The Trump Davos speech.

I respectfully request you contact the Literotica administrators and submit your concerns. They can further investigate your (false) accusation and determine (to the extent) possible that I am a banned user. They are free to contact me at their convenience.

If you elect not to pursue this action, I respectfully request you plug your pie hole on the matter. Put action to words.
Not concerned at all.
You're hiding and blaming me for it.
 
Yeah, right...? A woman couldn't remotely provide an articulate response. Sooo, I must be a dude, who was previously banned. Is that the sum of your (and others) accusation...?

Well, you're a force to be reckoned here, and with knowledge of past yet banned users, who do you think I am...?
If he can sell that bag of tripe then, at least in his mind, everything you've posted is invalidated. And please be advised, he was one of the stars of the "Hollywood Psychics" boiler room. :cool:
 
If he can sell that bag of tripe then, at least in his mind, everything you've posted is invalidated. And please be advised, he was one of the stars of the "Hollywood Psychics" boiler room.
I'm not the one making a new username after being banned.
 
The left field "feel" to this approach is that most Americans are totally unaware of just how constrained the nation's access and supply to critical minerals actually are. If those get curtailed (or worst - shut down), the American economic engine will falter and fail (not might) - if China has no qualms about dumping T-bills to the detriment of its own economy, restraining critical resources to hurt America is a no brainer. Of course, Trump isn't going to headline this fact because it represents a weakness, and why reveal that publicly to your competitors (they'll only use the weakness against your negotiating position or move to make it happen)?

The current shortage of rare earth minerals in America is primarily due to the ignorance of one Donald J. Trump, beginning in 2016. That was the year that the world in general recognized that electric vehicles were more than a fad, but to achieve world prominence you'd need access to major deposits of both lithium and cobalt (the two most prominent "rare earths") which are the primary components of electric car batteries.

Nations friendly towards the United States strongly urged the US to lock up existing reserves of these minerals. The State Department not-so-nicely declined. If something didn't have to do with petrochemical extraction and/or refining, the USA was categorically NOT INTERESTED.

This allowed China to go on an unprecedented buying spree, essentially locking up virtually every rare earth reserve in the world (primarily Africa) leaving the Ukraine, Greenland and Russia as the "last frontiers".

Russia invaded Ukraine almost exclusively for their Lithium reserves, which exist in the Donbas region of Ukraine. You might recall Putin claiming he'd end the hostilities with Ukraine if they ceded control over Donbas to Russia. Conicidence?

Anyway the Chinese locked up the rest of the world. President Joe Biden was able to unravel roughly 30% of the territorial claims of China for these minerals, but the bottom line is that Lithium is now about 10 percent more expensive on the world market due to the cluelessness of Donald J. Trump, who clung to the "drill babby drill" trope long after it became obsolete.



And in the interim, China has taken a commanding lead in the electronic vehicle market, mainly because they use extraordinarily simple designs...modular EVs made of 8 components, if something breaks, you remove the component and replace it within an hour and you're back on the road.



The huge advantage that China has is that, unlike every other manufacturer in the world, the clunky Chinese car is specifically engineered for cold climates. Teslas seem to struggle with temperatures below freezing. Chinese EVs start reliably at temperatures well below zero....and guess what? Those temperatures are quite common in Russia and eastern Europe.



With Russia's reserves "off limits" and Ukraine's reserves the current prize in a shooting war, Greenland is the lowest hanging fruit left. And that's why "master negotiator Trump" is threatening the economy of the world with his ham-handed 'gimme gimme gimme" childishness.
 
From AI:
As of all credible sources and records, there is no verified evidence or credible report that Donald Trump ever called World War II veterans “losers and suckers.”


This claim appears to be a false or misleading rumor that circulated, but fact-checkers and reliable news outlets have found no proof he made such a statement.
Elon's software is a source?
Witnesses in the military listening to him denigrate the military were the sources.
 
Somebody told me something once... What was it...?

Oh, right!

"Not concerned at all. You're [asking] and blaming me for it."

As "fun" as this has been, I'm leaving my super secret office (of banned Literotica users) and driving a 1½ hour commute to my disgusting and sickening lair.

Please do enjoy the rest of a dutifulrose-free evening, peeps!
Always fun to see banned users who come back and can't admit their banning.

At least you're not alone
 
Duuude 😲 Do you want to tweek your response (just wee bit) lest you look the fool...? I give you - The Religion of Peace.
I see no need to "tweek" anything. I stand behind my position one hundred percent, your random Islamophobic website notwithstanding.

I am of the opinion that America faces more threats to freedom of speech from Christian nationalists, as well as Islamophobic religious bigots (like Bill Ackman's attempts to have any criticism of genocidal Israel declared to be legally sanctionable "hate speech" and "antisemitism").

Far more innocent women and children died at the hands of "God's Chosen People" last year than by the "Religion of Peace".

and as a side note, you're far too old to be calling someone "Duuuude".
 
From AI:
As of all credible sources and records, there is no verified evidence or credible report that Donald Trump ever called World War II veterans “losers and suckers.”


This claim appears to be a false or misleading rumor that circulated, but fact-checkers and reliable news outlets have found no proof he made such a statement.
From NBC news:
John Kelly confirms Trump privately disparaged U.S. service members and veterans
Trump called fallen soldiers "suckers” and "losers" during his presidency, according to a 2020 report in The Atlantic.
 
From NBC news:
John Kelly confirms Trump privately disparaged U.S. service members and veterans
Trump called fallen soldiers "suckers” and "losers" during his presidency, according to a 2020 report in The Atlantic.

Not good enough…

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Hel_Books said:
From NBC news:
John Kelly confirms Trump privately disparaged U.S. service members and veterans
Trump called fallen soldiers "suckers” and "losers" during his presidency, according to a 2020 report in The Atlantic.

Not good enough…

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
From the Independent:

Donald Trump’s longest-serving Chief of Staff has confirmed remarks made and previously denied by the former president, in which he branded wounded or killed US war heroes as “losers” and “suckers”.

General John Kelly, who served the Trump administration from 2017 until 2019, confirmed details of a damning 2020 article in The Atlantic as well as other offensive remarks made by Mr Trump while he was president.

The article, written by Jeffrey Goldberg, claimed that Mr Trump refused to visit the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018 as it would ruin his hair, and did not understand the value of honouring the US war dead.

According to sources from the article, he said: “Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers.” At the time Mr Trump dismissed the story as “fake” and that he considered the fallen “absolute heroes”.

But in a statement to CNN, Mr Kelly confirmed several details of the story on the record and said the former president was unable to understand why the American public held respect for former prisoners of war and those shot down in combat. . . .
 
From the Independent:

Donald Trump’s longest-serving Chief of Staff has confirmed remarks made and previously denied by the former president, in which he branded wounded or killed US war heroes as “losers” and “suckers”.

General John Kelly, who served the Trump administration from 2017 until 2019, confirmed details of a damning 2020 article in The Atlantic as well as other offensive remarks made by Mr Trump while he was president.

The article, written by Jeffrey Goldberg, claimed that Mr Trump refused to visit the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018 as it would ruin his hair, and did not understand the value of honouring the US war dead.

According to sources from the article, he said: “Why should I go to that cemetery? It’s filled with losers.” At the time Mr Trump dismissed the story as “fake” and that he considered the fallen “absolute heroes”.


But in a statement to CNN, Mr Kelly confirmed several details of the story on the record and said the former president was unable to understand why the American public held respect for former prisoners of war and those shot down in combat. . . .

Not good enough…

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Well, nice straw man argument, but before we start, please speak English.

What war(s) are you claiming that non-Americans died defending the United States? Again, I acknowledge about 2,100 Frenchmen died during the American Revolution, but who are these others? You did use the plural - allies
You keep proving what an uninformed pedophile lover you are.

Have you been locked in the stupid box for the last 2 decades?
 
Not good enough…

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
That's not a debating technique, snowflake. If you think those news reports are erroneous, state your reasons why. Otherwise, we'll go with:

“What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” - Christopher Hitchens.
 
Well, nice straw man argument, but before we start, please speak English.

What war(s) are you claiming that non-Americans died defending the United States? Again, I acknowledge about 2,100 Frenchmen died during the American Revolution, but who are these others? You did use the plural - allies
I seem to recall a lot of Aussies, Kiwis and Britishers fighting alongside you folks against the Japanese in WWII. You might remember the Bridge on the River Kwai movie, if you aren't into reading books.
 
That's not a debating technique, snowflake. If you think those news reports are erroneous, state your reasons why. Otherwise, we'll go with:

“What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” - Christopher Hitchens.

🙄

Um, I was mocking the MAGAts with both posts.

As in: Having verification from the man himself (John Kelly) is NOT good enough for the MAGAts…

😑

Hope that ^ helps…

👍

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
I may have been wrong in assuming II74 was referring to the War on Terror. But since terror is everywhere, he may have been mistaken in thinking those deaths were just for us. The truth is, even in the absence of a "coalition of the willing," we would have gone into Iraq and Afghanistan alone. That's what the Bush administration was hell-bent on doing. That isn't me agreeing with it.
The Iraq invasion was a mistake, but that's a debatable point. The latest saber-rattling over invading Greenland (Or is it Iceland? Trump seems a bit shaky on the distinction. Sundowning?) is just weird.
 
On September 12, 2001, NATO invoked Article 5—its collective defence clause—for the first and only time, rallying all member nations to support the United States after the 9/11 attacks.

618308516_1356460106514982_6790910153064628730_n.jpg
 
The current shortage of rare earth minerals in America is primarily due to the ignorance of one Donald J. Trump, beginning in 2016. That was the year that the world in general recognized that electric vehicles were more than a fad, but to achieve world prominence you'd need access to major deposits of both lithium and cobalt (the two most prominent "rare earths") which are the primary components of electric car batteries.

Nations friendly towards the United States strongly urged the US to lock up existing reserves of these minerals. The State Department not-so-nicely declined. If something didn't have to do with petrochemical extraction and/or refining, the USA was categorically NOT INTERESTED.

This allowed China to go on an unprecedented buying spree, essentially locking up virtually every rare earth reserve in the world (primarily Africa) leaving the Ukraine, Greenland and Russia as the "last frontiers".

Russia invaded Ukraine almost exclusively for their Lithium reserves, which exist in the Donbas region of Ukraine. You might recall Putin claiming he'd end the hostilities with Ukraine if they ceded control over Donbas to Russia. Conicidence?

Anyway the Chinese locked up the rest of the world. President Joe Biden was able to unravel roughly 30% of the territorial claims of China for these minerals, but the bottom line is that Lithium is now about 10 percent more expensive on the world market due to the cluelessness of Donald J. Trump, who clung to the "drill babby drill" trope long after it became obsolete.



And in the interim, China has taken a commanding lead in the electronic vehicle market, mainly because they use extraordinarily simple designs...modular EVs made of 8 components, if something breaks, you remove the component and replace it within an hour and you're back on the road.



The huge advantage that China has is that, unlike every other manufacturer in the world, the clunky Chinese car is specifically engineered for cold climates. Teslas seem to struggle with temperatures below freezing. Chinese EVs start reliably at temperatures well below zero....and guess what? Those temperatures are quite common in Russia and eastern Europe.



With Russia's reserves "off limits" and Ukraine's reserves the current prize in a shooting war, Greenland is the lowest hanging fruit left. And that's why "master negotiator Trump" is threatening the economy of the world with his ham-handed 'gimme gimme gimme" childishness.

Succinct, well written and convincing.

China has made hay whilst the west watched, too busy with culture wars and the incessant election cycles.
 
So, you may agree or disagree on the bits and pieces or even the whole enchilada, buuut - you can't claim Trump isnt putting America's (and by extension - the world's) interests first. This isn't senility, racism, or even just being a meany driving the Greenland push (as much as some feign it is). It's sound business practice.
*golf clap*

That is some fine boolshit slinging there dutifulrose. Your art of the deal businessman, whose ghost writer is ashamed btw, is nakedly lining his pockets. Meanwhile, what about affordability and the Epstein files.
 
Back
Top