This sounds like an example of the "erotic chat" and "Conversation is intercourse" your tagline speaks to. The presumptuous psychosis presented about the lack of social maturity and immature development "projected" above, precludes the need for us to be impolite and tell you to go fuck yourself.
Well said. ..And it's been my experience as well. To put it succinctly, they are just weird.
Not when it's only being policed by snowflakes on the left.
That isn't a one word answer and my question wasn't to you.
You're full of crap. Seriously.
I don't give a shit.
You fail are reading comprehension yet again. What (edited) statement did I make?
Your answer suggest that your answer is yes.
He won't be getting out of jail anytime soon, He's facing 185 years.
What part of guns making it easier to kill people do you not understand?
Ignoring a part of the problem doesn't make it not a problem. Guns make it easier for killers to kill. It's the same from gangs, to school shooters to kids at home.
Doubling down on the dumb? That's your move here?
Repeating the question to you - do you support the policing of social media?
Colt is being tried as an adult. he won't be getting out of jail either. His mom will probably succumb to a drug overdose. She should have been charged as well, she watched it all happen.
I was specifically mentioning school killings.
The guns are part of the problem. I don't support anything about mentally people not getting the help and attention they need.
The guns are part of the problem
The guns are part of the problem
Welcome to the conversation Rob.Each time there is a school shooting involving a firearm, there is a statistical certainty that one or more slack-jawed mouth-breathing knuckle-dragging inbred MAGA weirdo will show up spluttering "but...but...AUTOMOBILES!" and/or "but...but....knives!"
Today's deflection apology is provided by some weirdo named "Dom70", who attempts once again to convince us that the rights of our school children to have a gunshot-free education is secondary to his right to plink chipmunks at grandad's farm.
Addressing the "but but automobiles!" rationalization: The primary purpose of automobiles is transportation. People inevitably have accidents in automoblies, given the huge number of miles driven by the general public each year. Attempting to conflate accidental automobile deaths with deliberate shooting death brings shame and dishonor to your family name
Addressing the "but but knives!' rationalization: it takes a lot of skill, stamina and coordination to kill 15 people. The three most likely Political Board candidates to shoot up a school lack one or more of these important traits:
15 schoolchildren could easily disarm one or more of these knife wielding wannabee mass murderers above without much effort. Give these bozos a semi-automatic weapon with a large capacity magazine and the outcome would likely be markedly different, particularly in Wat_Tyler's case (his panic attacks and inability to distinguish friend from foe would result in much higher inadvertent "collateral damage").
- HisArpy can barely stand, and refers to himself now as "disabled"
- JoePepsiCo relies on a hover-round to navigate the treacherous terrain inside his double-wide trailer
- Wat_Tyler cannot walk to his own mailbox without getting winded.
In summary: your feeble attempt at rebuttal is as laughable as it is ignorant. You are the absolute dregs of humanity, and the sooner you shuffle off the mortal coil, the better we all will be as a species.
If you remove accidental deaths, guns kill far more children than anything else.
I do not disagree with THAT statement ll74...but that was not what was said originally. We agree again! We need to stop that! People will start talking! lol
