KRCummings
Uh...
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2004
- Posts
- 76,511
So in that he is clearly saying that FMJ is not anti-war and that he doesn't think war is all bad yet you insist he and the movie were anti-war. How the fuck to you get that?Like with most things we can agree to disagree. You can draw your own conclusions form this:
In an interview with Kubrick in the Chicago Tribune, he states…
Yet to view ``Full Metal Jacket`` as an antiwar film is too simplistic, Kubrick said. ``I guess that`s what the producer of `Platoon` said in his Oscar speech—that he hoped they had made a film to end all wars.
``But there may be a fallacy in antiwar films that showing people war is bad will make them less willing to fight a war,`` Kubrick said. `` `Full Metal Jacket` suggests that there is more to say about war than it is just bad.
`The Vietnam war was, of course, horribly wrong from the start, but I think it may have taught us something valuable. We would probably be fighting now in Nicaragua had it not been for Vietnam. I think the message has certainly gotten through that you don`t even begin to think about fighting a war unless your survival depends upon it. Fancy theories about falling dominoes won`t do in the future.``
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/.../8702160471_1_kubrick-full-metal-jacket-joker
