Booboobear84
Dancing bear
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2018
- Posts
- 13,586
EPA front line people are good folks who care about the environment. We had a guy who saw that our logs reported incidents. He was totally cool with that because we were clearly serious (empty log books were a red flag for him). The further up the food chain the more they are about power and less about the environment.Wrong.
Does every regulation make sense? Maybe not.
Have I worked in places that seriously needed more oversight? Absolutely. I won't pretend I wasn't a teeny bit thrilled when I found out a former boss couldn't sell his property because he'd spent years just dumping old ink and printing waste (it was a print shop) in the back lot instead of disposing of it properly. It kind of screwed up his retirement plans. But he was a dick who took every shortcut imaginable and nickel-and-dimed everyone (especially his staff). EPA oversight can be burdensome at times, sure. But in a lot of cases it's absolutely necessary. I think the Ghostbusters containment unit falls squarely into the absolutely necessary category.
I will again say that it doesn't sound like you actually dealt with real EPA compliance (we were introducing a new substance that was of interest to EPA). The compliance paperwork is heinous.
And yes that guy sounds like an Ahole for whom enough bad stuff can't happen.
Last edited: