Stop fucking Republicans

[lovecraft68]

Knuckle draggers deserve tolerance as well...

Okay, let me show some, and give you some good advice.

Rule of thumb, when you need to put Alpha in your name, you're proclaiming yourself as anything but.

Follows the "The ones who say the most do the least" theory.

You can find these and more fun tips in the cold male insecurity handbook.

"Yeah, I'd tie her up and fuck her holes"

Translates to "I read about this stuff and wish I could do it, but no one knows me here so I can keyboard dom with the best of them!"

Peace out, Mr. KD

 

[seekingAlpha]

Okay, let me show some, and give you some good advice.

Rule of thumb, when you need to put Alpha in your name, you're proclaiming yourself as anything but.

Follows the "The ones who say the most do the least" theory.

You can find these and more fun tips in the cold male insecurity handbook.

"Yeah, I'd tie her up and fuck her holes"

Translates to "I read about this stuff and wish I could do it, but no one knows me here so I can keyboard dom with the best of them!"

Peace out, Mr. KD

Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, or Narcissism are not requirements to respond to a post.

We know that diversity can sometimes be more uncomfortable because things are less familiar – but it gets the best results.
~ Megan Smith

 

[IrisAlthea]

Anyone who takes this seriously enough to say they'd never be with someone because of a differing view is in actuality, the type of person no one should ever want to be with.

Yes, what a strange idea - wanting a partner who shares your basic values, or at least doesn’t hold any that are going to be harmful for you.

 

[Goldenfinger]

Yes, what a strange idea - wanting a partner who shares your basic values, or at least doesn’t hold any that are going to be harmful for you.

I try not to deal in absolutes. I like taller women, I’m 6’4” tall and wouldn’t was to go shorter than 5’6” but it’s not a deal breaker. A lot of people share basic values it’s getting there that’s different.

 

[PaxNurgle]

There's differing views and there is unreasonable views.

If people believe something to be true despite all evidence (and proof) that it is not, then that is not a reasonable view. For instance, debating with someone who argues that the Bengals actually won the Super Bowl, that the Holocaust didn't happen, and that Trump was the rightful winner of the 2020 election- those are not reasonable views (as they have been proven false) and therefore are not worthy of respect.

Believing that certain groups of people ought to have their rights taken away, or that discrimination against certain ethnic or religious groups is okay, or that violence toward said groups is acceptable- those are not reasonable views either. Not worth respect, or debate.

There are people on this board with whom I disagree with, with which I can have really interesting (and sometimes enlightening) discussions. And there are those who I cannot; simply because either their views or unreasonable/unacceptable, or they cannot argue intelligently without blatant trolling/namecalling. And that is true even of relationships.

However, one practical thing to add, since this IS a sex-related topic, is that I may not be sexually compatible with someone who is extremely socially conservative. They may believe that anything other than vanilla missionary position sex is sinful or shameful. Or, that ANY sex, without the explicit goal of procreation, is sinful/shameful. No cunnilingus/cock sucking or anal (that's sodomy) and sure as heck no BDSM (submitting to a woman is against the teachings of Paul in the Bible) I could not be with a woman like that for the simple reason- we are not compatible sexually. Regardless of other beliefs.

 

[Goldenfinger]

There's differing views and there is unreasonable views.

If people believe something to be true despite all evidence (and proof) that it is not, then that is not a reasonable view. For instance, debating with someone who argues that the Bengals actually won the Super Bowl, that the Holocaust didn't happen, and that Trump was the rightful winner of the 2020 election- those are not reasonable views (as they have been proven false) and therefore are not worthy of respect.

Believing that certain groups of people ought to have their rights taken away, or that discrimination against certain ethnic or religious groups is okay, or that violence toward said groups is acceptable- those are not reasonable views either. Not worth respect, or debate.

There are people on this board with whom I disagree with, with which I can have really interesting (and sometimes enlightening) discussions. And there are those who I cannot; simply because either their views or unreasonable/unacceptable, or they cannot argue intelligently without blatant trolling/namecalling. And that is true even of relationships.

However, one practical thing to add, since this IS a sex-related topic, is that I may not be sexually compatible with someone who is extremely socially conservative. They may believe that anything other than vanilla missionary position sex is sinful or shameful. Or, that ANY sex, without the explicit goal of procreation, is sinful/shameful. No cunnilingus/cock sucking or anal (that's sodomy) and sure as heck no BDSM (submitting to a woman is against the teachings of Paul in the Bible) I could not be with a woman like that for the simple reason- we are not compatible sexually. Regardless of other beliefs.

Not all conservatives are religious. Not all democrats are atheist. People are complicated and don’t neatly fit into one box.

 

[IrisAlthea]

A lot of people share basic values it’s getting there that’s different.

Not all conservatives are religious. Not all democrats are atheist. People are complicated and don’t neatly fit into one box.

Oh, I agree that it is not about conservatism or religion - as I’ve said earlier in the thread, for me it is about peoples values.

Lately where I live, there are ex party leaders who denounce their old party for supporting and enabling a populist party with values that are beyond the pale in my opinion. Others are working to overthrow party leadership to get back to their previous stance on these issues.
They are quite fuckable(if otherwise fuckable), perhaps even more than before because standing up for what they believe even when it is not convenient is a plus in my book.

I try not to deal in absolutes. I like taller women, I’m 6’4” tall and wouldn’t was to go shorter than 5’6” but it’s not a deal breaker

And this leads me to another issue I have with what lovecraft posted:
It is quite ok in my opinion to consider someone not interesting as a sex partner, for any reason (general) you choose, because noone is entitled to being considered fuckable.

 

[Primalex]

This thread reminds me of the guys who say they'd never have sex with a woman who has 'disfigured herself' with tattoos and you know damn well they would if they had the chance.

Do we? Or are you merely projecting your own hypocritical thoughts and lack of standards when it comes to putting your dick into holes?

The Internet is full of people who got dumped for getting a tattoo.

As for the topic in general, pre judging someone with any of their beliefs and saying "all this and all that" is every type of ist and phobe on full display.

"pre judging someone with any of their beliefs" - This doesn't even make sense. I'm not "prejudging" someone when I find that persons view abhorrent or when that person supports a party which has abhorrent views about how people should live. I judge this person directly. What you really want to say is:"I have abhorrent views, but don't judge me for it, just look how I'm otherwise a 'nice guy'".

Pardon me for my ability to think for myself

You are not thinking. You can't even control your "leftists bad!" drivel here.

 

[lovecraft68]

Other than tweaking the fragile egos of the cyber doms here, I'll say this in seriousness.

Congratulations everyone, you have now politicized sex and turned it into another thing to judge people by.

Another example of how the 'tolerant' left is the true party of hatred and prejudice, and in every way.

Good job from a centrist who is tired of both sides and their shit, but more so of the preachy self righteous squealing of the 'progressives who are in reality nothing but regressive.

And so another cult of indoctrination is born of lemmings, hate mongers and fear mongers.

 

[IrisAlthea]

Another example of how the 'tolerant' left is the true party of hatred and prejudice, and in every way.

Eh, no.
Choosing not to have sex with someone because they want to influence the world in a way that makes it more hostile to you, is in not witholding or obstructing any of their rights.

 

[Diosax]

I did not expect this thread to be so controversial.

 

[PaxNurgle]

Eh, no.
Choosing not to have sex with someone because they want to influence the world in a way that makes it more hostile to you, is in not witholding or obstructing any of their rights.

This is perfectly stated.

It's one thing to respect others opinions, but you are not required to share these opinions- or share intimacy with them.
Especially if, as you stated, they believe that the role of government is to force others to adapt their lifestyle and live by their beliefs. Or to make the world a darker, less free and more hostile place for you.

 

[seekingAlpha]

Other than tweaking the fragile egos of the cyber doms here, I'll say this in seriousness.

Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, or Narcissism are once again not requirements to respond to a post.

 

[ToPleaseHim]

Other than tweaking the fragile egos of the cyber doms here, I'll say this in seriousness.

Congratulations everyone, you have now politicized sex and turned it into another thing to judge people by.

Are you suggesting that just now, because of this thread, people will judge others’ based on politics or sexual proclivities? I hadn’t pegged you as that naive…

Another example of how the 'tolerant' left is the true party of hatred and prejudice, and in every way.

Good job from a centrist who is tired of both sides and their shit, but more so of the preachy self righteous squealing of the 'progressives who are in reality nothing but regressive.

And so another cult of indoctrination is born of lemmings, hate mongers and fear mongers.

Sign me up for Primalex’s cult, though

 

[IrisAlthea]

I'm going to need those first two terms explained to me.

Machiavellianism is named after Machiavelli, who wrote The Prince, arguing that a ruler must put the goals before the means and ethics or possibly doing a satire about political behaviour.
It’s actually a good read and still very relevant despite being several centuries old.

Psychopathy is a poorly defined and debated term describing a condition where a person lacks empathy, remorse, inhibition.

 

[Primalex]

Good job from a centrist

You are not a centrist.

And so another cult of indoctrination is born of lemmings, hate mongers and fear mongers.

"Lemmings" ...didn't know that this is "centrist speech".

You rant about indoctrination and at the same time believe that "Democrats is the party of pedos!" vs. "Stop school shootings!", the latter is hate mongering.

 

[SheisFaye]

Neverrrrr!

 

[drobert44]

Now here’s a statement I fully support! My kind of Dominant

Question for discussion: can political standpoints be a kink or fetish? I wonder if some prefer to submit to someone who isn’t aligned with them, someone whose viewpoints actually actively harm them. Is this a type of masochism?

I am a conservative guy, went to Montreal x 4 to be with a Liberal lady.........we argued a bit, but both respected each other. We chat almost daily, why would anyone let politics ruin a friendship?

 

[ToPleaseHim]

I am a conservative guy, went to Montreal x 4 to be with a Liberal lady.........we argued a bit, but both respected each other. We chat almost daily, why would anyone let politics ruin a friendship?

I think it comes down to what one considers “politics.” I won’t spend one minute with someone who is opposed to basic fundamental human rights or who actively supports legislation that harms people I love. That’s not “politics” to me.

 

[drobert44]

I think it comes down to what one considers “politics.” I won’t spend one minute with someone who is opposed to basic fundamental human rights or who actively supports legislation that harms people I love. That’s not “politics” to me.

Exactly........years ago, in school, the prof told us what really counts, especially in a system of government, is preserving the dignity of the individual.......I never lost track of that.

 

[Goldenfinger]

I think it comes down to what one considers “politics.” I won’t spend one minute with someone who is opposed to basic fundamental human rights or who actively supports legislation that harms people I love. That’s not “politics” to me.

What do you call basic fundamental human rights?

 

[Primalex]

I am a conservative guy, went to Montreal x 4 to be with a Liberal lady.........we argued a bit, but both respected each other. We chat almost daily, why would anyone let politics ruin a friendship?

Is the thread title:"Stop fucking conservative guys"?

What do you call basic fundamental human rights?

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

 

[Goldenfinger]

Is the thread title:"Stop fucking conservative guys"?



https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights

thanks for the link. I am well aware of the UNs declaration of human rights. But that is not the question I asked.

 

[traill]

It does answer rather perfectly by specific articles and a specific standard what fundamental human rights are.

 

[IrisAlthea]

What do you call basic fundamental human rights?

For me, the first issue is not the ”rights” part but how inclusive their concept of
”human” is.