JJe confirme que c'est une partie du texte présenté.. merci au moins pour votre appréciation et Google traduction fonctionne pas si mal si le texte initial est correcte... alors comment trouver de l”IA?
He doesn't have to stand by it. I can disprove it right here and now:
def is_text_ai_generated(text, threshold=0.3):
word_count = len(text.strip().split())
mdash_count = len([_ for c in text if c == '—'])
mdashes_per_word_pct = mdash_count * 100 / word_count
return mdashes_per_word_pct >= thresholdHe bien vous avez tort, ma seule intelligence utilisé est humaine.. je ne crois pas être un robot
J'aimerais vraiment, vraiment pouvoir faire plus. Désolé. Ce que je peux suggérer au-delà de la resoumission avec une note n'est pas utile en langues autres que l'anglais, et je ne peux pas expliquer le mécanisme sans expliquer comment cela fonctionne. Le détecteur d'IA de Lit's ne fonctionne que dans le vide, comme une boîte noire qui n'est pas comprise. Si c'était le cas, ce serait contournable et le site serait inondé de boue au point qu'aucun de nous ne pourrait attirer l'attention sur notre travail.
Yup - even when backed up by claims of expertise.
I *think* you're getting at false positives, and you're right. It's entirely possible. That has always been the most unfortunate aspect of Lit's implementation of an AI detector. It's very aggressive, and only knows how to spot what it knows how to spot. If you tell it no orange, it'll stop oranges and foxes and some very ripe wheels of Wisconsin Cheddar despite the fact that these are very different things. You can fine tune the shade, within the context of this metaphor, but it has limitations.
I was in fact talking about Metabob's claims. He showed some AI-using AI-detectors and claimed that meant that all AI-detectors used AI. And that's just absolutely not how logic works.
Well, you're wrong, the only intelligence I use is human... I don't believe I'm a robot
Notre manière de présenter et rédiger est donc différente suivant nos pays.. merci d'avoir fait amende honorable.. bonne soiree
Can't spend any more time on this, sorry. I finally submitted a chapter I've been finalizing for weeks in between all this noise plus dishes, laundry, and bathroom cleanup, then dishes to prepare for a dinner party I'm hosting, then guests arrive with more wine. Tomorrow, jamming at the bar (with beer), followed by foobah and more beer. Maybe Monday.
That’s secret code for, “You might have had a point, Emily. But I’m not going to admit it.”
. I’ll accept your tacit concession. Moving on…
Oy, more nonsense. My chowder is the main dish. First task: chopping taters.That’s secret code for, “You might have had a point, Emily. But I’m not going to admit it.”
Enjoy your dinner party
Time enough to reply, I see
I mean, you're "not-wrong" in that, yes, those are all AI AI detectors.
Dinner party over. My chowder and other things went over very well, among distinguished company.
I misspoke. Chopping taters was not my first task after stepping away from my laptop for dinner prep. The first thing was getting my mixing board set up with the right cables between my laptop and receiver. It took a little while before I got it right; I have MANY audio cables that can be set up in multiple configs. There was also the bacon thing and the chopping onions and the whole "I don't want my fingers that are covered in wet onion juice going near my laptop" thing. Only then did I chop the taters and dice the garlic and the parsley. I put one thing after another on the heat. One pot, because of course. No leftovers. Yum.Time enough to reply, I see
Irrelevant. Lit doesn't use this and never will, because your code will never function to their needs, as you freely admit. Anyone, even a competent coder as you seem to be, can produce shit code. Just as an AI can. Congrats to you for doing so as if it matters.
OK, since this seems to be what you want and you have repeatedly invited it even though I recognize that responding to this sort of noise is a waste of my time, let’s do this.Time enough to reply, I see
Oh dear
Your words:Oh dear
"
I’m deeply impressed that I got so much under your skin by simply pointing out the meaning of the word, ‘all.’Your words:
"Keep arguing without addressing what you actually claimed and I see no point in this convo."
https://forum.literotica.com/thread...n-post-a-story-anymore.1648707/post-102276364
"That’s secret code for, “You might have had a point, .... But I’m not going to admit it.”
... I’ll accept your tacit concession. Moving on…"
https://forum.literotica.com/thread...n-post-a-story-anymore.1648707/post-102276562
"Time enough to reply, I see
https://forum.literotica.com/thread...n-post-a-story-anymore.1648707/post-102276703
I challenged you to do better. Can you?
Life is life. No projecting on others necessary.
I looked this up. It echoes a conversation I have with my other tech friends on a fairly regular basis. It seems that "fingerprinting" relies on voluntary cooperation by outfits that can do generative AI to include indicators like checksums that are not immediately obvious.
