Might get banned for this....

I read somewhere in the forums that Lit was hacked somehow, and that usernames (abandoned?) with early “join dates” were hijacked by some troll(s).

I am super suspicious of any poster who has a 2002 join date with only 200 posts…

Just sayin’…

(And then there are those trolls who have a spreadsheet to keep track of their alts…)

😑
So, in your supposition that anyone who has been on Literotica since 2022 with only 200 posts is a troll, right? Well, whatever helps you sleep well at night.
 
Ass kissing is real. If only brownnosing could get Laurel and Manu to finally fix the issues with this website!
You would think that, especially since they added other crap like chats and webcams with a female-to-male dynamic, would allow them to fix their issues with the website, which, at best, is antiquated.
 
I read somewhere in the forums that Lit was hacked somehow, and that usernames (abandoned?) with early “join dates” were hijacked by some troll(s).

I am super suspicious of any poster who has a 2002 join date with only 200 posts…

Just sayin’…

(And then there are those trolls who have a spreadsheet to keep track of their alts…)

😑
I see a bunch of old low post count ID's crop up. See them often in the looking for a story forum or when they used to do nominations for the annual awards.

Not everyone comes here to live on the forums....like many of us do.
 
Uh oh! Low post count alert! Warning! Warning! Danger Will Robinson!

This was ridiculous in the 90s. It's become absurd to the point of parody at this point.
 
No, sorry facts aren't hard to come by. Sometimes they are hard to recognize when you do. A fact is a thing that has been proven by numerous people numerous times to be true and when tested always comes out true. I can't see or hear or hold in my hand the fact our little dirt ball orbits a huge star but I know it does because others have proven it over and over and over again. Facts aren't opinions. Facts are real and provable. Opinions on the other hand are like smoke, made from ethereal substances and like smoke just as likely to vanish in the slightest breeze of scrutiny. Everyone should be wary when someone quotes a "fact". No one should take such things at face value. Anyone who does is asking to be flim-flammed. I fact-check everything presented as a fact.

And you can find a graph of chart to prove any point you want. The key, is it fantasy or real? Too many accept the first thing that agrees with what they want rather than checking to see if it meets the rigorous requirement of having been dissected so many times it has to be what it presents itself to be.

Yes there are real, verifiable facts. Some are not going to agree with what we want them to be. Some will be as elusive as a diamond in a pig pen. But they will always, always be worth the time and effort to seek them out and verify they are what they profess to be.


Comshaw
Yep. An opinion would be, the Mustang is better than the Camaro. A fact is the Mustang has been in production longer and more consistant, than the Camaro.
 
I see a bunch of old low post count ID's crop up. See them often in the looking for a story forum or when they used to do nominations for the annual awards.

Not everyone comes here to live on the forums....like many of us do.

I’ve seen many crop up that are clearly trolling…

😳

😑
 
This was my primary posting ID for most of my early years on Lit, and my first pen name. I use different browsers to log in with each of my pen names. I hate switching accounts on one browser. The browser RR is logged into became my preferred daily ride, so RR took over as the representative of the Triad.

Still only about 13k posts combined in 20 years. :: suspicious :: :cautious:
 
I don't really understand how people so confidently identify alts. But I do like the idea of a klaxon sounding through the forum when someone runs afoul of whatever the indicators are. Maybe sending out those little FOREIGN CONTAMINANT bots from WALL-E.
 
I have seen at least on ID inactive since like the 2010s that was obviously hijacked by a spammer. Perfectly normal posts up until then, drops off the face of the planet, then returns out of nowhere like a week ago to post pure spam all over the forum. So it's not out of the question. Still, it was painfully obvious once you looked at it.
 
Both actually, not counting $$$ value. What would you rather own. A first year (64) mustang or a first year (66) camaro? Both would have all whistles and bells
Production wise, the Mustang has been in consistant production from 1964½ until now. The Camaro had been in production from 1966 until 2002, then reentered production in 2005, and went out of production in 2025.

As far as which is better goes back to opinion. Both first gens are over rated to me, you can go to just about any car show, throw a rock and hit either. I like more Mustangs than Camaros. I would own a third gen of both(79-93 Mustang & 82-92 Camaro).
 
Back
Top