Just for Fun--First Lines of Rejected Novels

Richard Needle was a carefree, proud lad when he came of age, and people began to refer to him as Dick Needle; that changed when he found himself drafted, and the Army enlisted him as ... Needle, Dick.
 
Only she wrote "said Brick Laine."

My editor would strongly oppose your statement about English rules being guidelines only. She's a professor, and trust me, you... I was about to say that you don't want to fuck with her, but you probably would.
Yeah, that's a nice appeal to authority there, honey. (y) you do you; you're going to do it anyway, I should have realised it was futile before I bothered.
 
I submitted this entry a while back to the infamous Bulwer Lytton bad writing contest (the idea is to write the opening sentence to the worst novel imaginable). Unfortunately, it did not get recognition.

Porky quietly crept toward the movie set trailer (much larger than his own), hand grimly gripping the pistol, mind ecstatically envisioning that smug bunny munching his last carrot, and heart crazily cueing up a febrile fugue of rage and revenge -- a lifetime without pants or genitals will do that to a pig.
 
Brick Laine said. In English, the subject comes before the verb. Find an editor! :LOL:

This isn't even a guideline, let alone a rule. Since you like authority, look it up in the Chicago Manual of Style, section 13.39 et seq. It offers multiple examples. It's perfectly acceptable style to put the verb first or second in a dialogue tag. It reads better if you mix it up. Tolkien, an Oxford professor, often placed "said" before the noun in his books. It's not a rule in either American or British English.

If we were to follow the logic of your "rule" to its conclusion, then we would always begin dialogue sentences with the tag, because the dialogue itself is the object of the tag verb and by your logic as the object it should come last.

E.g.,

Max said, "This is errant, pedantic nonsense."

As opposed to

"This is errant, pedantic nonsense," Max said.
 
Doing myself would be the ultimate achievement for a narcissist, but unfortunately, I'm not that long.
You have no imagination. In my Mickey Spillane tribute story, I had my protagonist, ever so loosely a fictional moi, fuck a young English boy who I modelled upon myself aged twenty, tanned, blond. If you're going to do narcissism, do it properly, or don't bother.
 
I've killed a few of own stories because I realized the MC could walk away, and that it was undeniably sensible to do so.
I think most times the MC could walk away. It’s about creating the internal and external forces that make them stand and fight…High Noon style, but a sexy High Noon.
 
I think most times the MC could walk away. It’s about creating the internal and external forces that make them stand and fight…High Noon style, but a sexy High Noon.
Agreed. Sometimes it's about the proper motivation, and building stakes high enough to be worthy of the effort. One problem I have in erotica is a lack of stakes in some concepts. Slutty character does slutty things isn't fun to write for me. (Comparitively)innocent character does slutty things for a reason, and has to deal with the consequences is more interesting. Sometimes it's hard to balance motivation and stakes. I need both if I'm going to spend the grueling effort on a complex writing project. I hope that makes sense. Thanks for the insightful feedback.
 
Genre: Courtroom Procedural

Approaching the bench, Wei Su Mi lamented the litigious nature of modern society.
 
Back
Top