If you voted for Trump, you support him & you own him forever. Fuck your "safe space"

[about_average]

Lol. The entire narrative on the Covington Boys being racists has been debunked, and even Joy Behar has admitted it.

That, unsurprisingly, went right over your head.
Too funny.

 

[jp55665566]

News sites have to link back to their original sources so of course it's different, more thorough coverage.

If you're presenting something as fact, like that something is THE lone authoritative voice, you need to source it. You're not doing that.

Where are you getting this information? I, and most of my generation, have no idea who these names that you're dropping are. I don't know what the fuck MSM Network News is- the president and most other political figures run blogs and appear on social media. Indy podcasts are a thing. Is Alex Jones like the conservative Young Turks?

Genuinely what the fuck are you talking about?

In short. I'm talking about an Orwellian control of all sources of information. Meaning you will never get whole truths from these "news" sources, they only report officially sanctioned "news". There are some important historical events that illuminate these conditions. JFK, MLK, RFK and many others.
9/11 is a great example. Not a single News organization will point out the absurdity of the official conclusions about WTC7.
It's better if you don't use profane language to express your precious thoughts.

 

[HisArpy]

Do try to keep up.
Your man Trump's "crisis" is on the southern border according to him. Which of those countries you named is on the southern border?

That, unsurprisingly, went right over your head.
Too funny.

What color is the sky in your world?

A crisis is a crisis no matter where it happens. Trying to deflect by saying that the places I listed aren't on the Southern US border doesn't change the fact that they're crisis points.

And of course you completely forgot about all those "national emergencies" Obama called for things like the H1N1 crisis. Which isn't on the Southern US border either.


Joy Behar is a fanatical anti-Trump media personage and yet EVEN SHE had to admit the MSM narrative was a lie.

Apparently you didn't understand that part. Not surprisingly.

 

[HisArpy]

All I did was point out your faulty triggering ascertaining through numbers, something that was apparent to others but not to you. I'm sorry for triggering you into making more non-substance posts. That was cruel and baiting on my part. I shouldn't do such things to the ego driven and easily fished, but it is fun in the moment and I can't lie about that.


Rory is Rory. I'm me. You're you.

Not my fault you can't keep up with the rest of the class.

Uh huh.

Do you realize that those who "bait" and fish" are presenting a lie in order to "catch" their "prey"?

This mean you just admitted to lying intentionally for the laffs you aren't getting. Shameful.

Seriously dudley, you need to wise up and see that you're messing with no one but yourself with this nonsense.

 

[DeluxAuto]

What color is the sky in your world?

A crisis is a crisis no matter where it happens. Trying to deflect by saying that the places I listed aren't on the Southern US border doesn't change the fact that they're crisis points.

And of course you completely forgot about all those "national emergencies" Obama called for things like the H1N1 crisis. Which isn't on the Southern US border either.


Joy Behar is a fanatical anti-Trump media personage and yet EVEN SHE had to admit the MSM narrative was a lie.

Apparently you didn't understand that part. Not surprisingly.

Do you feel that the southern border issue is "National Crisis" worthy of a declaring a national emergency and government shutdown?

Uh huh.

Do you realize that those who "bait" and fish" are presenting a lie in order to "catch" their "prey"?

This mean you just admitted to lying intentionally for the laffs you aren't getting. Shameful.

Seriously dudley, you need to wise up and see that you're messing with no one but yourself with this nonsense.

Still not spelling Dudley correctly.

 

[DeluxAuto]

SUPPORT FOR DONALD TRUMP'S IMPEACHMENT IS HIGHER THAN HIS APPROVAL RATING, NEW POLL SHOWS

https://www.newsweek.com/support-donald-trump-impeachment-higher-approval-rating-vs-new-poll-1300633

 

[CandiCame]

In short. I'm talking about an Orwellian control of all sources of information. Meaning you will never get whole truths from these "news" sources, they only report officially sanctioned "news". There are some important historical events that illuminate these conditions. JFK, MLK, RFK and many others.
9/11 is a great example. Not a single News organization will point out the absurdity of the official conclusions about WTC7.
It's better if you don't use profane language to express your precious thoughts.

You act like you've honestly never been on the internet before.

The reason that we need to preserve net neutrality is to prevent the very thing that you're talking about here. By pretending that it's already a reality you're doing the very thing "they" want you to do. You're giving up before the fight even starts.

 

[jaF0]

Lol. The entire narrative on the Covington Boys being racists has been debunked,

That, unsurprisingly, went right over your head.

It's as plain as the red hats on their heads attached to their red necks.

 

[jaF0]

In short. I'm talking about an Orwellian control of all sources of information. Meaning you will never get whole truths from these "news" sources, they only report officially sanctioned "news". There are some important historical events that illuminate these conditions. JFK, MLK, RFK and many others.
9/11 is a great example. Not a single News organization will point out the absurdity of the official conclusions about WTC7.
It's better if you don't use profane language to express your precious thoughts.

I think you're confused with 2112 by Rush:

"Attention, all Planets of the Solar Federation...
Attention, all Planets of the Solar Federation...
Attention, all Planets of the Solar Federation.
We have assumed control.
We have assumed control.
We have assumed control."

 

[BotanyBoy]

It's as plain as the red hats on their heads attached to their red necks.

It was a made up story by the left.....it was fake news, and because racist, you chugged that kool-aid.

 

[CandiCame]

Hey Harpy, I can tell you right now that if they were from Covington they were shitty people. That's just a thing. And that school in particular is just the fucking worst. They're always in the news over some new bullshit. Like once a month something like this happens, it only made national news this time because of the old dude who stepped in to break up the fight but nothing good comes out of Covington and it's a joke to locals. I've not talked about this because this is such common behavior for those people that it's like seeing a headline from my area that someone shot a crackhead. That's just how those assholes are and you know to avoid the area.

They also protest women's health centers, have constant reports of rapists from "Colonel Crazies", have hate-crimes against the lgbt+ community, or racial minorities, or whatever. That place is a clusterfuck. And if you knew where I was from, you'd know how low I set the bar for clusterfuckery. I expect so little from people.

This isn't an isolated incident by a long shot, is my point. You can probably google "Colonel Crazies" or "Covington Catholic" and believe me you'll find way more shit than this.

When I found out this had made national news I was shocked because like... this is the behavior we expect from those people. That's just how they are. It's a shitty religious republican hellhole of violence, oppression, and brainwashed youth- they're close enough to the Ohio river that folk usually try to pawn them off on Ohio.

 

[jaF0]

It was a made up story by the left.....it was fake news,

You're saying somebody edited the images to add the red hats?

 

[BotanyBoy]

You're saying somebody edited the images to add the red hats?

No I’m saying a white teen standing there smirking isn’t the rise of the racist fourth reich the media tried to hype it up to be.

They didn’t do anything racist, they have not shown any open support for racism or racist policy.

In fact the most racist fuckers in the whole collection of videos surrounding the incident were the black Hebrew Israelites who were throwing racial slurs galore. Given a pass for the blatant racism by the left because black....how delightfully racist of them.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

You act like you've honestly never been on the internet before.

The reason that we need to preserve net neutrality is to prevent the very thing that you're talking about here. By pretending that it's already a reality you're doing the very thing "they" want you to do. You're giving up before the fight even starts.

JP is certifiably nuts about all this conspiracy crap that keeps swirling around 9-11 and political leaders assassinated a half century ago or more.

But I would caution you with regard to your use of the phrase "net neutrality." It has very little to do with censorship of "controversial" content. It has much more to do with internet service providers managing data flow during high peak times in such a (a very tempting) way as to adversely affect their competitors. I mean, if Google wants to maximize efficiency at high peak times, what better way than to slow down or "throttle back" the flow of data packets originating from Yahoo?

And one solution to that gamesmanship is for the same government which gave us the internet to take it back and IMPOSE its version of "net neutrality" on ISPs. And...a reasonable person might opt for that very solution. Or not. Because.....the "gubbermint"!!

Anyway, just my two pennies.

 

[CandiCame]

JP is certifiably nuts about all this conspiracy crap that keeps swirling around 9-11 and political leaders assassinated a half century ago or more.

But I would caution you with regard to your use of the phrase "net neutrality." It has very little to do with censorship of "controversial" content. It has much more to do with internet service providers managing data flow during high peak times in such a (a very tempting) way as to adversely affect their competitors. I mean, if Google wants to maximize efficiency at high peak times, what better way than to slow down or "throttle back" the flow of data packets originating from Yahoo?

And one solution to that gamesmanship is for the same government which gave us the internet to take it back and IMPOSE its version of "net neutrality" on ISPs. And...a reasonable person might opt for that very solution. Or not. Because.....the "gubbermint"!!

Anyway, just my two pennies.

It also allows them to use that same tactic to throttle data from independent sources or basically whatever they want. It's a situation where if the ISP likes you, you load fine, but if they don't, you're looking at a loading screen. It very much can be used to "censor" content. It WILL be used to silence smaller platforms.

Like... by your own logic. Think about what you just said. If they pick Google over Yahoo you know they're going to pick the mainstream news sites that can give them kickback over small individual sites. It very much is exactly what he was describing.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

It also allows them to use that same tactic to throttle data from independent sources or basically whatever they want. It's a situation where if the ISP likes you, you load fine, but if they don't, you're looking at a loading screen. It very much can be used to "censor" content. It WILL be used to silence smaller platforms.

Like... by your own logic. Think about what you just said. If they pick Google over Yahoo you know they're going to pick the mainstream news sites that can give them kickback over small individual sites. It very much is exactly what he was describing.

I'm just saying that the issue generally revolves around the perceived financial interests of service providers rather than a concerted effort to "keep the masses ignorant" of the government's darkest secrets. That's not to deny that a network can be manipulated in the manner you are describing -- only that that is not the predominant issue concerning the phrase "net neutrality."

 

[CandiCame]

I'm just saying that the issue generally revolves around the perceived financial interests of service providers rather than a concerted effort to "keep the masses ignorant" of the government's darkest secrets. That's not to deny that a network can be manipulated in the manner you are describing -- only that that is not the predominant issue concerning the phrase "net neutrality."

I guess I just don't get why you felt the need to bring up the "predominate" issue when the issue I was talking about is the one that was more relevant to conversation and a very real issue that people like that poster are ignoring completely. If he wants the world he's describing, he can get it. But we're not there yet. Ignorance on this subject and apathy from people who think it's already too late is exactly how we get there.

So speaking over it and trying to downplay it is absolutely going to make it worse. So I don't know why you jumped in to TRY to downplay it.

Independent creators will absolutely be crushed under net neutrality and we WILL see monopolized content by large news channels. That's a real thing that will happen BECAUSE of the system you just described. We don't need to downplay that because it's not important to YOU.

I run an online business- net neutrality being taken away will kill me and many others like me. Thank god it's not my main source of income, but for a lot of people, like small content creators on independent news sites, it absolutely is. This is not a small thing- independent creators have gathered together all over the internet to protest for this very reason.

I'm glad this shit doesn't affect you, but it affects a LOT of people. There's no reason to downplay it like you're trying to do.

 

[jaF0]

I've never seen any 'official' indication of it being about an ISP censoring content that isn't illegal. It was about ISPs like ATT&T throttling access to site like iTunes or AppleTV because AT&T also sells audio and video streaming. Or Cox limiting access to DirectTV and Amazon Prime because Cox is basically a cable TV supplier.

 

[jaF0]

They didn’t do anything racist, they have not shown any open support for racism or racist policy.

So, there weren't wearing hate hats?

 

[BotanyBoy]

So, there weren't wearing hate hats?

No.

You just have a serious case of TDS.

 

[jaF0]

Yes.

You have a conscience.

Indeed.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Indeed.

Creating and buying into your own delusions....you might have the worst case of TDS on the gb right now.

 

[jaF0]

Incredible grasp of right and wrong. You may be the best GBer in history.

Indeed.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Indeed.

Lol thanks for helping me prove what a nut you are, this has been one of the easiest jobs ever.

 

[jaF0]

Lol thanks for helping me prove you're the greatest. I'm in awe.

Indeed.