What kicks you out of a story.

I certainly think if you're writing you've got to write for yourself mostly. But there are some trends that people might keep in mind while writing.
And let's be honest, there's probably at least one lurker who is eagerly scribbling notes on good ways to trigger readers, thinking, "Ooh, I haven't tried a snot fetish yet!" (for example)
 
And let's be honest, there's probably at least one lurker who is eagerly scribbling notes on good ways to trigger readers, thinking, "Ooh, I haven't tried a snot fetish yet!" (for example)
Two other questions related to the OP question, but from a writer's perspective, might be:

What would you like to put in a story that you're afraid would put people off.

What, if someone whinged about it, would you put in more of.

I imagine any of us who have written erotica have thought about both these things have thought about these things. If I put something in a story and someone gives me crap about it, you'd better believe I'm leaning into it for the next story.
 
Exposition, especially at the very opening of a tale. I find it awkward and lazy. A huge wall of text which substitutes for actually showing where the story is taking place, the characters, or anything else of interest.
Right. If it’s a murder mystery, let’s see the body.
If it’s a sex story, let’s see some bodies!
 
Misspelled words, wrong words - "hoar" vs. "whore", for instance - bad punctuation, and bad grammar will send me dashing for the exits. Unrealistic dialog is also one. Oh... if I get to the bottom of the first page and see >10 pages remaining, I'm out. I'm good with chapters, but one humongous read without known breakpoints, no thanks.

Truthfully, I don't spend much LitE time reading stories, just writing, and reading/writing about writing in the forum here. So aside from skipping certain genres altogether knowing they're not my cup o' tea, I can't put my finger on content that would cause me to bail.
 
-"She looked exactly like [porn star/female celebrity]"
-Characters who act like the author has no idea how humans think or behave



I'd argue that while it's a cliché, this is a real thing. Think of a penis like a tire: it can be fully inflated, but you can still keep pumping it up to increase the pressure.
Like some fantasy sword, where the more it cuts, the sharper it gets?
 
I'm actually reading something now that feels really klunky, and I'm wondering if the author is having a rough spot, or if I'm seeing that they aren't as good of an author as I previously thought, even though I've read works of theirs before that I enjoyed.
I can't be the only writer here wondering whether you're referring to me...
"Ooh, I haven't tried a snot fetish yet!" (for example)
Got this covered: https://literotica.com/s/the-rivals-ch-03-the-demon-hunt (The first half of page 2, for anyone who's interested, but you probably need the set-up from page 1.)

(And no, I don't have a snot fetish, I just couldn't stop myself from writing the scene.)
 
Some pet peeves of mine:

- Sloppy world building. Two of my pet peeves are 20-year old (as in "created 20 years ago and kept as a fuck toy) vampires with the wealth of a small country or a secret society of rare, mythical futanari - and the strip club down by the corner has nothing but said dickgirls working the poles. Great if that's your kink, but stick to one or the other.

- Messy spelling, grammar and punctuation: I can deal with the occasional typo or missed word, but when I need to read a paragraph twice and take notes to understand who is fucking where and with what, the story would have benefited from another edit pass.

- brutal abuse, feces play, humiliation and degradation. Why exactly are all women who enjoy sex "sluts" and "whores" and men "studs" or "lucky guys" again?
 
Back
Top