others he hired, and how much is purely terrible accounting by the inexperienced or, worse yet, deliberately bad accounting by those who DID know what they were doing, is yet to be decided. There clearly seems an established pattern of fraudulent behaviour on the part of santos given his past history.

 

[HisArpy]

True, people can believe what they want, even trumps bullshit. But I think it's irresponsible and even dangerous for the POTUS to stir up his base and point them at the capital building. Democracy held, but it was strained.


Really, your reading comprehension skills kind of suck. I never claimed he wasn't a billionaire, I said he wasn't a self-made one. Big difference.


There you go again.


I do believe a couple of claims or so were denied on technicalities, like trumps team D lawyers missing deadlines or writing things up wrong. But once they did get before a judge they couldn't claim fraud (like they did on front of the porn shop) because they, get this!, had no evidence!

Seems like I recall they found some evidence of irregularities such as voting more than once on the republican side of things, so maybe that was the AZ irregularity. Even if not, they decided whatever the irregularity was it wouldn't make a difference.


If there was any there there it would be before the courts, right?


FFS, you think that lying asshole will come up with the righteous truth that will set us all free?


I'll bite. Since you don't believe your own eyes and ears, what lies by omission and fabrication did the J6 committee commit?

What you seem to believe has little to do with actual events. You'd do better to research your talking points before you make them, or at least have the grace to admit you didn't and are taking the narrative you've been fed at face value.

FWIW, almost every one of Trump's challenges to the election were dismissed on procedural grounds (usually standing). You can googlyeye search on that if you want, but it's the truth.

The rest of what you post is in the same vein, you take the narrative at face value rather than research what really happened. Worse, your "recall" isn't as good as you think it is. I also believe that you know this, or should know this, and when you rely on it to the level you do, you're being derelict in your obligation to yourself.

 

[Inthesewalls]

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-courts-election-idUSKBN2AF1G1

how the fuck are people still arguing about the election? This is reuters thorough breakdown with links to evidence. All of it states no evidence is upheld in every case listed here in more than 50 lawsuits. Nowhere is there any procedural things listed. If this is as widespread as you think it is, why did not one of those 50 lawsuits go through?

And before you whine it was all techinicalities next time- you might want google something that isnt fox news. Also you might want to think about how monumentally stupid it makes Republicans look that they couldnt prove anything on something apparently so wide spread and common. While I am on board with that message- are you trying to give the us more ammunition? You are waving a flag that says we were owned by the libs on something this big. Something that should be so simple to prove.

Are you saying that republicans are that incompetant, that stupid, that they cant prove one lawsuit or one bit of evidence in 50 cases? Are all republican lawyers stupid? Incompetent? Is that what you really want to argue? Are the republicans that hired them similarly impared? Those are the people you want to argue should run things? I mean the whole US they had to find proof. Yet nothing. Can you really justify 50 seperate times?

You can reply. Im not going to respond cause its pretty simple to look at paperwork. Use common sense and find a new cause.

 

[phrodeau]

https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2...p-a-family-friend-charged-with-fraud-00084341

Audio has been released of George Santos lying to a judge, when he appeared on behalf of his criminal roommate.

 

[jomar]

What you seem to believe has little to do with actual events. You'd do better to research your talking points before you make them, or at least have the grace to admit you didn't and are taking the narrative you've been fed at face value.

FWIW, almost every one of Trump's challenges to the election were dismissed on procedural grounds (usually standing). You can googlyeye search on that if you want, but it's the truth.

Sure thing there Mr. Opinions Based on Fact Analysis.

According to the Washington Post here , instead of alleging “widespread fraud or election-changing conspiracy” the lawsuits pushed by Trump’s team and allies focused on smaller complaints, which were largely dismissed by judges due to a lack of evidence. “The Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their assertions — just speculation, rumors or hearsay.”

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-...aud-presented-by-trump-campaign-idUSKBN2AF1G1

I almost feel embarrassed for you.

The rest of what you post is in the same vein, you take the narrative at face value rather than research what really happened. Worse, your "recall" isn't as good as you think it is. I also believe that you know this, or should know this, and when you rely on it to the level you do, you're being derelict in your obligation to yourself.

Sure thing there Mr. Lame Insulter.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-courts-election-idUSKBN2AF1G1

how the fuck are people still arguing about the election? This is reuters thorough breakdown with links to evidence. All of it states no evidence is upheld in every case listed here in more than 50 lawsuits. Nowhere is there any procedural things listed. If this is as widespread as you think it is, why did not one of those 50 lawsuits go through?

And before you whine it was all techinicalities next time- you might want google something that isnt fox news. Also you might want to think about how monumentally stupid it makes Republicans look that they couldnt prove anything on something apparently so wide spread and common. While I am on board with that message- are you trying to give the us more ammunition? You are waving a flag that says we were owned by the libs on something this big. Something that should be so simple to prove.

Are you saying that republicans are that incompetant, that stupid, that they cant prove one lawsuit or one bit of evidence in 50 cases? Are all republican lawyers stupid? Incompetent? Is that what you really want to argue? Are the republicans that hired them similarly impared? Those are the people you want to argue should run things? I mean the whole US they had to find proof. Yet nothing. Can you really justify 50 seperate times?

You can reply. Im not going to respond cause its pretty simple to look at paperwork. Use common sense and find a new cause.

After a while here, you will just laugh at the Fox news nuts. No sense trying to change their views, instead sit back and enjoy laughing at their stupidity!

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1630385351041875968

 

[icanhelp1]

rotflmao. Almost everyone on this board wears partisan blinkers. Look at all the accusations of Trump and Santos lying whilst completely ignoring the current liar-in-chief, who only opens its mouth to spout gibberish or new lies on top of the old. And that's just one little bit of obviousness.

As for everything else, well, this entire board is pure entertainment and I'd like to congratulate everyone for keeping a straight face (me excepted, I snort my coffee every time I'm here, infallibly). I mean, the whole denial that Trump will be the 2024 GOP candidate. Come on, face it. He's going to win. And then he's going to win the election, because besides the senile, dementia-ridden old fart, who else do the Democrats have? Everything that Biden has touched has turned into a fuckup, and we still haven't seen him in Ohio. Reality is, almost everything Trump touched was a success. And will be again after 2024, followed, naturally, by 8 years of President DeSantis.

Let’s just imagine Michelle Obama. That could be a nightmare scenario for pubs.

 

[Pad_Foot]

rotflmao. Almost everyone on this board wears partisan blinkers. Look at all the accusations of Trump and Santos lying whilst completely ignoring the current liar-in-chief, who only opens its mouth to spout gibberish or new lies on top of the old. And that's just one little bit of obviousness.

As for everything else, well, this entire board is pure entertainment and I'd like to congratulate everyone for keeping a straight face (me excepted, I snort my coffee every time I'm here, infallibly). I mean, the whole denial that Trump will be the 2024 GOP candidate. Come on, face it. He's going to win. And then he's going to win the election, because besides the senile, dementia-ridden old fart, who else do the Democrats have? Everything that Biden has touched has turned into a fuckup, and we still haven't seen him in Ohio. Reality is, almost everything Trump touched was a success. And will be again after 2024, followed, naturally, by 8 years of President DeSantis.

Bye Chloe... I won't be seeing your little tidbits of insight into the right's brain misfunction anymore.
I should check out your stories though.......

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Let’s just imagine Michelle Obama. That could be a nightmare scenario for pubs.

I'm thinking you've imagined her a lot while pulling your pud.....*chuckles*

 

[Dribble]

Plead guilty for fraud in Brazil. Now...why would a dude plead guilty for crimes in another country if he didn't do it? A true Republican patriot

 

[Pad_Foot]

I'm thinking you've imagined her a lot while pulling your pud.....*chuckles*

Well? It is a porn site and she writes porn

 

[jaF0]

Incoming ......

Rep. George Santos charged by federal prosecutors in New York​

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/www.msn.com.icoABC on MSN.com|13 minutes ago
Rep. George Santos has been charged by federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of New York, according to sources familiar with the matter. The charges remain under seal so the nature of the allegations is currently unclear.

GOP Rep. George Santos hit with criminal charges by Justice Department: CNN​

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/www.businessinsider.com.icoBusiness Insider|11 minutes ago
The Justice Department filed criminal charges against Rep. George Santos, CNN reported. It's unclear what the charges were.

Long Island Congressman George Santos charged by U.S. Justice Department​

https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/ip3/abc7ny.com.icoabc7NY|14 minutes ago
Long Island Congressman George Santos has been charged by the U.S. Department of Justice. Santos has been charged by federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of New York, according to sources familiar with the matter,

 

[RoryN]

Report: to be arrested tomorrow.

 

[RoryN]

13 counts: fraud, money laundering, theft...

Probably will lose his seat to a Democrat.

https://abc7ny.com/george-santos-charged-charges-indictment-congress/13229821/

 

[coati]

13 counts: fraud, money laundering, theft...

Probably will lose his seat to a Democrat.

Maybe not. As the real President of the U.S., he does have the power to pardon himself.

This is the second biggest witch hunt in world history.

 

[jaF0]

"“Taken together, the allegations in the indictment charge Santos with relying on repeated dishonesty and deception to ascend to the halls of Congress and enrich himself,” Peace said in a statement. “He used political contributions to line his pockets, unlawfully applied for unemployment benefits that should have gone to New Yorkers who had lost their jobs due to the pandemic, and lied to the House of Representatives.” "

https://www.courthousenews.com/from-congress-to-federal-court-santos-arrested-on-13-criminal-counts/

.

 

[jaF0]

^^^ One who consistently types the way you do should not be accusing others of stupidity.

 

[Dribble]

Just leafed through the charges...very solid. Should be extremely easy to prove or disprove. The boy should head back to Brazil and pick up his old tranny lifestyle. He will be much much happier

 

[RoryN]

Ten levels of stupid right here...

McCarthy stands by Santos: https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/george-santos-federal-charges-05-10-23/index.html

 

[RoryN]

From the "you can't make this shit up" department: Rep. George Santos, who is charged with fraudulently applying for Covid-related unemployment benefits, is a co-sponsor of a bill that would help states recoup fraudulent Covid unemployment benefits.

 

[snailspace]

In six months the feds found all this on santos in six years they found nothing on the biden kid

 

[Dribble]

What a purty mouth he got...

 

[RoryN]

In six months the feds found all this on santos in six years they found nothing on the biden kid

Right.

And the logical, non-batshit-MAGA conclusion to that analysis is...

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1656320284620894208