A well regulated militia… so funny how those words are ignored. But there is a comma there so comprehension is difficult.
So you grab that AR-15 because it’s so versatile. Seems like it needs it’s own infomercial. A family rifle…it dices, it slices.
Did he take your rifle away?
Similar situation with me. I bought mine when I was living in CA. At the time, state law mandated manufacturers of semiautomatic rifles to devise a mag release that required a “tool.” They came up with the bullet button which my AR came with. Then Newsom came along with a new set of laws which ironically incentivized all of us bullet button-equipped AR owners to remove the bullet button and replace with a standard mag release. You can’t make this stuff up!
Did they take your guns?
He didn't because he couldn't as a law abiding citizen of the United States,I am protected by the Second Amendment of the Constitution. The question you should be asking is "Is he punishing criminals?" That answer would be "No", and therein lies the problem. His failure to protect innocent law abiding citizens has led to good people feeling that they have to protect themselves. It is the political corruption of law enforcement.
Oh, yeah. I forgot you exist.
Really, so all the gun deaths are Newsom's fault? Is that what you are claiming?
Well, not EVERY issue.
So there was never any danger of you losing your gun and you buying one had nothing to do with anything but your own delusions.
Do knives make you safer? Who are you safer from?
Gun violence is, in most cases, committed by people breaking a law.
Virtue Signaling is easy, but the devil is in the details
With a gun
Some think so.
I wouldn't, though other countries have
Suicide leads the way, with homicide a close second. Is suicide illegal in the US? it is not in Canada.
No
Why do they need to collect them all? Most people who have posted are not advocating for "all" rifles or hand guns to be banned. Just certain types.
With cash of course.
There in lies the difficulty with gun confiscation. First of all it would be a monumental task if people refused to voluntarily surrender them. Imagine having to send police, or the military, to millions of homes to search for firearms. That would take decades. Secondly, what would you do with the people that refused? Obviously they would be arrested, but where would you house them? Jails are overcrowded now. Perhaps the FEMA camps could be used for them? Who would compensate the firearm owners for their firearms? I don't own any guns worth thousands of dollars but I know people that do. They are going to demand compensation if they surrender their guns.
WOW.. your ignorance & stereotyping is REALLY showing here. I was raised around handguns and rifles, the correct way, with VERY responsible parents and learned very young the power such a weapon holds. I am a VERY civilized adult debater, who refuses to namecall and act like a child, on this and other topics, but clearly, your mind is already made up, so I will simply wish you a good day and a begging urge to PLEASE open your eyes and don't stereotype ALL of ANY group into one big idiotic bunch. The majority of gun owners I know are quite intelligent actually. And aren't intimidated by rainbow flags or bud light. Most will have a civil debate about it with anybody, trying to educate those who clearly know nothing of the subject matter and wish you a pleasant day, no matter the outcome.Lit Deplorables seem to have a limited knowledge of firearms when it comes to actual facts. And their chickenshit nature leads me to believe they'd never be able to pull a gun on another person - even to protect a loved one.
So, at least they're not a threat. Just drink a Bud Light, or unfurl a rainbow flag, and they'll run away crying to vent their disgust on the Internet rather than confront anyone.
