Is Claudine Gay a Plagiarist?

[Rightguide]

http://www.facebook.com/share.php?u...alleging-allegations-were-demonstrably-false/
https://twitter.com/share?url=https...lleging+Allegations+Were+‘Demonstrably+False’

Harvard Itself Unearthed New Case of Plagiarism Not Included In Previous Allegations—After Threatening To Sue New York Post Alleging Allegations Were ‘Demonstrably False’​

Claudine Gay, the university’s president, lifted language from a 1981 article without using quotation marks.​

Aaron Sibarium
December 23, 2023
Harvard University’s review of the plagiarism allegations against its president, Claudine Gay, unearthed a new case of what the university called "inadequate citation" that was not included in any of the documents sent to the school, raising fresh questions about the scope of her misconduct amid a steady drip of damaging revelations.

The new example comes from Gay’s dissertation, where she quoted a 1981 article by Richard Shingles, "Black Consciousness and Political Participation: The Missing Link," without proper attribution, Harvard told the Chronicle of Higher Education on Wednesday.

Harvard elided that novelty in its statement to the Chronicle, listing the new example alongside previously reported ones as if it had already been flagged for the school. Harvard did not respond to a request to comment.

The new example, for which Gay has requested a correction, underscores just how long the list of 40-plus allegations has grown and the possibility that it could grow longer still. It also highlights the weaselly way in which Harvard has sought to downplay the charges, using mealy-mouthed terms like "duplicative language" or, in the case of Shingles’s paper, camouflaging the results of its own probe.

More here on how many lies and fabrications it took to place a communist diversity hire in the President's position at Harvard:

https://freebeacon.com/campus/harva...alleging-allegations-were-demonstrably-false/

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Harvard Itself Unearthed New Case of Plagiarism Not Included In Previous Allegations—After Threatening To Sue New York Post Alleging Allegations Were ‘Demonstrably False’​

Claudine Gay, the university’s president, lifted language from a 1981 article without using quotation marks.​

LOL its so fucking funny to see you posting anything to justify your emotional outrage at a black woman in a powerful position. It must really grate on your self worth.

Sucks to know she's pulling in more a year than you'll ever make.

 

[Rightguide]

LOL its so fucking funny to see you posting anything to justify your emotional outrage at a black woman in a powerful position. It must really grate on your self worth.

Sucks to know she's pulling in more a year than you'll ever make.

So you want to bring race into it, eh? I think Harvard would be better off with Thomas Sowell or Shelby Steele as its President. I don't know what she makes or if it exceeds what I make and I don't care. The question is Harvard itself and the parents of its students getting what they are paying for, I seriously doubt it. They are being scammed from the very top. They send their kids to Harvard to get an education that prepares them for life and they get back a terror supporter who hates Jews.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

So you want to bring race into it, eh?

LOL you bought race into when you started this thread. Fuck off with your fake outrage.

 

[snailspace]

Fire, Ready and AIM, VERDICT FIRST, TRIAL AFTERWARD: Revealed: Harvard cleared Claudine Gay of plagiarism BEFORE investigating her — and its lawyers falsely claimed her work was ‘properly cited’.

 

[Rightguide]

Fire, Ready and AIM, VERDICT FIRST, TRIAL AFTERWARD: Revealed: Harvard cleared Claudine Gay of plagiarism BEFORE investigating her — and its lawyers falsely claimed her work was ‘properly cited’.

The left has no shame when it comes to their agenda. They will abide any perfidy to achieve their totalitarian goals. They don't care what it destroys in the process.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

The left has no shame when it comes to their agenda. They will abide any perfidy to achieve their totalitarian goals. They don't care what it destroys in the process.

lol, you claim Harvard is leftist, then they are Communist, then they hire a plagiarist. You been on both sides of the fence with Harvard you've gotten piles upon piles. See below, for just a taste of the over 50 post just calling Harvard "leftist institution"

According to Alan Dershowitz, a well known liberal professor of law at Harvard, stated in an article on July 11:

"The first issue that must be addressed by Mueller is whether any existing criminal statutes would be violated by collusion between a campaign and a foreign government, if such collusion were to be proved? Unless there is a clear violation of an existing criminal statute, there would be no crime.

Obviously if anyone conspired in advance with another to commit a crime – such as hacking the DNC – that would be criminal. But merely seeking to obtain the work product of a prior hack would be no more criminal than a newspaper publishing the work product of thefts such as the Pentagon Papers and the material stolen by Snowden and Manning. Moreover, the emails sent to Trump Jr. say that the dirt peddled by Veselnitskaya came from “official documents.” No mention is made of hacking or other illegal activities. So it is unlikely that attendance at the meeting violated any criminal statute.

Whether or not such collusion, if it occurred, is a crime, it is clear that the American people have the right to know whether any sort of collusion –legal or illegal – took place. And, if so, what was its nature.

The Mueller investigation is limited to possible criminal activity. Probing the moral, political or other non-criminal implications of collusion with, or interference by, Russia is beyond the jurisdiction of the special counsel. It is the role of Congress, not the Criminal Division of the Justice Department, to make changes in existing laws. Perhaps mere collusion by a campaign with a foreign government should be made a crime, so as to prevent future contamination of our elections. But it is not currently a crime."

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017...crime-or-merely-political-sin-it-depends.html

The other day a Harvard legal type was advocating for kicking males off campus for merely talking about how a woman looks because it fosters the rape culture inherent in men. It's okay however for women to talk about how men look because they do not represent a rape culture. This is the kind of totalitarian mindset in the feminist movement. They want to be able to enforce this BS with the Title IX kangaroo courts they've established on campus.

Only because they were the vast majority of people being outed. Republicans do exist in those same business environments that Democrats do, yet there is no comparison in numbers between the two.



I will when there exists more than mere accusations that me be politically driven and paid for. Show me the "evidence." Don't show me shit that's way beyond the statutes of limitations and unaccompanied by actual evidence.



They have at Harvard, it's a leftist ratcheting up of parameters designed to ensnare more men of either political persuasion.



So, you favor an atmosphere where your career and reputation can be ruined with accusations, not being able to face your accusers, or present a defense because there is no presumption of innocence. Got it, carry on.

Columbia, Berkeley, Brown, Weslyan, Reed, Oberlin, Yale, UC Santa Cruz, New York University, Vassar College, Harvard College of Arts and Sciences, for openers

This should test the alleged new conservative majority on the SCOTUS:


Harvard bias trial to spotlight use of race in college admissions
A lawsuit accusing Harvard University of discriminating against Asian-American applicants is slated to go to trial Monday.
by Reuters / Oct.12.2018 / 12:06 PM PDT

BOSTON — A lawsuit challenging the use of race as a factor in U.S. college admissions will go to trial in Boston on Monday, when Harvard University is scheduled to face accusations that it discriminates against Asian-American applicants.

The lawsuit, backed by the Trump administration, could eventually reach the Supreme Court, giving the newly cemented five-member conservative majority a chance to bar the use of affirmative action to help minority applicants get into college.

“The case is critically important as it’s really about diversity at colleges all across the country,” said Nicole Gon Ochi, an attorney at Asian Americans Advancing Justice–Los Angeles who supports Harvard in the case.

Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA), founded by anti-affirmative action activist Edward Blum, sued Harvard in 2014, contending it illegally engages in “racial balancing” that artificially limits the number of Asian-American students at the Ivy League school.

The U.S. Justice Department, which launched a related probe of Harvard after Republican President Donald Trump’s election, has backed the group, saying the Cambridge, Massachusetts, university has not seriously considered alternative, race-neutral approaches to admissions.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-...spotlight-use-race-college-admissions-n919631

Ex-Harvard professor Charles Lieber convicted of lying about China ties
By Mark Moore
December 22, 2021

A former Harvard University chemistry professor was found guilty Tuesday of lying about his ties to China and not reporting income paid to him by a Chinese-run recruitment program.

Charles Lieber, 62, the former chairman of the Ivy League school’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department, was convicted in Boston federal court of two counts of making false statements, two counts of filing a false income tax return, and two counts of failing to report income from foreign bank and financial accounts.

Without Harvard’s knowledge, Lieber became a “strategic scientist” for the Wuhan Institute of Technology in central China and participated in Beijing’s Thousand Talents Program from 2012 to 2015.

The program was designed to recruit people with high-level knowledge of foreign technology and intellectual property to China.

As part of the recruitment program, the Wuhan institute paid Lieber $50,000 a month and living expenses of up to $150,000, as well as giving him more than $1.5 million to establish a research lab.

More here:

https://nypost.com/2021/12/22/ex-harvard-professor-charles-lieber-lied-about-ties-to-china/

 

[snailspace]

Claudine Gay Update -- Now It's Allegations Of Data Falsification​

https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2023-12-24-claudine-gay-update-now-its-data-falsification

She survives because of Racism

 

[ll74]

I enjoy people who preach "due process" about 45, immediately attacking someone without. It's fun

 

[snailspace]

I enjoy people who preach "due process" about 45, immediately attacking someone without. It's fun

I know you think of yourself as the smartest person in the room, but you have no idea what due process is.

The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause guarantees procedural due process, meaning that government actors must follow certain procedures before they may deprive a person of a protected life, liberty, or property interest.

No one is depriving her of anything, so one is attacking her, they are merely pointing out her

Plagiarist submissions and falsified submissions. To attack those that are raising legit issues backed by hard facts is racist.​

 

[ll74]

I know you think of yourself as the smartest person in the room, but you have no idea what due process is.

How exciting for you. I'm sure you've given Gay hers.

The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause guarantees procedural due process, meaning that government actors must follow certain procedures before they may deprive a person of a protected life, liberty, or property interest.

How did the courts rule on the 14th?

No one is depriving her of anything, so one is attacking her, they are merely pointing out her

Plagiarist submissions and falsified submissions. To attack those that are raising legit issues backed by hard facts is racist.​

Lol...sure you aren't.

 

[snailspace]

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/educati...s-the-squeeze-dd6f3901?mod=us-news_lead_story

 

[ll74]

https://www.wsj.com/us-news/educati...s-the-squeeze-dd6f3901?mod=us-news_lead_story

Here's some help - political accusations and pressure is not due process.

 

[YDB95]

I'll repeat.

This woman, this President, would immediately expel a student charged similarly.

You don't know that, unless you went to Harvard yourself (which I sincerely doubt). What she did, although serious, probably would not rise to the level of expulsion at most universities - and even less so in the Ivy League, where they tend to go especially easy on first-time offenders.

 

[snailspace]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...arvard-2001-academic-paper-data-reviewed.html

The accusations have been around for years

 

[JoePepsiCo]

What we're learning and what I've been patiently explaining for a long time and getting a lot of grief over it, it that she is a symptom of a sick culture in academia known and referred to in offhand fashion as, Publish or Perish.

Nobody read her paper, Her peers just rubber-stamped it as they expect her to do for them so that they can keep advancing in a top-heavy academic hierarchy that only serves the students by sucking money away from them for their salaries and benefits while they write books that only their peers pretend to read and their students are forced to purchase and read for their classes.

They ALL plagiarize because none of them are involved in new, groundbreaking research. That shit is what we call, "few and far between." Like a swimming shark, if you aren't publishing in the Governmental-Education Complex, then you're dying (not advancing).

In modern academia, this woman is not the exception, she is the rule and that is why the circling of wagons and the vehemence of defense lest she (and friends who "identify" with her based on criteria other than the content of her character) turn on them and expose them too. They are a class and they act like a class. They just don't teach class any longer.




(See what I did there?)

 

[YDB95]

(See what I did there?)

Yes, I do. You misappropriated Martin Luther King.
And, to be fair, also made a fair point. But you just had to throw in some right-wing propaganda in there too.

 

[pocjet]

She seems like a bad person, https://www.newsweek.com/claudine-g...s-dont-defend-her-being-black-opinion-1855912

 

[JoePepsiCo]

It's not propaganda when it's a gentle reminder to the Left that this is what you say you stand for, even when you rail against it.

Nothing right-wing about it. I come from the Left. The Left left me behind years ago when righteous action and justified outrage yielded to obsessive intrusion on everyone else's lives, liberty and pursuit of happiness based on an ever-shifting, shiftless set of ephemeral values that are generally valueless because once you have a value, it can be attacked. If you stand for and believe in nothing other than the wet side of your finger in the wind, then every held value is just ignorance and propaganda.

The new-age liberal needs to be very attentive, reflexive and flexible to the point of being malleable to herd mentality.

Liberal has become synonymous with lemming.

 

[YDB95]

Liberal has become synonymous with lemming.

Since what you're alluding to with respect to lemmings here is a myth (they don't really follow one another to mass suicide), this actually makes sense in a way. Your view of the one is just as inaccurate as your view of the other.

 

[SubzeroGirl]

If she’s not then all the students accused should get the same treatment. That will end well.

 

[JoePepsiCo]

Since what you're alluding to with respect to lemmings here is a myth (they don't really follow one another to mass suicide), this actually makes sense in a way. Your view of the one is just as inaccurate as your view of the other.

Common Cultural Meme universally understood.

Would you have been happier with a Jonestown Kool-Aid™ reference?

 

[Ovidius]

All dissertations are plagiarised, the protocol is to list the sources used. It's an exercise in researching published sources, not original research.

Poorly educated people don't know this simple trick.

Indeed. And since there is no mention of it, I would assume that this paragraph is not the main result of her thesis. And I would further assume that this is all that was found.

 

[Rightguide]

Harvard honor council student says Claudine Gay got by on 'lower standard' in plagiarism case, should resign​

The Harvard Honor Council votes on honor code infractions among the student body​

By Anders Hagstrom Fox News
Published December 31, 2023 1:23pm EST

An undergraduate member of Harvard's Honor Council believes university president Claudine Gay is "getting off easy" from her recent plagiarism allegations.

The student, who remained anonymous, wrote an op-ed published in the Harvard Crimson student newspaper on Sunday. Gay is facing widespread accusations of antisemitism and plagiarism, but the university's board has declared it still supports her.

"I have served as a voting member of the Harvard College Honor Council, the body tasked with upholding the College’s community standards of academic integrity," the student began. "In my time on the Council, I heard dozens of cases. When students — my classmates, peers, and friends — appear before the council, they are distraught. For most, it is the worst day of their college careers. For some, it is the worst day of their lives. They often cry."

"It is because I have seen first-hand how heart-wrenching these decisions can be, and still think them necessary, that I call on University President Claudine Gay to resign for her numerous and serious violations of academic ethics," the student continued.

More here: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ha...-lower-standard-plagiarism-case-should-resign

But as we all know it would take personal integrity to accept reality and resign but as her record now indicates, she doesn't have much.

 

[ll74]

Harvard honor council student says Claudine Gay got by on 'lower standard' in plagiarism case, should resign​

The Harvard Honor Council votes on honor code infractions among the student body​

By Anders Hagstrom Fox News
Published December 31, 2023 1:23pm EST

An undergraduate member of Harvard's Honor Council believes university president Claudine Gay is "getting off easy" from her recent plagiarism allegations.

The student, who remained anonymous, wrote an op-ed published in the Harvard Crimson student newspaper on Sunday. Gay is facing widespread accusations of antisemitism and plagiarism, but the university's board has declared it still supports her.

"I have served as a voting member of the Harvard College Honor Council, the body tasked with upholding the College’s community standards of academic integrity," the student began. "In my time on the Council, I heard dozens of cases. When students — my classmates, peers, and friends — appear before the council, they are distraught. For most, it is the worst day of their college careers. For some, it is the worst day of their lives. They often cry."

"It is because I have seen first-hand how heart-wrenching these decisions can be, and still think them necessary, that I call on University President Claudine Gay to resign for her numerous and serious violations of academic ethics," the student continued.

More here: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ha...-lower-standard-plagiarism-case-should-resign

But as we all know it would take personal integrity to accept reality and resign but as her record now indicates, she doesn't have much.

Finally, someone who actually posts opinions of people that matter in the discussion. Harvard alum, donors and students.

The rest is noise and stupidity. Sadly, it took that stupidity to bring this to the forefront and that should concern Harvard alumni and donors more than anything.

And what do they say? She should resign because of her accurate testimony? No....she should resign because of her writing, which is questionable.